BibTex RIS Cite

BİLGİSAYAR ÖĞRETMENLERİ İÇİN "BİLGİSAYAR ÖĞRETMENLİĞİ ÖZ-YETERLİK ÖLÇEĞİ" GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI

Year 2005, Volume: 29 Issue: 29, 1 - 8, 01.06.2005

References

  • Akkoyunlu B. ve Orhan. F. (2003). Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü öğrencilerinin bilgisayar kullanma öz yeterlik inancı ile demografik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki [Elektronik versiyonu]. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 2(3).
  • Albion, P. (2000). Preliminary investigation of some influences on student teachers’ self efficacy for teaching with computers. AACE. 76(4), 569—582.
  • Allinder, R. M. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum based measurement snd student achievement. Remedial & Special Education, 27, 141-152.
  • Ashton, P. T. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32.
  • Aşkar, P. ve Umay. A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz yeterlik algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21 . 1—8.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • “Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Encylopea’ia of Human Behaviour (Ed. V.S. Ramachaudran), 4. 71—78. 04.09.2005 tarihinde www.des.emory.edu/mfp/BanEncy.html adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-eşicacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman Company.
  • Cassidy, S. ve Eachus. P. (2001 ). Developing the computer self-eŞicacy (CSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between CSE, gender and experience with computers. 14.04.2003 tarihinde www.chssc.salford.ac.uk/healthSci/selfeff/selfeff.htm adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Compeau. D. R. Ve Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self—efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, June, 189—21 1.
  • Fritz. J. J., Miller-Hey]. J., Kreutzer, J. C., ve MacPhee, D. (1995). Fostering Personel teaching efficacy through staff development and classroom activities. Journal of Educational Research, 88(4), 200-209.
  • Gibson. S., ve Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76(4), 569-582.
  • Hill, T.. Smith. N. D., & Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 307-313.
  • Karsten, R. Ve Roth, M. R. (1998). The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses. Journal of Research on Technology Education, 31(1), 14-24. BııketAKKOYUNLU. Feza ORHAN, Ayxıın UMAY/ H. U Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education). 29 (2005), 1—8 7
  • Kinzie, M. 8. ve Delcourt. M. A. B. (1991). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement ofattitudes and self-efficacy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED331891).
  • Koul. R. ve Rubba. P. (1999). An analysis of the reliability and validity of personal internet teaching efficacy beliefs scale. Electronic Journal of Science Education. 27.12.2002 tarihinde http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/koulrubba.html adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Loyd, B. H. ve Gressard. C. P. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.
  • Midgley,C., Feldlaufer. H. ve Eccles. J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self— and task related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal ofEducational Pschology. 81 (2). 247-258.
  • Ross. J. A. (1994). The impact of an inservice to promote cooperative learning on the stability of teacher efŞcacy. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10. 381-394.
  • Saklot‘ske. D. H., Michayluk. C. 0. ve Randhawa. B. S. (1988). Teacher efficacy and teaching behaviors. Psychological Social Behavior and Personality. 5. 465-472.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self—efŞcacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the School, 22. 208-223.
  • Ross. J. A. (1994). The impact of an inservice to promote cooperative learning on the stability of teacher efŞcacy. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10, 381-394.
  • Tschannen -Moran, M.. Woolfolk-Hoy, A. ve Hoy. W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research. 68, 202-248.
  • Tuckman. B. W. ve Sexton. T. L. (1990). The relationship between self- beliefs and self— regulated performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1 1 1-1 17.
  • Wooll'olk. A. E. ve Hoy. W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and belief about control. Journal of Educational Psychology. 82(1), 81-91.
  • Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu. (1998). Eğitim fakülteleri öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının yeniden yapılandırılması raporu. Ankara.
Year 2005, Volume: 29 Issue: 29, 1 - 8, 01.06.2005

References

  • Akkoyunlu B. ve Orhan. F. (2003). Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü öğrencilerinin bilgisayar kullanma öz yeterlik inancı ile demografik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki [Elektronik versiyonu]. The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 2(3).
  • Albion, P. (2000). Preliminary investigation of some influences on student teachers’ self efficacy for teaching with computers. AACE. 76(4), 569—582.
  • Allinder, R. M. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum based measurement snd student achievement. Remedial & Special Education, 27, 141-152.
  • Ashton, P. T. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32.
  • Aşkar, P. ve Umay. A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz yeterlik algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21 . 1—8.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • “Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Encylopea’ia of Human Behaviour (Ed. V.S. Ramachaudran), 4. 71—78. 04.09.2005 tarihinde www.des.emory.edu/mfp/BanEncy.html adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-eşicacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman Company.
  • Cassidy, S. ve Eachus. P. (2001 ). Developing the computer self-eŞicacy (CSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between CSE, gender and experience with computers. 14.04.2003 tarihinde www.chssc.salford.ac.uk/healthSci/selfeff/selfeff.htm adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Compeau. D. R. Ve Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self—efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, June, 189—21 1.
  • Fritz. J. J., Miller-Hey]. J., Kreutzer, J. C., ve MacPhee, D. (1995). Fostering Personel teaching efficacy through staff development and classroom activities. Journal of Educational Research, 88(4), 200-209.
  • Gibson. S., ve Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76(4), 569-582.
  • Hill, T.. Smith. N. D., & Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 307-313.
  • Karsten, R. Ve Roth, M. R. (1998). The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses. Journal of Research on Technology Education, 31(1), 14-24. BııketAKKOYUNLU. Feza ORHAN, Ayxıın UMAY/ H. U Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education). 29 (2005), 1—8 7
  • Kinzie, M. 8. ve Delcourt. M. A. B. (1991). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement ofattitudes and self-efficacy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED331891).
  • Koul. R. ve Rubba. P. (1999). An analysis of the reliability and validity of personal internet teaching efficacy beliefs scale. Electronic Journal of Science Education. 27.12.2002 tarihinde http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/koulrubba.html adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Loyd, B. H. ve Gressard. C. P. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.
  • Midgley,C., Feldlaufer. H. ve Eccles. J. S. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self— and task related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal ofEducational Pschology. 81 (2). 247-258.
  • Ross. J. A. (1994). The impact of an inservice to promote cooperative learning on the stability of teacher efŞcacy. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10. 381-394.
  • Saklot‘ske. D. H., Michayluk. C. 0. ve Randhawa. B. S. (1988). Teacher efficacy and teaching behaviors. Psychological Social Behavior and Personality. 5. 465-472.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self—efŞcacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the School, 22. 208-223.
  • Ross. J. A. (1994). The impact of an inservice to promote cooperative learning on the stability of teacher efŞcacy. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10, 381-394.
  • Tschannen -Moran, M.. Woolfolk-Hoy, A. ve Hoy. W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research. 68, 202-248.
  • Tuckman. B. W. ve Sexton. T. L. (1990). The relationship between self- beliefs and self— regulated performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1 1 1-1 17.
  • Wooll'olk. A. E. ve Hoy. W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and belief about control. Journal of Educational Psychology. 82(1), 81-91.
  • Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu. (1998). Eğitim fakülteleri öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının yeniden yapılandırılması raporu. Ankara.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Buket Akkoyunlu This is me

Feza Orhan This is me

Aysun Umay This is me

Aysun Umay This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2005
Published in Issue Year 2005 Volume: 29 Issue: 29

Cite

APA Akkoyunlu, B., Orhan, F., Umay, A., Umay, A. (2005). BİLGİSAYAR ÖĞRETMENLERİ İÇİN "BİLGİSAYAR ÖĞRETMENLİĞİ ÖZ-YETERLİK ÖLÇEĞİ" GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(29), 1-8.