BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2013, Volume: 28 Issue: 28-1, 417 - 427, 01.06.2013

Şaziye Yaman Pelin Irgın

Abstract

The purpose of this study can be listed as describing a Turkish version of the Oral Communication Strategy Inventory (OCSI) developed by Nakatani (2006), obtaining evidence of the internal consistency reliabilities of OCSI, and providing evidence for the validity of OCSI in Turkish culture through the use of the factor analysis. The participants in this study were 823 Turkish students learning English as a foreign language, studying at high schools and universities in Mersin, Adana, and Hatay in Turkey. The results of the study indicated that OCSI is not a valid and reliable tool in Turkish culture. These results suggested that a listening strategy inventory can be developed to understand listening strategy preferences of Turkish students considering cultural differences.

Keywords

listening strategy oral communication strategy communication validity reliability

References

  • Call, E. (1985). Auditory short term memory, listening comprehension and the Input Hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 7657
  • Chamot, A.U., O’Malley, J. M., Kupper, L., & Impink-Hernandez, M. (1987). A study of learning strategies in foreign language instruction: First year report. InterAmerica Research Associates, Rosslyn, VA.
  • Chamot, A.U. (1993). Student responses to learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 3, 308-321.
  • Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
  • Cohen, A., & Chi, J. (2002). Language Strategy Use Inventory and Index. CARLA working paper. Minneapolis, MN: Center for advanced research on language acquisition.
  • Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L. & Chi, J. C. (2000). Language strategy use survey. Retrieved September 5, 2005, from http://www.carla.umn.edu/about/profiles/CohenPapers/Lg_Strat_Srvy.html
  • Chamot, A.U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 13
  • Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. London: Sage.
  • Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). Pui Mahwah, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gercek, F. (2000). The Effects of Prep Listening Classes on the Frequency of Listening Comprehension Strategy Use. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Anadolu University, Eskisehir.
  • Goh, C. (1998). How ESL Learners with Different Listening Abilities Use Comprehension Strategies and Tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2, 2, 124-147.
  • Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor Analysis. United States of America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 3, 367-383.
  • Gu, Y., Q, Wen, & Wu, D. (1995). How often is often? Reference ambiguities of the Likert-scale in language learning strategy research. Occasional papers in English language teaching. (Vol. 5, pp. 19–35). ELT Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  • Hsiao, T-Y., & Oxford, R. (2002). Comparing Theories of Language Learning Strategies: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 368-383.
  • Jung, E. H. (2003). The Role of Discourse Signalling Clues in Second Language Listening Comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87.
  • Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Lu, C. (2005). Growth strategies and merger patterns among small and medium-sized enterprises: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 22, 4, 681-99.
  • Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an Oral Communication Strategy Inventory. The Modern Language Journal. 90, 151-168. Nagle, S. J., & Sanders, S. L. (1986). Comprehension theory and second language pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly. 20, 1, 9-26. Nunan, D. (2002). Listening in language learning. In J.C. Richards & W.A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 238-241. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Malley, J.M., Chamot, A.U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, 4, 418-437.
  • O’Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. (1986). Development and psychometric testing of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL).
  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. USA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  • Oxford, R., & Burry-Stock, J.A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning. System, 23, 1, 1-23.
  • Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 3, 291-300.
  • Oxford, R., Nyikos, M., & Ehrman, M. E. (1988). Vive la difference? Reflections on sex differences in use of language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 21, 4, 321-329.
  • Padron, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (1988). The effect of ESL students' perceptions of their cognitive reading strategies on reading achievement. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 146-150.
  • Politzer, R. (1983). An Exploratory study of self-reported language learning behaviors and their relation to achievement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 54-65.
  • Politzer, R., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviours and their relation to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 103-123.
  • Purdie, N., & Oliver, R. (1999). Language learning strategies used by bilingual school-aged children, System 27, 375-388.
  • Rost, M. (1994). Introducing listening. London: Penguin.
  • Rost, M. (2007). Commentary. I’m only trying to help: A role for interventions in teaching listening. Language Learning and Technology, 11, 1, 102-108.
  • Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive process in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 2, 117-131.
  • Tamada, Y. (1996). Japanese Learners’ Language Learning Strategies: The Relationship Between Learners’ Personal Factors and Their Choices of Language Learning Strategies. Master’s Thesis, Lancaster University.
  • Teng, H. C. (1996). An investigation of EFL listening strategies used by college freshmen in Taiwan. Research report submitted to National Science Council (NSC85-2418-H-224-002).
  • Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29, 3, 331-342.
  • Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Cinderella of communication strategies: Reception strategies in interactive listening. Modern Language Journal, 81, 4.
  • Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to Learn or Learn to Listen?, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 24, 3. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org.
  • Wright, D. B. (1997). Understanding statistics: an introduction for the social sciences. London: Sage.

The Validity and Reliability Studies of the Oral Communication Strategy Inventory

Year 2013, Volume: 28 Issue: 28-1, 417 - 427, 01.06.2013

Şaziye Yaman Pelin Irgın

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Nakatani (2006) tarafından geliştirilen Sözel İletişim Stratejileri Envanteri’nin (SİSE) Türkçeye adapte edilmesidir. Ayrıca, bu envanter için faktör analizi kullanılarak SİSE’nin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarının yapılması hedeflenmiştir. Çalışmaya, Türkiye’nin Mersin, Adana, ve Hatay illerindeki üniversite ve liselerden 823 öğrenci katılmıştır. Bulgular SİSE’nin Türk kültüründe geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olmadığını göstermektedir. Aynı zamanda bulgular, Türk öğrencilerinin kültürel farklılıklarını göz önünde bulundurarak dinleme strateji tercihlerini anlamak için dinleme strateji envanteri geliştirilebildiğini belirtmektedir.

Keywords

dinleme stratejisi sözel iletişim stratejisi iletişim geçerlik güvenirlik

References

  • Call, E. (1985). Auditory short term memory, listening comprehension and the Input Hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 7657
  • Chamot, A.U., O’Malley, J. M., Kupper, L., & Impink-Hernandez, M. (1987). A study of learning strategies in foreign language instruction: First year report. InterAmerica Research Associates, Rosslyn, VA.
  • Chamot, A.U. (1993). Student responses to learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 3, 308-321.
  • Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
  • Cohen, A., & Chi, J. (2002). Language Strategy Use Inventory and Index. CARLA working paper. Minneapolis, MN: Center for advanced research on language acquisition.
  • Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L. & Chi, J. C. (2000). Language strategy use survey. Retrieved September 5, 2005, from http://www.carla.umn.edu/about/profiles/CohenPapers/Lg_Strat_Srvy.html
  • Chamot, A.U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 13
  • Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. London: Sage.
  • Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). Pui Mahwah, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gercek, F. (2000). The Effects of Prep Listening Classes on the Frequency of Listening Comprehension Strategy Use. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Anadolu University, Eskisehir.
  • Goh, C. (1998). How ESL Learners with Different Listening Abilities Use Comprehension Strategies and Tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2, 2, 124-147.
  • Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor Analysis. United States of America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 3, 367-383.
  • Gu, Y., Q, Wen, & Wu, D. (1995). How often is often? Reference ambiguities of the Likert-scale in language learning strategy research. Occasional papers in English language teaching. (Vol. 5, pp. 19–35). ELT Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  • Hsiao, T-Y., & Oxford, R. (2002). Comparing Theories of Language Learning Strategies: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 368-383.
  • Jung, E. H. (2003). The Role of Discourse Signalling Clues in Second Language Listening Comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87.
  • Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  • Lu, C. (2005). Growth strategies and merger patterns among small and medium-sized enterprises: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 22, 4, 681-99.
  • Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an Oral Communication Strategy Inventory. The Modern Language Journal. 90, 151-168. Nagle, S. J., & Sanders, S. L. (1986). Comprehension theory and second language pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly. 20, 1, 9-26. Nunan, D. (2002). Listening in language learning. In J.C. Richards & W.A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 238-241. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Malley, J.M., Chamot, A.U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, 4, 418-437.
  • O’Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. (1986). Development and psychometric testing of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL).
  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. USA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  • Oxford, R., & Burry-Stock, J.A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning. System, 23, 1, 1-23.
  • Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 3, 291-300.
  • Oxford, R., Nyikos, M., & Ehrman, M. E. (1988). Vive la difference? Reflections on sex differences in use of language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 21, 4, 321-329.
  • Padron, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (1988). The effect of ESL students' perceptions of their cognitive reading strategies on reading achievement. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 146-150.
  • Politzer, R. (1983). An Exploratory study of self-reported language learning behaviors and their relation to achievement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 54-65.
  • Politzer, R., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviours and their relation to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 103-123.
  • Purdie, N., & Oliver, R. (1999). Language learning strategies used by bilingual school-aged children, System 27, 375-388.
  • Rost, M. (1994). Introducing listening. London: Penguin.
  • Rost, M. (2007). Commentary. I’m only trying to help: A role for interventions in teaching listening. Language Learning and Technology, 11, 1, 102-108.
  • Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive process in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 2, 117-131.
  • Tamada, Y. (1996). Japanese Learners’ Language Learning Strategies: The Relationship Between Learners’ Personal Factors and Their Choices of Language Learning Strategies. Master’s Thesis, Lancaster University.
  • Teng, H. C. (1996). An investigation of EFL listening strategies used by college freshmen in Taiwan. Research report submitted to National Science Council (NSC85-2418-H-224-002).
  • Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29, 3, 331-342.
  • Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Cinderella of communication strategies: Reception strategies in interactive listening. Modern Language Journal, 81, 4.
  • Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to Learn or Learn to Listen?, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 24, 3. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org.
  • Wright, D. B. (1997). Understanding statistics: an introduction for the social sciences. London: Sage.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Şaziye Yaman This is me

Pelin Irgın This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 28 Issue: 28-1

Cite

APA Yaman, Ş., & Irgın, P. (2013). The Validity and Reliability Studies of the Oral Communication Strategy Inventory. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28-1), 417-427.