Analyzing Literary Space through ‘The Spatial Triad’ by Henri Lefebvre in Orhan Pamuk’s ‘The Museum of Innocence’
Abstract
This paper aims to present a different approach to the notion of literary space in a work of literature with regards to Henri Lefebvre’s spatial triad. Orhan Pamuk’s representation of space in his acclaimed novel; The Museum of Innocence and the actual museum along with the narrative will be referred as the case study since it is a unique example of a narrative transforming into an architectural form. Lefebvre’s spatial triad –perceived, conceived, lived space– that looks at space as a social product, will be applied as an investigatory tool to understand the notion of literary space. Relying on the fact that space can be a narrative acting independently within the narrative itself, Pamuk’s design becomes an affluent space for everyday life objects, without which, a sense of inadequacy would occur all throughout the novel and the actual museum. Conclusively, the main principle behind the selection of Lefebvre over many other existing theories on space is that Lefebvre’s spatial categories has provided the necessary grounds and flexibility in explaining the transition from a literary work into an architectural one on account of his acknowledgement that it would be better if the space in literary texts could be represented architecturally.
Keywords
Literary space, Henri Lefebvre, spatial triad, Orhan Pamuk, The Museum of Innocence
References
- Almas, E. (2015). Representation, refuse and the urban context in Orhan Pamuk’s Museum(s) of Innocence. In T. Mullholland, N. Sierra (Eds.), Spatial perspectives, essays on literature and architecture (pp. 145–160). Berlin, Bern, Brussels: Peter Lang AG International Academic Publishers.
- Allmer, A. (2009). Orhan Pamuk’s Museum of Innocence: On architecture, narrative and the art of collecting. Architectural Research Quarterly, 13(02), 163–171.
- Bilgin, İ. (2008, September 29). Mimarının ağzından Masumiyet Müzesi. Personal interview by Burcu Karabaş. https://v3.arkitera.com/h34579-mimarinin-agzindan-masumiyet-muzesi.html
- Bolak, B. (2011). Narrative space in “The Black Book” by Orhan Pamuk. Riga: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
- Casey, E. (1997). The production of space or the heterogeneity of place: A commentary on Edward Dimendberg and Neil Smith. In A. Light, J. M. Smith (Eds.), The Production of Public Space (pp. 71-80). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- De Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Havik, K. (2012). Urban literacy. A scriptive approach to the experience, use and imagination of place [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Delft University of Technology.
- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.
- Martin, D. & Miller, B. (2003). Space and contentious politics. Mobilization, An International Quarterly, 8(2), 143–156. https://www2.clarku.edu/departments/geography/pdfs/Deb%20Martin/martin.miller.Pp.%20143-156.pdf
- Massey, D. (1992). Politics and space/time. New Left Review, 195, 65–84.