Research Article

Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds

Volume: 51 Number: 1 January 1, 2023
EN

Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds

Abstract

Image processing techniques are frequently used for extracting quantitative information (cell area, cell size, cell counting, etc.) from different types of microscopic images. Image analysis of cell biology and tissue engineering is time consuming and requires personal expertise. In addition, evaluation of the results may be subjective. Therefore, computer-based learning applications have been rapidly developed in recent years. In this study, Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) images of the viable pre-osteoblastic mouse MC3T3-E1 cells in 3D bioprinted tissue scaffolds, captured from a bone tissue regeneration study, were analyzed by using image processing techniques. The goal of this study is to develop a reliable and fast algorithm for semi-automatic analysis of CLSM images. Percentages of live and dead cell areas in the scaffolds were determined with image correlation, and then, total cell viabilities were calculated. The other goal of this study is to determine the depth profile of viable cells in 3D tissue scaffold. Manual measurements of four different analysts were obtained. The measurement variations of analysts, also known as the coefficient of variation, were determined from 13.18% to 98.34% for live cell images and from 9.75% to 126.02% for dead cell images. To overcome this subjectivity, a semi-automatic algorithm was developed. Consequently, cross-sectional image sets of three different types of tissue scaffolds were analyzed. As a result, maximum cell viabilities were obtained at intervals of 63 µm and 90 µm from the scaffold surface.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] V. Ntziachristos, Fluorescence Molecular Imaging, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 8 (2006) 1–33.
  2. [2] G.Y. Wiederschain, The Molecular Probes handbook A guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies, 11th ed., Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2010.
  3. [3] W. Grootjans, E.A. Usmanij, W.J.G. Oyen, E.H.F.M. van der Heijden, E.P. Visser, D. Visvikis, M. Hatt, J. Bussink, L.F. de Geus-Oei, Performance of automatic image segmentation algorithms for calculating total lesion glycolysis for early response monitoring in non-small cell lung cancer patients during concomitant chemoradiotherapyFDG-PET in early NSCLC response assessment, Radiother. Oncol., 119 (2016) 473–479.
  4. [4] Y. Liu, Y. Chen, B. Han, Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Su, Fully automatic Breast ultrasound image segmentation based on fuzzy cellular automata framework, Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 40 (2018) 433–442.
  5. [5] X. Li, J. Liu, Z. Liu, X. He, C. Zhang, H. Yuan, F. Liu, C. Zheng, Automatic detection of leukocytes for cytometry with color decomposition, Optik (Stuttg)., 127 (2016) 11901–11910.
  6. [6] G. Narayanan, M.Y. Tekbudak, Y. Caydamli, J. Dong, W.E. Krause, Accuracy of electrospun fiber diameters: The importance of sampling and person-to-person variation, Polym. Test., 61 (2017) 240–248.
  7. [7] S. Nazlibilek, D. Karacor, T. Ercan, M.H. Sazli, O. Kalender, Y. Ege, Automatic segmentation, counting, size determination and classification of white blood cells, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., 55 (2014) 58–65.
  8. [8] J. Malašauskiene, R. Milašius, Investigation and estimation of structure of web from electrospun nanofibres, J. Nanomater., 2013 (2013).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 1, 2023

Submission Date

February 1, 2021

Acceptance Date

June 7, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 51 Number: 1

APA
Uyar, T., Erdamar, A., Gümüşderelioğlu, M., Akşahin, M. F., Irmak, G., & Eroğul, O. (2023). Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 51(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.15671/hjbc.868396
AMA
1.Uyar T, Erdamar A, Gümüşderelioğlu M, Akşahin MF, Irmak G, Eroğul O. Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds. HJBC. 2023;51(1):37-50. doi:10.15671/hjbc.868396
Chicago
Uyar, Tansel, Aykut Erdamar, Menemşe Gümüşderelioğlu, Mehmet Feyzi Akşahin, Gülseren Irmak, and Osman Eroğul. 2023. “Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds”. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry 51 (1): 37-50. https://doi.org/10.15671/hjbc.868396.
EndNote
Uyar T, Erdamar A, Gümüşderelioğlu M, Akşahin MF, Irmak G, Eroğul O (January 1, 2023) Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry 51 1 37–50.
IEEE
[1]T. Uyar, A. Erdamar, M. Gümüşderelioğlu, M. F. Akşahin, G. Irmak, and O. Eroğul, “Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds”, HJBC, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 37–50, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.15671/hjbc.868396.
ISNAD
Uyar, Tansel - Erdamar, Aykut - Gümüşderelioğlu, Menemşe - Akşahin, Mehmet Feyzi - Irmak, Gülseren - Eroğul, Osman. “Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds”. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry 51/1 (January 1, 2023): 37-50. https://doi.org/10.15671/hjbc.868396.
JAMA
1.Uyar T, Erdamar A, Gümüşderelioğlu M, Akşahin MF, Irmak G, Eroğul O. Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds. HJBC. 2023;51:37–50.
MLA
Uyar, Tansel, et al. “Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds”. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 1, Jan. 2023, pp. 37-50, doi:10.15671/hjbc.868396.
Vancouver
1.Tansel Uyar, Aykut Erdamar, Menemşe Gümüşderelioğlu, Mehmet Feyzi Akşahin, Gülseren Irmak, Osman Eroğul. Automated Cell Viability Analysis in Tissue Scaffolds. HJBC. 2023 Jan. 1;51(1):37-50. doi:10.15671/hjbc.868396

HACETTEPE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND CHEMİSTRY

Copyright © Hacettepe University Faculty of Science

http://www.hjbc.hacettepe.edu.tr/

https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hjbc