The Checklist of Terrestrial Vertebrate Fauna of Beytepe Campus, Hacettepe University
Year 2021,
Volume: 49 Issue: 1, 43 - 55, 01.01.2021
Mehmet Kürşat Şahin
,
Burak Akbaba
,
Şafak Bulut
,
Zafer Ayaş
Abstract
Beytepe Campus (Hacettepe University) is one of the very few large scaled interaction zones between urban and wildlife in Ankara metropolis, Turkey. However, up to now there is no checklist on the terrestrial (amphibian, reptile, avian and mammalian) vertebrate fauna of this campus has ever been published. Therefore, from 2005 to 2019, surveys were conducted at Beytepe Campus. The result of these surveys demonstrated that a total of 3 amphibians, 11 reptilians, 93 avian and 11 mammalian species were identified in the study area. Due to urbanization trends has ever-increasing taken a place in this metropolitan city (Ankara), this study will provide us a useful guide for forthcoming researches and conservation activities in similar areas.
Supporting Institution
Hacettepe University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit
Project Number
012 D10 601 001-46
References
- [1] S.T. Pickett, M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, C.H. Nilon, R.V. Pouyat, W.C. Zipperer, R. Costanza, Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 32 (2001) 127–157.
- [2] S.T. Pickett, M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms, Landscape and Urban Planning. 69 (2004) 369–384.
- [3] J. Niemelä, Ecology and urban planning, Biodiversity & Conservation. 8 (1999) 119–131.
- [4] D.C. Dearborn, S. Kark, Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity, Conservation Biology. 24 (2010) 432–440.
- [5] M.A. Goddard, A.J. Dougill, T.G. Benton, Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments, Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 25 (2010) 90–98.
- [6] B. Güneralp, K.C. Seto, Futures of global urban expansion: uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation, Environmental Research Letters. 8 (2013) 014025.
- [7] M.F. Aronson, C.A. Lepczyk, K.L. Evans, M.A. Goddard, S.B. Lerman, J.S. MacIvor, C.H. Nilon, T. Vargo, Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 15 (2017) 189–196.
- [8] X. Zhang, M.A. Friedl, C.B. Schaaf, A.H. Strahler, A. Schneider, The footprint of urban climates on vegetation phenology, Geophysical Research Letters. 31 (2004).
- [9] P. Faramarzi, DETERMINATION OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION IN PM2. 5 SAMPLES COLLECTED IN URBAN AND SEMI-URBAN TWO STATIONS IN ANKARA, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2018.
- [10] Climate:Ankara, Ankara_Climate. (n.d.). https://tr.climate-data.org/asya/tuerkiye/ankara/ankara-172/ (accessed April 10, 2020).
- [11] İ. Baran, Ç. Ilgaz, A. Avcı, Y. Kumlutaş, K. Olgun, Türkiye Amfibi ve Sürüngenleri [The Amphibians and Reptiles of Turkey]; Ankara Tübitak Popüler Bilim Kitapları no: 207, Semih Publishing House.[in Turkish], 2013.
- [12] AmphibiaWeb, (n.d.). https://amphibiaweb.org/ (accessed February 10, 2020).
- [13] THE REPTILE DATABASE, (n.d.). http://www.reptile-database.org/ (accessed June 10, 2019).
- [14] C.J.O. Harrison, field guide to the nests, eggs and nestlings of European birds, Collins, 1975.
- [15] H. Heinzel, R. Fitter, J. Parslow, A. Boyla, Türkiye’nin ve Avrupa’nın kuşları: Kuzey Afrika ve Ortadoğu dahil, Doğal Hayatı Koruma Derneği, 2002.
- [16] R. Brown, Tracks & signs of the birds of Britain & Europe, A&C Black, 2003.
- [17] D.S. Favre, International trade in endangered species: a guide to CITES [Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species], Brill, 1989.
- [18] P. Genovesi, C. Shine, European strategy on invasive alien species: Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Habitats (Bern Convention), Council of Europe, 2004.
- [19] S. IUCN, IUCN red list of threatened species, Version. 2017 (2017) 3.
- [20] J. Beninde, M. Veith, A. Hochkirch, Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta‐analysis of factors determining intra‐urban biodiversity variation, Ecology Letters. 18 (2015) 581–592.
Year 2021,
Volume: 49 Issue: 1, 43 - 55, 01.01.2021
Mehmet Kürşat Şahin
,
Burak Akbaba
,
Şafak Bulut
,
Zafer Ayaş
Project Number
012 D10 601 001-46
References
- [1] S.T. Pickett, M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, C.H. Nilon, R.V. Pouyat, W.C. Zipperer, R. Costanza, Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 32 (2001) 127–157.
- [2] S.T. Pickett, M.L. Cadenasso, J.M. Grove, Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms, Landscape and Urban Planning. 69 (2004) 369–384.
- [3] J. Niemelä, Ecology and urban planning, Biodiversity & Conservation. 8 (1999) 119–131.
- [4] D.C. Dearborn, S. Kark, Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity, Conservation Biology. 24 (2010) 432–440.
- [5] M.A. Goddard, A.J. Dougill, T.G. Benton, Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments, Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 25 (2010) 90–98.
- [6] B. Güneralp, K.C. Seto, Futures of global urban expansion: uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation, Environmental Research Letters. 8 (2013) 014025.
- [7] M.F. Aronson, C.A. Lepczyk, K.L. Evans, M.A. Goddard, S.B. Lerman, J.S. MacIvor, C.H. Nilon, T. Vargo, Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 15 (2017) 189–196.
- [8] X. Zhang, M.A. Friedl, C.B. Schaaf, A.H. Strahler, A. Schneider, The footprint of urban climates on vegetation phenology, Geophysical Research Letters. 31 (2004).
- [9] P. Faramarzi, DETERMINATION OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION IN PM2. 5 SAMPLES COLLECTED IN URBAN AND SEMI-URBAN TWO STATIONS IN ANKARA, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2018.
- [10] Climate:Ankara, Ankara_Climate. (n.d.). https://tr.climate-data.org/asya/tuerkiye/ankara/ankara-172/ (accessed April 10, 2020).
- [11] İ. Baran, Ç. Ilgaz, A. Avcı, Y. Kumlutaş, K. Olgun, Türkiye Amfibi ve Sürüngenleri [The Amphibians and Reptiles of Turkey]; Ankara Tübitak Popüler Bilim Kitapları no: 207, Semih Publishing House.[in Turkish], 2013.
- [12] AmphibiaWeb, (n.d.). https://amphibiaweb.org/ (accessed February 10, 2020).
- [13] THE REPTILE DATABASE, (n.d.). http://www.reptile-database.org/ (accessed June 10, 2019).
- [14] C.J.O. Harrison, field guide to the nests, eggs and nestlings of European birds, Collins, 1975.
- [15] H. Heinzel, R. Fitter, J. Parslow, A. Boyla, Türkiye’nin ve Avrupa’nın kuşları: Kuzey Afrika ve Ortadoğu dahil, Doğal Hayatı Koruma Derneği, 2002.
- [16] R. Brown, Tracks & signs of the birds of Britain & Europe, A&C Black, 2003.
- [17] D.S. Favre, International trade in endangered species: a guide to CITES [Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species], Brill, 1989.
- [18] P. Genovesi, C. Shine, European strategy on invasive alien species: Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Habitats (Bern Convention), Council of Europe, 2004.
- [19] S. IUCN, IUCN red list of threatened species, Version. 2017 (2017) 3.
- [20] J. Beninde, M. Veith, A. Hochkirch, Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta‐analysis of factors determining intra‐urban biodiversity variation, Ecology Letters. 18 (2015) 581–592.