BibTex RIS Cite

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Canlı Türlerine Yönelik Değer Yönelimleri

Year 2010, Volume: 39 Issue: 39, 132 - 141, 01.06.2010

Sevilay Dervişoğlu

Abstract

Bu araştırmada üniversite öğrencilerinin canlı türlerine yönelik değer yönelimleri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır.Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu yirmi dört üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmuştur. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme yoluylatoplanmış ve Kellert’in değer yönelimi tipolojisi temel alınarak nitel içerik analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmasonucunda canlı türlerine yönelik baskın değer yönelimleri bakımından öğrenci profilleri ortaya çıkmıştır. Üniversiteöğrencilerinin büyük bir bölümünde canlı türleriyle ilgili “insan merkezli çevreci” değer yöneliminin baskın olduğu tespitedilmiştir

Keywords

canlı türleri biyolojik çeşitlilik değer yönelimleri

References

  • CBD- Convention on Biological Diversity (1992). Rio de Janeiro: World Conference on Sustainable Development.
  • Dervişoğlu, S. (2007). Biyolojik Çeşitliliğin Korunmasına Yönelik Eğitim İçin Öğrenme Ön Koşulları. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G. & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
  • Gutierrez Karp, D. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111-133.
  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, 1243-1248.
  • Hunter, M. L. & Brehm, J. M. (2004). A Qualitative Examination of Value Orientations Toward Wildlife and Biodiversity by Rural Residents of the Intermountain Region. Human Ecology Review, 11 (1), 13-26.
  • Kellert, S. 1996. The Value of Life: Biological Diversity and Human Society. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2005). ’Loveable’ mammals and ’lifeless’ plants: How children’s interests in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. International Journal of Science Education 27, 655–677.
  • Mayer, J. (1996). Biodiversitätsforschung als Zukunftsdisziplin, Berichte des Instituts für Didaktik der Biologie, 5, 19-41.
  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. 7. Aufl., Deutscher Studien Verlag, Weinheim, 135 s.
  • Menzel, S. & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Values, Beliefs and Norms That Foster Chilean and German Pupils’ Commitment to Protect Biodiversity. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(1), 31-49.
  • Mittermeier, R. A., Robles Gil, P., Hoffmann, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittermeier, C. G., Lamoreux, J. & da Fonseca, G. A. B. (2004). Hotspots Revisited. Mexico: CEMEX.
  • Özdemir, C. (2010). Türk Eğitim Sisteminde Biyolojik Çeşitlilik. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Prokop, P., Özel, M. & Uşak, M. (2009). Cross-Cultural Comparison of Student Attitudes toward Snakes. Society and Animals, 17 (3), 224-240.
  • Schultz, W. P. , Shriver , C., Tabanico J. J. & Khazian, A., M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (1), 31-42.
  • Schultz, W. P. & Zelezny, L. (1998). Values and proenvironmental behaviour. A five-county survery. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 29, 540-558
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents ofhuman values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407- 424.
  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6, 81-97.
  • Thompson, S., C. & Barton, M., A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14 (2), 149-157.
  • Tisdell, C. & Wilson, C. (2006). Information, wildlife valuation, conservation: Experiments and policy. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24, 144–159.
  • UBSEP (2008). Ulusal Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Stratejisi Eylem Planı (online). www.bcs.org (28.11.2008).
  • Yörek, N., Şahin, M. & Aydın, H. (2009). Are Animals ‘More Alive’ than Plants? Animistic-Anthropocentric Construction of Life Concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5 (4), 369-378.
  • Yörek, N. (2009). The Only Good Snake Is A Dead Snake: Secondary School Students’ Attitudes Toward Snakes.
  • Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 23 (2), 31-35.

Year 2010, Volume: 39 Issue: 39, 132 - 141, 01.06.2010

Sevilay Dervişoğlu

Abstract

References

  • CBD- Convention on Biological Diversity (1992). Rio de Janeiro: World Conference on Sustainable Development.
  • Dervişoğlu, S. (2007). Biyolojik Çeşitliliğin Korunmasına Yönelik Eğitim İçin Öğrenme Ön Koşulları. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G. & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
  • Gutierrez Karp, D. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111-133.
  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, 1243-1248.
  • Hunter, M. L. & Brehm, J. M. (2004). A Qualitative Examination of Value Orientations Toward Wildlife and Biodiversity by Rural Residents of the Intermountain Region. Human Ecology Review, 11 (1), 13-26.
  • Kellert, S. 1996. The Value of Life: Biological Diversity and Human Society. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2005). ’Loveable’ mammals and ’lifeless’ plants: How children’s interests in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. International Journal of Science Education 27, 655–677.
  • Mayer, J. (1996). Biodiversitätsforschung als Zukunftsdisziplin, Berichte des Instituts für Didaktik der Biologie, 5, 19-41.
  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. 7. Aufl., Deutscher Studien Verlag, Weinheim, 135 s.
  • Menzel, S. & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Values, Beliefs and Norms That Foster Chilean and German Pupils’ Commitment to Protect Biodiversity. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(1), 31-49.
  • Mittermeier, R. A., Robles Gil, P., Hoffmann, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittermeier, C. G., Lamoreux, J. & da Fonseca, G. A. B. (2004). Hotspots Revisited. Mexico: CEMEX.
  • Özdemir, C. (2010). Türk Eğitim Sisteminde Biyolojik Çeşitlilik. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Prokop, P., Özel, M. & Uşak, M. (2009). Cross-Cultural Comparison of Student Attitudes toward Snakes. Society and Animals, 17 (3), 224-240.
  • Schultz, W. P. , Shriver , C., Tabanico J. J. & Khazian, A., M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (1), 31-42.
  • Schultz, W. P. & Zelezny, L. (1998). Values and proenvironmental behaviour. A five-county survery. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 29, 540-558
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents ofhuman values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407- 424.
  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6, 81-97.
  • Thompson, S., C. & Barton, M., A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14 (2), 149-157.
  • Tisdell, C. & Wilson, C. (2006). Information, wildlife valuation, conservation: Experiments and policy. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24, 144–159.
  • UBSEP (2008). Ulusal Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Stratejisi Eylem Planı (online). www.bcs.org (28.11.2008).
  • Yörek, N., Şahin, M. & Aydın, H. (2009). Are Animals ‘More Alive’ than Plants? Animistic-Anthropocentric Construction of Life Concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5 (4), 369-378.
  • Yörek, N. (2009). The Only Good Snake Is A Dead Snake: Secondary School Students’ Attitudes Toward Snakes.
  • Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 23 (2), 31-35.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Sevilay Dervişoğlu This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 39 Issue: 39

Cite

APA Dervişoğlu, S. (2010). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Canlı Türlerine Yönelik Değer Yönelimleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(39), 132-141.