Laccase Production with Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis

Volume: 39 Number: 3 August 1, 2011
  • Aynur Demir
  • Pınar Aytar
  • Serap Gedikli
  • Ahmet Çabuk
  • Münevver Arısoy
EN TR

Laccase Production with Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate benefit and cost analysis of enzyme production with solid state and submerged fermentation techniques, biotechnological processes within production of value-added products. The approach of benefit and cost analysis is commonly used a way at deciding and investigating of the project. This analysis was referred two methodologies on production of laccase, a significant enzyme at environmental biotechnology. According to the result of the comparison, benefit/cost ratio in laccase activity obtained with solid state fermentation was calculated 1.76 and the ratio of laccase activity was 22.62 U ml-1, whereas those of submerged fermentation was 2.42 and the activity was 29.08 U ml-1. In particular, induced liquid culture obtained submerged fermentation is seen maximum benefit of production facilities and the minimum cost. This situation indicates laccase production with this type fermentation for a company is more attractive

Keywords

References

  1. 1. S.Rodriguez Couto, M.A., Sanrom´an, Application of solid-state fermentation to ligninolytic enzyme production, Biochem. Eng. J., 22 (2005) 211.
  2. 2. A. Pandey, Solid-state fermentation, Biochem. Eng. J., 13 (2003) 81.
  3. 3. R.R. Singhania, R.K. Sukumarana, A.K. Patelb, et al., Advancement and comparative profiles in the production technologies using solid-state and submerged fermentation for microbial cellulases, Enzym. Microb. Tech., 46 (2010) 541.
  4. 4. G. Viniegra-Gonz´alez, E. Favela-Torres, Why solidstate fermentation seems to be resistant to catabolite repression?, Food Technol. Biotechnol., 44 (2006) 397.
  5. 5. G. Viniegra-Gonz´alez, 1998. Strategies for the selection of mold strains geared to produce enzymes on solid substrates, in: E. Glindo, O.T. Ram´ırez (Eds.), Advances in Biprocess Engineering II, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p. 123–136.
  6. 6. G. Viniegra-Gonz´alez, E. Favela-Torres, C. Noe Aguilar, et al., Advantages of fungal enzyme production in solid state over liquid fermentation systems, Biochem. Eng. J., 13 (2003) 157.
  7. 7. Y. Matsumoto, G. Saucedo-Castañeda, S. Revah, et al., Production of β-N-acetylhexosaminidase of Verticillium lecanii by solid state and submerged fermentations utilizing shrimp waste silage as substrate and inducer, Process Biochem., 39 (2004) 665.
  8. 8. T. Robinson, G. McMullan, R. Marchant, et al., Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative, Bioresour. Technol., 77 (2001) 247.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Aynur Demir This is me

Pınar Aytar This is me

Serap Gedikli This is me

Ahmet Çabuk This is me

Münevver Arısoy This is me

Publication Date

August 1, 2011

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2011 Volume: 39 Number: 3

APA
Demir, A., Aytar, P., Gedikli, S., Çabuk, A., & Arısoy, M. (2011). Laccase Production with Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 39(3), 305-313. https://izlik.org/JA98YM36CY
AMA
1.Demir A, Aytar P, Gedikli S, Çabuk A, Arısoy M. Laccase Production with Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis. HJBC. 2011;39(3):305-313. https://izlik.org/JA98YM36CY
Chicago
Demir, Aynur, Pınar Aytar, Serap Gedikli, Ahmet Çabuk, and Münevver Arısoy. 2011. “Laccase Production With Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis”. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry 39 (3): 305-13. https://izlik.org/JA98YM36CY.
EndNote
Demir A, Aytar P, Gedikli S, Çabuk A, Arısoy M (August 1, 2011) Laccase Production with Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry 39 3 305–313.
IEEE
[1]A. Demir, P. Aytar, S. Gedikli, A. Çabuk, and M. Arısoy, “Laccase Production with Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis”, HJBC, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 305–313, Aug. 2011, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA98YM36CY
ISNAD
Demir, Aynur - Aytar, Pınar - Gedikli, Serap - Çabuk, Ahmet - Arısoy, Münevver. “Laccase Production With Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis”. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry 39/3 (August 1, 2011): 305-313. https://izlik.org/JA98YM36CY.
JAMA
1.Demir A, Aytar P, Gedikli S, Çabuk A, Arısoy M. Laccase Production with Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis. HJBC. 2011;39:305–313.
MLA
Demir, Aynur, et al. “Laccase Production With Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis”. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, vol. 39, no. 3, Aug. 2011, pp. 305-13, https://izlik.org/JA98YM36CY.
Vancouver
1.Aynur Demir, Pınar Aytar, Serap Gedikli, Ahmet Çabuk, Münevver Arısoy. Laccase Production with Submerged and Solid State Fermentation: Benefit and Cost Analysis. HJBC [Internet]. 2011 Aug. 1;39(3):305-13. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA98YM36CY

HACETTEPE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND CHEMİSTRY

Copyright © Hacettepe University Faculty of Science

http://www.hjbc.hacettepe.edu.tr/

https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hjbc