OECD K12 Eğitiminde: Evrensel Temel Değerler ve Dijital Becerilerin Bütünleşik Yeterlikler Kapsamında İncelenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışma, 21. yüzyıl becerilerinin geliştirilmesini amaçlayarak evrensel değerler ile dijital yeterliliklerin entegrasyonunu OECD K12 beceri çerçevesi temelinde ele almakta ve lise öğrencilerinin bütünleşik yeterlilikleri bağlamında değerlendirmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, lise öğrencilerinin değerler eğitimi, OECD K12 bütünleşik becerileri ve çapraz becerilerinin kesişim noktasında yer alan ve ortak beceriler olan iş birliği, eleştirel düşünme, empati ve kültürel farkındalık becerisi, iletişim becerileri, problem çözme ve yaratıcılık, sorumluluk ve etik bilinç, dijital okuryazarlık, öz yönetim ve disiplin becerilerine ne ölçüde hâkim olduklarını tespit etmektir. Çalışma Erzurum il genelinde Millî Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı özel ve devlet kurumunda öğrenim gören 741 lise öğrencisiyle nicel araştırma desenlerinden olan genel tarama modeline uygun bir şekilde yürütülmüştür. Bu kapsamda oluşturulup uzman görüşüne sunulduktan sonra 250 lise öğrencisine pilot, 741 lise öğrencisine ise asıl olarak uygulanan 22 maddelik ‘OECD K12 Tabanlı Bütünleşik Öğrenci Yeterlilikleri Ölçeği (BOYÖ)’ kullanılmıştır. Ölçek, araştırma izinleri sonrasında öğrencilere uygulanarak geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Bu kapsamda ölçeğin kapsam geçerlilik indeksi .94; KMO ve Bartlett’s Testi sonucu .96 çıkmış ve tek faktörden oluştuğu görülmüştür. Bunun yanı sıra Cronbach Alpha ve test yarılama sonuçları .96 ile .90 olarak tespit edilmiş ve ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak lise öğrencilerinin OECD K12 bütünleşik yeterlilikleri, çapraz beceriler ve değerler eğitimi ortak becerilerine vermiş oldukları cevapların aritmetik ortalamasının yüksek olduğu; cinsiyet, okul türü, kurum türü ve baba eğitim düzeyinde anlamlı bir farklılık yokken, sınıf düzeyi ve anne eğitim düzeyinde anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

• Bütünleşik Yeterlikler
• K12 Becerileri
• OECD
• 21. Yüzyıl Becerileri

Education in OECD K12: Examining Universal Core Values and Digital Skills within Integrated Competencies

Abstract

This study aims to develop 21st century skills by addressing the integration of universal values and digital competencies based on the OECD K12 skills framework and evaluates high school students in the context of integrated competencies. The aim of the study is to assess high school students' values education, OECD K12 integrated skills and cross-cutting skills, which are common skills such as collaboration, critical thinking, empathy and cultural awareness, communication skills, problem solving and creativity, responsibility and ethical awareness, digital literacy, self-management and discipline skills. The study was conducted in accordance with the general screening model, one of the quantitative research designs, with 741 high school students enrolled in private and public institutions affiliated with the Ministry of National Education throughout the province of Erzurum. In this context, the 22-item “OECD K12-Based Integrated Student Competency Scale (ISCS)” was developed, reviewed by experts, and then administered to 250 high school students as a pilot study and to 741 high school students as the main study. The scale was administered to students after obtaining research permits, and validity and reliability studies were conducted. In this context, the scale's content validity index was .94; the KMO and Bartlett's Test results were .96, and it was found to consist of a single factor. Additionally, Cronbach's Alpha and split-half test results were determined to be .96 and .90, respectively, and the scale was found to be valid and reliable. In conclusion, it was found that the arithmetic mean of high school students' responses to the OECD K12 integrated competencies, cross-curricular skills, and values education common skills was high; there were no significant differences in terms of gender, school type, institution type, and father's education level, while there were significant differences in terms of grade level and mother's education level.

Keywords

• Integrated Competencies
• K12 Skills
• OECD
• 21st Century Skills

References

1. Alejo, A., & Yao, H. (2022). Recovering Learning: Are Children and Youth on Track in Skills Development?”, Education Commission and UNICEF. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/recovering-learning-are-children-and-youth-track-skills-development-enar
2. Aşkar, P., & Altun, A. (2023). K-12 Skills Framework: A Study on the Turkey Holistic Model. National Education Journal, 52(1), 925-940. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1308740
3. Aşkar, P., Topçu, H. İ., Altun, A., Cırık, İ., & Kandırmaz, M. (2023). K-12 Skills Framework: A Study on the Comprehensive Model in Turkey. National Education Journal, 52(1), 925-940. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1308740
4. Aras, S., Ülker, A., & Altun, D. (2023). Analysis of the Preschool Education Program's K12 Skills Framework According to the Turkey Holistic Model Analysis of the Preschool Education Program's K12 Skills Framework According to the Turkey Holistic Model. National Education Journal, 52(1), 791-812. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309000
5. Balcı, A. (2021). Comparative Education Systems. Pegem Academy.
6. Binkley, J. M., Harris, S. R., Levangie, P. K., Pearl, M., Guglielmino, J., Kraus, V., & Rowden, D. (2012). Patient Perspectives on Breast Cancer Treatment Side Effects and the Prospective Surveillance Model for Physical Rehabilitation for Women with Breast Cancer. Cancer, 118(S8), 2207-2216. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27469
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Factor Analysis: Basic Concepts and Its Use in Scale Development. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 32(32) 470-483.
8. Cırık, İ., Genç, E., Demirel, E., & Yılmaz, M. İ. (2023). K12 Skills Framework Instructional Design Model: Key Elements. National Education Journal, 52(1), 997-1026. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1307715

9. Erkek, G. S. (2023). An Analysis of Middle School Turkish Textbooks Based on Speaking Skills Defined in the K-12 Skills Framework. National Education Journal, 52(1), 677-700. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1308356
10. Eşiyok, S., & Demircioğlu, M. (2022). Assessment of Industry 4.0 Levels in OECD Countries Using the CRITIC and CODAS Methods. Istanbul Commerce University Journal of Social Sciences, 21(43), 377-398. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.1076484
11. Gottschalk, F., & Weise, C. (2023). Digital Equity and Inclusion in Education: An Overview of Practice and Policy in OECD Countries. OECD Education Working Papers, 299, 1-77. https://doi.org/10.1787/7cb15030-en .
12. Gül, S. O. (2014). Differentiated Instruction and Adaptations. Ufuk University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences,3(5), 111-123.
13. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, Pearson Prentice Hall.
14. Harbelioğlu, M., & Güreli, T. (2022). K12 to College 21st Century Skills Study. Harmony of Science, 5(1), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.37215/bilar.1131175
15. Hilbert, M., & Lopez, P. (2011). The World’s Technological Capacity to Store, Communicate, and Compute Information. Science, 332(6). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200970
16. Karabey, B., & Erdoğan, A. (2023). K-12 Skills Framework Turkey Comprehensive Model: Defining Mathematics Domain Skills and Modeling Their Processes. National Education Journal, 52(1), 971-996. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309180
17. Karadağ, Ö. (2012). A Critical Look at the Turkish Language Course Curriculum in Terms of Comprehension Skills (Grades 6, 7, and 8). Republic University Journal of Social Sciences, 36(1), 97- 110.
18. Karasar, N. (2012). Scientific Research Methods (24th edition). Nobel Publishing House.
19. Létourneau, A., & Charland, P. (2023). Defining Research on Intelligent Tutoring Systems in K-12 Education. Iceri 2023 Proceedings, 6320-6320.
20. McClelland, D. C., & Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). Leadership Motive Pattern and Long-Term Success in Management. Journal of Applied psychology, 67(6), 737.
21. McKillup, S. (2011). Statistics Explained: An Introductory Guide for Life Scientists. Cambridge University Press.
22. Nasırcı, H., & Kerkez, B. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Countries Performing Well in PISA and Turkey Based on the K-12 Skills Framework. National Education Journal, 52(1), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309025
23. National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academy of Sciences.
24. Nickell, S., Nunziata, L., & Ochel, W. (2005). Unemployment in the OECD Since the 1960s: What Do We Know?. The Economic Journal, 115(500), 1-27.
25. OECD, (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. http://www.Oecd.Org/ education/2030-project/
26. Özhan, M. B., Taşgın, A., & Kandırmaz, M. (2023). K-12 Skills Framework: Social and Emotional Learning Skills in the Context of Turkey’s Holistic Model. Journal of National Education, 52(1), 1027-1054.
27. P21, (2015). Partnership for 21st Century Skills-Core Content Integration. https://www.marietta.edu/sites/default/files/documents/21st_century_skills_standards_book_2.pdf
28. Polat, Y., Deniz, K., & Kurtul, K. (2024). K12 Skills Framework Turkish Language Skills in the Context of the Turkey Holistic Model. National Education Journal, 53(241), 473-498. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309211
29. Tanaka, S. (2005). Parental Leave and Child Health Across OECD Countries. The Economic Journal, 115(501), 7-28.
30. Topkaya, E., & Çelik, H. (2009). Individual Differences in Education. Theory and Practice in Education, 5(2), 316-321.
31. Türnüklü, A. (2004). Social and Emotional Learning in Schools. Education Management in Theory and Practice, 37, 136-152.
32. UNESCO, (2018). UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers: Version 3. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
33. Ülkü, H. (2007). R&DInnovation, and Growth: Evidence from Four Manufacturing Sectors in OECD Countries. Oxford Economic Papers, 59(3), 513-535.
34. Valiente, O. (2010). In Education: Current Practice, International Comparative Research Evidence, and Policy Outcomes. OECD Education Working Papers, OECD Publications (NJ1).
35. Wodon, Q. (2019). Budget Savings From Private Primary and Secondary Schools in OECD and Partner Countries. Int'l J. Educ. L. & Pol'y, 15, 29.
36. Woodruffe, C. (1993). What is Meant by a Competency?. Leadership & organization development journal, 14(1), 29-36.
37. Yabaş, D., & Altun, S. (2009). Examining the Effect of Differentiated Instruction Design on Students’ Self-Efficacy Perceptions, Metacognitive Skills, and Academic Achievement. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37(37), 201-214.
38. Yakut, E. (2020). Comparing the Methods Used to Assess the Level of Development of Information and Communication Technologies in OECD Countries Using the MOORA and WASPAS Methods with the Copeland Method. Journal of Atatürk University Institute of Social Sciences, 24(3), 1275-1294.
39. Yaşlıoğlu, MM. (2017). Factor Analysis and Validity in the Social Sciences: The Use of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses. Istanbul University Faculty of Business Administration Journal, 46, 74-85.
40. Yoder, N., Atwell, M. N, Dodek, D., Dusenbury, L., Bridgeland, J. M., & Weissberg, R. (2020). Preparing Youth for the Workforce of Tomorrow: Cultivating the Social and Emotional Skills Employers Demand. Casel.
41. Yüksel, Z., & Çeliköz N (2021). Multiple Intelligence Scale for Elementary School Students: A Study of Validity and Reliability. Akdeniz University Journal of Education, 4 (1), 154-174.