Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE TWO FACES OF UNİONİST MOVEMENTS: THE ANALYSİS OF İTS IMPACT ON THE ECONOMİC GROWTH İN OECD COUNTRİES

Year 2014, Volume: 32 Issue: 1, 1 - 27, 30.06.2014

Merter Akıncı , Gönül Yüce Akıncı , Ömer Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.17065/huiibf.96868
Cited By: 1

Abstract

The Two Faces of Unionist Movements: The Analysis of its Impact on the Economic Growth in OECD Countries Even though identifying the causes of economic growth has been the subject of numerous empirical studies, little is known about the impact of unionist movements on differences in the process of economic growth between the countries. Besides, there is still no consensus on how unions affect a state’s economy. Therefore, in this study the impact of unionist movements on economic growth in 33 OECD countries from 1970 to 2011 is examined by using panel data analysis. The results of the analysis show that there are both cointegration and causality relationship between the unionist movements and economic growth. In addition, it is found that an increase in unionist movements would impact the process of economic growth negatively

Keywords

Unionist movements economic growth panel data analysis

References

  • Armstrong, P., J. Steenkamp (2008) “South African Trade Unions: An Overview for 1995 to 2005”, Stellenbosch Economic Working Paper, 10/08, 1-56.
  • Asteriou, D., V. Monastiriotis (2001) “Trade Unionism and Growth: A Panel Data Study”, University of Reading Discussion Paper, 429, 1-19.
  • Booth, A.L. (1994) The Economics of the Trade Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boyer, R. (1995) “The Future of Unions: Is the Anglo-Saxon Model a Fatality or Will Contrasting National Trajectories Persist?”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33(4), 545-556.
  • Brooks, C. (2008) Introductory Econometrics for Finance, (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brown, C., J. Medoff (1978) “Trade Unions in the Production Process”, Journal of Political Economy, 86(3), 355-378.
  • Chang, J.J., M. Shaw, C.C. Lai (2007) “A ‘Managerial’ Trade Union and Economic Growth”. European Economic Review, 51(2), 365-384.
  • Charemza, W.W., D.F. Deadman (1993) New Directions in Econometric Practice, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Crouch, C. (1993) Industrial Relations and European State Traditions, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Çetintaş, H., A. Şenkal, H. Başel (2008) “Unionization, Unemployment and Economic Growth; Case of Turkey”, Serbian Journal of Management, 3(2), 157-170.
  • DeFina, R.H. (1983) “Unions, Relative Wages and Economic Efficiency”, Journal of Labor Economics, 1(4), 408-429.
  • Dompierre, M.B. (1986) “The Role of Unions in African Economic Development”, The Developing Economies, 24(1), 71-85.
  • Ebbinghaus, B., J. Visser (1999) “When Institutions Matter: Union Growth and Decline in Western Europe, 1950-1995”, European Sociological Review, 15(2), 135- 158.
  • Ekin, N. (1996) “Değişim ve Sendikaların Geleceği”, Mercek, 2, 15-23.
  • Freeman, R.B., J. Medoff (1979) “The Two Faces of Unionism”, The Public Interest, 57, 69-93.
  • Freeman, R.B., J. Medoff (1984) What Do Unions Do?, New York: Basic Books.
  • Georgiou, M.N. (2010) “Trade Unions and Economic Growth: A Discussion Based on Panel Data Analysis (1999-2007)”, SSRN Working Paper, 1-7.
  • Ghosh, P., S. Nandan, A. Gupta (2009) “The Changing Roles of Trade Unions in India: A Case Study of National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), Unchahar”, Asian Academy of Management, 14(1), 37-57.
  • Granger, C.W.J. (1964) Spectral Analysis of Economic Time Series, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Granger, C.W.J. (1969) “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods”, Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
  • Grieben, W.H., F. Şener (2008) “Labor Unions, Globalization and Endogenous Growth”, CESifo-Delphi Conferences on Government, Institutions and Macroeconomic Performance, 30-31 May 2008, Munich, 1-43.
  • Hamilton, J.D. (1994) Time Series Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Hausman, J. A., W.E. Taylor (1981) “Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects”, Econometrica, 49(6), 1377-1398.
  • Holcombe, R.G., J.D. Gwartney (2010) “Unions, Economic Freedom and Growth”, Cato Journal, 30(1), 1-22.
  • Irmen, A., B.U. Wigger (2002) “Trade Union Objectives and Economic Growth”, FinanzArchiv, 59(1), 49-67.
  • Judge, G.G. (1985) The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
  • Kao, C. (1999) “Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data”, Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1-44.
  • Kaya, V., Ö. Yılmaz (2006) “Bölgesel Enflasyon Bölgesel Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye İçin Zaman Serisi ve Panel Veri Analizleri”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 21(247), 62-78.
  • Kaynak, M. (2009) Kalkınma İktisadı, (3. Baskı), Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Kerr, C. (1983) The Future of Industrial Societies: Convergence or Continuing Diversity?, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Kim, D.K. (2005) “Unionization, Unemployment and Growth in Korea: A Cointegration Approach”, Atlantic Economic Journal, 33(2), 225-233.
  • Koray, M. (1992) Endüstri İlişkileri, İzmir: Basisen Eğitim ve Kültür Yayınları.
  • Kozak, İ.E. (1992) “İşçi Sendikalarının Tarihi Gelişimi (İngiltere Örneği)”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 37, 63-81.
  • Kutlar, A. (2007) Ekonometriye Giriş, (1. Baskı), Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Lee, C.C. (2005) “Energy Consumption and GDP in Developing Countries: A Cointegrated Panel Analysis”, Energy Economics, 27(3), 415-427.
  • Lingens, J. (2002) “Growth and Employment Effects of Unions in a Simple Endogenous Growth Model”, University of Kassel Working Paper, 1-25.
  • Mehta, A. (1957) “The Mediating Role of the Trade Union in Underdeveloped Countries”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 6(1), 16-23.
  • Muir, J. D., J.L. Brown (1974) “Trade Union Power and the Process of Economic Development: The Kenyan Example”, Industrial Relations, 29(3), 474-496.
  • Ng, I., J. McCallum (1989) “Trade Unions, Economic Growth and Politics”, The Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(3), 372-384.
  • Oswald, A.J. (1982) “Trade Unions, Wages and Unemployment: What Can Simple Models Tell Us”, Oxford Economic Papers, 34(3), 526-545.
  • Palokangas, T. (1996) “Endogenous Growth and Collective Bargaining”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 20(5), 925-944.
  • Pantuosco, L.J., D. Parker, G. Stone (2001) “The Effect of Unions on Labor Markets and Economic Growth: An Analysis of State Data”, Journal of Labor Research, 22(1), 195-205.
  • Pantuosco, L. J. and W. Seyfried (2008) “The Effect of Public and Private Unions on State Economic Activity: Evaluating the Benefits to Organized Workers, Policy Makers and Companies”, Journal of Business&Economics Research, 6(2), 27-40.
  • Parreno, J.M.R., F. Sanchez-Losada (2002) “The Role of Unions in an Endogenous Growth Model With Human Capital”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 24(2), 171-192.
  • Pazarlıoğlu, M.V., Ö.K. Gürler (2007) “Telekomünikasyon Yatırımları ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Panel Veri Yaklaşımı”, Finans Politik&Ekonomik Yorumlar, 44(508), 35-43.
  • Pedroni, P. (1999) “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1), 653-670.
  • Pencavel, J. (1999) “The Role of Labor Unions in Fostering Economic Development”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1469, 1-27.
  • Şenkal, A. (1999) Sendikasız Endüstri İlişkileri: Genel Olarak Dünyada ve Türkiye’de, Ankara: Kamu-İş Yayınları.
  • Vedder, R., L. Gallaway (2002) “The Economic Effects of Labor Unions Revisited”, Journal of Labor Research, 23(1), 105-130.
  • Wooldridge, J.M. (2009) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, (4th ed.), Ohio: Cengage Learning.
  • Yılmaz, E. (2010) “Türkiye’de İşçi Sendikalarının Siyasal ve Sosyolojik Özellikleri Üzerinden Tarihsel Süreç İçinde Değerlendirilmesi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 195-207.

SENDİKAL HAREKETLERİN İKİ YÜZÜ: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ANALİZİ

Year 2014, Volume: 32 Issue: 1, 1 - 27, 30.06.2014

Merter Akıncı , Gönül Yüce Akıncı , Ömer Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.17065/huiibf.96868
Cited By: 1

Abstract

İktisadi büyümenin nedenlerini açıklamayı konu edinen çok sayıda uygulamalı çalısma olmasına ragmen, ülkeler arasında iktisadi büyüme sürecindeki farklılıklar üzerinde yarattıgı etkiler nedeniyle sendikal hareketler hakkında çok az sey bilinmektedir. Ayrıca, sendikaların ülke ekonomisini nasıl etkiledigi konusunda da hala bir konsensüs saglanamamıstır. Bu amaçla, çalısmada sendikal hareketlerin iktisadi büyüme üzerindeki etkileri 33 OECD ülkesinde 1970–2011 dönemi için panel veri analizleri kullanılarak arastırılmıstır. Analiz sonuçları, sendikal hareketler ile iktisadi büyüme arasında hem esbütünlesme ve hem de nedensellik iliskisi oldugunu göstermistir. laveten, sendikal hareketlerde meydana gelen bir artısın iktisadi büyüme sürecini negatif yönlü etkileyecegi de tespit edilmistir. 

Keywords

Sendikal hareketler iktisadi büyüme panel veri analizi

References

  • Armstrong, P., J. Steenkamp (2008) “South African Trade Unions: An Overview for 1995 to 2005”, Stellenbosch Economic Working Paper, 10/08, 1-56.
  • Asteriou, D., V. Monastiriotis (2001) “Trade Unionism and Growth: A Panel Data Study”, University of Reading Discussion Paper, 429, 1-19.
  • Booth, A.L. (1994) The Economics of the Trade Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boyer, R. (1995) “The Future of Unions: Is the Anglo-Saxon Model a Fatality or Will Contrasting National Trajectories Persist?”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33(4), 545-556.
  • Brooks, C. (2008) Introductory Econometrics for Finance, (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brown, C., J. Medoff (1978) “Trade Unions in the Production Process”, Journal of Political Economy, 86(3), 355-378.
  • Chang, J.J., M. Shaw, C.C. Lai (2007) “A ‘Managerial’ Trade Union and Economic Growth”. European Economic Review, 51(2), 365-384.
  • Charemza, W.W., D.F. Deadman (1993) New Directions in Econometric Practice, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Crouch, C. (1993) Industrial Relations and European State Traditions, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Çetintaş, H., A. Şenkal, H. Başel (2008) “Unionization, Unemployment and Economic Growth; Case of Turkey”, Serbian Journal of Management, 3(2), 157-170.
  • DeFina, R.H. (1983) “Unions, Relative Wages and Economic Efficiency”, Journal of Labor Economics, 1(4), 408-429.
  • Dompierre, M.B. (1986) “The Role of Unions in African Economic Development”, The Developing Economies, 24(1), 71-85.
  • Ebbinghaus, B., J. Visser (1999) “When Institutions Matter: Union Growth and Decline in Western Europe, 1950-1995”, European Sociological Review, 15(2), 135- 158.
  • Ekin, N. (1996) “Değişim ve Sendikaların Geleceği”, Mercek, 2, 15-23.
  • Freeman, R.B., J. Medoff (1979) “The Two Faces of Unionism”, The Public Interest, 57, 69-93.
  • Freeman, R.B., J. Medoff (1984) What Do Unions Do?, New York: Basic Books.
  • Georgiou, M.N. (2010) “Trade Unions and Economic Growth: A Discussion Based on Panel Data Analysis (1999-2007)”, SSRN Working Paper, 1-7.
  • Ghosh, P., S. Nandan, A. Gupta (2009) “The Changing Roles of Trade Unions in India: A Case Study of National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), Unchahar”, Asian Academy of Management, 14(1), 37-57.
  • Granger, C.W.J. (1964) Spectral Analysis of Economic Time Series, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Granger, C.W.J. (1969) “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods”, Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
  • Grieben, W.H., F. Şener (2008) “Labor Unions, Globalization and Endogenous Growth”, CESifo-Delphi Conferences on Government, Institutions and Macroeconomic Performance, 30-31 May 2008, Munich, 1-43.
  • Hamilton, J.D. (1994) Time Series Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Hausman, J. A., W.E. Taylor (1981) “Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects”, Econometrica, 49(6), 1377-1398.
  • Holcombe, R.G., J.D. Gwartney (2010) “Unions, Economic Freedom and Growth”, Cato Journal, 30(1), 1-22.
  • Irmen, A., B.U. Wigger (2002) “Trade Union Objectives and Economic Growth”, FinanzArchiv, 59(1), 49-67.
  • Judge, G.G. (1985) The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
  • Kao, C. (1999) “Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data”, Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1-44.
  • Kaya, V., Ö. Yılmaz (2006) “Bölgesel Enflasyon Bölgesel Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye İçin Zaman Serisi ve Panel Veri Analizleri”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 21(247), 62-78.
  • Kaynak, M. (2009) Kalkınma İktisadı, (3. Baskı), Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Kerr, C. (1983) The Future of Industrial Societies: Convergence or Continuing Diversity?, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Kim, D.K. (2005) “Unionization, Unemployment and Growth in Korea: A Cointegration Approach”, Atlantic Economic Journal, 33(2), 225-233.
  • Koray, M. (1992) Endüstri İlişkileri, İzmir: Basisen Eğitim ve Kültür Yayınları.
  • Kozak, İ.E. (1992) “İşçi Sendikalarının Tarihi Gelişimi (İngiltere Örneği)”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 37, 63-81.
  • Kutlar, A. (2007) Ekonometriye Giriş, (1. Baskı), Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Lee, C.C. (2005) “Energy Consumption and GDP in Developing Countries: A Cointegrated Panel Analysis”, Energy Economics, 27(3), 415-427.
  • Lingens, J. (2002) “Growth and Employment Effects of Unions in a Simple Endogenous Growth Model”, University of Kassel Working Paper, 1-25.
  • Mehta, A. (1957) “The Mediating Role of the Trade Union in Underdeveloped Countries”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 6(1), 16-23.
  • Muir, J. D., J.L. Brown (1974) “Trade Union Power and the Process of Economic Development: The Kenyan Example”, Industrial Relations, 29(3), 474-496.
  • Ng, I., J. McCallum (1989) “Trade Unions, Economic Growth and Politics”, The Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(3), 372-384.
  • Oswald, A.J. (1982) “Trade Unions, Wages and Unemployment: What Can Simple Models Tell Us”, Oxford Economic Papers, 34(3), 526-545.
  • Palokangas, T. (1996) “Endogenous Growth and Collective Bargaining”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 20(5), 925-944.
  • Pantuosco, L.J., D. Parker, G. Stone (2001) “The Effect of Unions on Labor Markets and Economic Growth: An Analysis of State Data”, Journal of Labor Research, 22(1), 195-205.
  • Pantuosco, L. J. and W. Seyfried (2008) “The Effect of Public and Private Unions on State Economic Activity: Evaluating the Benefits to Organized Workers, Policy Makers and Companies”, Journal of Business&Economics Research, 6(2), 27-40.
  • Parreno, J.M.R., F. Sanchez-Losada (2002) “The Role of Unions in an Endogenous Growth Model With Human Capital”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 24(2), 171-192.
  • Pazarlıoğlu, M.V., Ö.K. Gürler (2007) “Telekomünikasyon Yatırımları ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Panel Veri Yaklaşımı”, Finans Politik&Ekonomik Yorumlar, 44(508), 35-43.
  • Pedroni, P. (1999) “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1), 653-670.
  • Pencavel, J. (1999) “The Role of Labor Unions in Fostering Economic Development”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1469, 1-27.
  • Şenkal, A. (1999) Sendikasız Endüstri İlişkileri: Genel Olarak Dünyada ve Türkiye’de, Ankara: Kamu-İş Yayınları.
  • Vedder, R., L. Gallaway (2002) “The Economic Effects of Labor Unions Revisited”, Journal of Labor Research, 23(1), 105-130.
  • Wooldridge, J.M. (2009) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, (4th ed.), Ohio: Cengage Learning.
  • Yılmaz, E. (2010) “Türkiye’de İşçi Sendikalarının Siyasal ve Sosyolojik Özellikleri Üzerinden Tarihsel Süreç İçinde Değerlendirilmesi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 195-207.
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Merter Akıncı

Gönül Yüce Akıncı

Ömer Yılmaz

Publication Date June 30, 2014
Submission Date January 7, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 32 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Akıncı, M., Yüce Akıncı, G., & Yılmaz, Ö. (2014). SENDİKAL HAREKETLERİN İKİ YÜZÜ: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ANALİZİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.17065/huiibf.96868
AMA Akıncı M, Yüce Akıncı G, Yılmaz Ö. SENDİKAL HAREKETLERİN İKİ YÜZÜ: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ANALİZİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. June 2014;32(1):1-27. doi:10.17065/huiibf.96868
Chicago Akıncı, Merter, Gönül Yüce Akıncı, and Ömer Yılmaz. “SENDİKAL HAREKETLERİN İKİ YÜZÜ: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ANALİZİ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 32, no. 1 (June 2014): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.17065/huiibf.96868.
EndNote Akıncı M, Yüce Akıncı G, Yılmaz Ö (June 1, 2014) SENDİKAL HAREKETLERİN İKİ YÜZÜ: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ANALİZİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 32 1 1–27.
IEEE M. Akıncı, G. Yüce Akıncı, and Ö. Yılmaz, “SENDİKAL HAREKETLERİN İKİ YÜZÜ: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ANALİZİ”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2014, doi: 10.17065/huiibf.96868.
ISNAD Akıncı, Merter et al. “SENDİKAL HAREKETLERİN İKİ YÜZÜ: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ANALİZİ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 32/1 (June 2014), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.17065/huiibf.96868.
JAMA Akıncı M, Yüce Akıncı G, Yılmaz Ö. SENDİKAL HAREKETLERİN İKİ YÜZÜ: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ANALİZİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014;32:1–27.
MLA Akıncı, Merter et al. “SENDİKAL HAREKETLERİN İKİ YÜZÜ: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ANALİZİ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 32, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1-27, doi:10.17065/huiibf.96868.
Vancouver Akıncı M, Yüce Akıncı G, Yılmaz Ö. SENDİKAL HAREKETLERİN İKİ YÜZÜ: OECD ÜLKELERİNDE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN ANALİZİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014;32(1):1-27.

Cited By

Kamu Çevre Koruma Harcamalarının Atık Emisyonuna Etkileri: Büyükşehir Statüsündeki Mahalli İdareler Temelinde Bir İnceleme
Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Arastirmalari Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1516730

Manuscripts must conform to the requirements indicated on the last page of the Journal - Guide for Authors- and in the web page.


Privacy Statement

Names and e-mail addresses in this Journal Web page will only be used for the specified purposes of the Journal; they will not be opened for any other purpose or use by any other person.