Research Article

Relationships between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-level

Volume: 34 Number: 1 January 31, 2019
EN TR

Relationships between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-level

Abstract

Teacher cognition and teacher action are two interrelated concepts of teaching and thus ought to be studied together in-depth to understand the nature of teaching and its effect on educational achievement. Examining the relationship between language teachers’ cognitions and their actions has the potential to inform and guide current and future instructional practices in language teaching settings. From this point forth, this correlational study aims to answer in what way language teachers’ language learning cognitions may predict their language teaching practices. The data were collected from 606 instructors teaching English in various higher education institutions in Turkey by means of a cross-sectional inventory and then analyzed primarily through canonical correlation analysis. During the data analysis process, multivariate normality; linearity (among variables and linear composites); homoscedasticity; and multicollinearity were also evaluated. The general results indicated that the participants having competence-oriented approaches and executive learner preferences would exhibit adherence to traditional (conservative) pedagogy, but divergence from communicative practices in instructional planning and error correction. Similarly, the participants disfavoring legislative learners would tend to diverge from communicative practices in instructional planning and error correction; on the contrary they would reflect a tendency towards traditional (conservative) pedagogy.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrews, S. (2003). Teacher language awareness and the professional knowledge base of the L2 teacher. Language Awareness, 12(2), 81-95.
  2. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.
  3. Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
  4. Burns, A., Freeman, D., Edwards, E. (2015). Theorizing and studying the language-teaching mind: Mapping research on language teacher cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 585-601.
  5. Burns, A., & Knox, J. (2005). Realisation(s): Systemic-functional linguistics and the language classroom. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp. 235-259). New York: Springer.
  6. Chan, Y. (2008). Elementary school EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of multiple assessments. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 7(1), 37-62.
  7. Choi, J. (2008). Teacher-learners’ beliefs about proficiency goals and teaching methods for Korean secondary English education. English Teaching, 63(1), 3-27.
  8. Crookes, G. (2015). Redrawing the boundaries on theory, research, and practice concerning language teachers’ philosophies and language teacher cognition: Toward a critical perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 485–499.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 31, 2019

Submission Date

November 19, 2017

Acceptance Date

April 2, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 34 Number: 1

APA
Öztürk, M., & Yıldırım, A. (2019). Relationships between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-level. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(1), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018038544
AMA
1.Öztürk M, Yıldırım A. Relationships between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-level. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;34(1):145-159. doi:10.16986/HUJE.2018038544
Chicago
Öztürk, Mustafa, and Ali Yıldırım. 2019. “Relationships Between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-Level”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 34 (1): 145-59. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018038544.
EndNote
Öztürk M, Yıldırım A (January 1, 2019) Relationships between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-level. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 34 1 145–159.
IEEE
[1]M. Öztürk and A. Yıldırım, “Relationships between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-level”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 145–159, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2018038544.
ISNAD
Öztürk, Mustafa - Yıldırım, Ali. “Relationships Between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-Level”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 34/1 (January 1, 2019): 145-159. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018038544.
JAMA
1.Öztürk M, Yıldırım A. Relationships between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-level. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;34:145–159.
MLA
Öztürk, Mustafa, and Ali Yıldırım. “Relationships Between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-Level”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 34, no. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 145-59, doi:10.16986/HUJE.2018038544.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Öztürk, Ali Yıldırım. Relationships between Foreign Language Teachers’ Cognitions and Actions: Evidence from Instructors at Tertiary-level. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019 Jan. 1;34(1):145-59. doi:10.16986/HUJE.2018038544

Cited By