KORUMA SORUMLULUĞU VE ULUSLARARASI SORUMLULUK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 223 - 248, 07.08.2024

İrem Serra Karayel

Öz

Uluslararası hukuk nezdinde, ‘‘barışa yönelik tehdit’’ kavramı uzun bir süre devletlerarası çatışmalar ile sınırlı olarak tanımlandı. Bir devletin egemenlik sınırları içerisinde gerçekleşen bir iç çatışma veya kitlesel vahşet suçları, devletlerin kendi iç meselesi olarak kabul ediliyordu. Bugün, birbirine çok yakın tarihlerde ortaya çıkan ‘‘koruma sorumluluğu’’ ve uluslararası sorumluluğa özgü ‘‘jus cogens kurallardan kaynaklanan yükümlülüklerin ihlâllerine mahsus neticeler’’, klasik egemenlik anlayışın ötesinde, iç çatışmaların ve kitlesel vahşet suçlarının, uluslararası toplumun bütününü etkilediğini ortaya koydu.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Koruma Sorumluluğu, Kitlesel Vahşet Suçları, Uluslararası Sorumluluk, Jus Cogens kurallardan kaynaklanan yükümlülüklerin ağır ihlâli, Jus Cogens, Erga Omnes

Kaynakça

• 70th General Assembly of the United Nations Political statement on the suspension of the veto in case of mass atrocities Presented by France and Mexico Open to signature to the members of the United Nations; https://onu.delegfrance.org/IMG/pdf/2015_08_07_veto_political_ declaration_en.pdf (e.t 05.09.2023)
• Ago, R. (1976). Fifth report on State responsibility- the internationally wrongful act of the State, source of international responsibility (continued). (UN Doc. A/CN.4/291 and Add.1 & 2 and Corr.1). Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 1976, vol. II (1).
• Alland, D. (05.12.2002). Countermeasures of General Interest. European Journal of International Law. 13: 1221–1239.
• Annan, K. (2000). We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century. Secretary-General of the United Nations. https:// press.un.org/en/2000/20000403.ga9704.doc.html (e.t. 29.03.2024)
• Azarova, V. ( 2018). The Secret Life Of Non-Recognition: EU-Israel Relations And The Obligation Of Non-Recognition İn İnternational Law. Global Affairs, 4(1): 23-37.
• Barboza, J. (1999). International Criminal Law. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. 278: 9-199.
• Batur Yamaner, M., Öktem, E., Kurtdarcan, B., Uzun, C. (2009). 12 Ağustos 1949 Tarihli Cenevre Sözleşmeleri ve Ek Protokolleri. Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları: 42. https://dspace.ceid.org.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/94/ ekutuphane4.1.6.6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Erişim tarihi: 25.04.2024)
• Bellamy, A. J. (2013). The Responsibility to Protect: Towards a Living Reality. United Nations Association-UK.
• Deng, F. M., Kimaro, S., Lyons, T., Rothchild, D., Zartman, I. W. (1996). Sovereignty as Responsibility Conflict Management in Africa. Washington: The Brookings Institution.
• Erkiner, H. H. (2010). Devletin Haksız Fiilden Kaynaklanan Uluslararası Sorumluluğu. On iki Levha Yayıncılık.
• Evans, G. (2008). The Responsibility To Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All. Washington D.C: The Brookings İnstitution.
• International Commision on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). (2001). Report of the Responsibility to Protect. https://www. globalr2p.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/2001-ICISS-Report.pdf. (Erişim tarihi:29.03.2024)
• International Court of Justice (ICJ). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Preliminary Objections. Judgment. I.C.J. Reports 1996.
• International Court of Justice (ICJ). East Timor (Portugal v. Australia). Judgment, I. C.J. Reports 1995.
• International Court of Justice. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited. Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1970.
• International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (07.05.1997). Case no: IT-94-1-T. Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic aka “Dule” (Opinion and Judgment).
• International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (13.11.2001). Case no: IT-95-8. Prosecutor v. Sikirica et al (Sentencing Judgement).
• International Law Comission (ILC). (1996). Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its forty-eighth session, 6 May- 26 July 1996, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-first session, Supplement No.10. (Un Doc.: A/51/10), Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission: 1996, vol. II/2.
• International Law Comission. (2022). Draft Conclusions On İdentification And Legal Consequences Of Peremptory Norms Of General İnternational Law (Jus Cogens) With Commentaries. Yearbook of the International Law Comission vol. II, Part Two. (UN Doc. A/77/10).
• Karayel, İ. S. (2023). Koruma Sorumluluğu ve Jus Cogens Kurallardan Kaynaklanan Yükümlülüklerin Ağır İhlâli Arasındaki İlişki, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• League of Nations Assembly, (1932), Official Journal Special Supplement No. 101, sy.87.
• Legal Consequences cf the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, I. C.J. Reports 2004.
• Legal Consequencesfor States of the Contitiued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Adrisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1971.
• Luck, E. C. (2008). The United Nations and the RTP. The Stanley Foundation Policy Anaysis Brief.
• Pirim, C. Z. (2013). Uluslararası Sorumluluk Hukukunda Devletlerin Ağırlaştırılmış Sorumluluğu: Kuramsal Bir Değerlendirme. Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, 32(2): 147- 182.
• Reçber, S. (2016). İnsancıl Müdahale ve Koruma Sorumluluğu, İstanbul: On iki Levha Yayıncılık,
• Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. (17.07.1989). A/ CONF.183/9.
• UN Security Council Meetings Coverage and Press Releases 15518 of 8 December 2023. (UN Doc.:SC/155189). https://press.un.org/en/2023/ sc15519.doc.htm (Erişim tarihi: 25.04.2024)
• UN Security Council Resolution 10403 of 4 October 2011. (UN Doc: SC/10403).
• UN Security Council Resolution 2011/612 of 4 October 2011. (UN Doc.: S/2011/612).
• UN Security Council Resolution 2023/962 of 6 December 2023. (UN Doc.: S/2023/962).
• United Nation General Assembly, 1970, UN Doc. : A/RES/2625(XXV), first principle ; , ‘‘Güç̧ tehdidi ya da güç̧ kullanılması sonucunda sağlanan hiçbir toprak kazanımı yasal olarak kabul edilmeyecektir’’ https://inhak.adalet.gov.tr/Resimler/Dokuman/2312020094506bm_17. pdf (e.t. 13.04.2023).
• United Nation General Assembly. (14.07.2010). The Secretary- General’s report Early Warning, Assessment, and the Responsibility to Protect. (UN Doc.: A/RES/64/864).
• United Nation, (2018), ‘‘Joint study of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence and the Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide on the contribution of transitional justice to the prevention of gross violations and abuses of human rights and serious violations of international humanitarian law, particularly to the prevention of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, and their recurrence’ (Un. Doc.: A/HRC/37/65).
• United Nations Genel Assembly Resolution 621 of 14 December 2015. (UN Doc. A/70/621).
• United Nations General Assembly Resolution 799(VIII) of 7 December 1953. (Un Doc: A/RES/799(VIII)).
• United Nations General Assembly- Security Council. (10.06.2019). The Secretary-General’s report: Responsibility to Protect: lessons learned for Prevention. (Un. Doc.: A/73/898–S/2019/463).
• United Nations General Assembly, (07.09.2000), Meetings Coverage and Press Releases: GA/9754. https://press.un.org/en/2000/20000907. ga9754.doc.html (Erişim Tarihi: 26.04.2024)
• United Nations General Assembly. (09.12.1948). Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Convention on the Non- Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity, (Soykırım Suçunun Önlenmesi ve Cezalandırılması Sözleşmesi), (UN Doc.: A/RES/3/260). Türkçe metni için bknz; https:// inhak.adalet.gov.tr/Resimler/Dokuman/2312020093827bm_11.pdf (erişim tarihi:25.04.2024)
• United Nations General Assembly. (12.01.2009). Report of the Secretary-General, Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. (UN Doc.: A/63/677).
• United Nations General Assembly. (12.01.2009). The Responsibility To Protect. (UN Doc.: A/RES/63/308).
• United Nations General Assembly. (21/03/2005). Report of the Secretary General Report: In Larger Freedom: Towards Devolopment Security and Human Rights For All. (UN Doc. A/RES/59/2005).
• United Nations Security Council. (17.03.2011). Adopted by the Security Council at its 6498th meeting: on establishment of a ban on flights in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya airspace. (UN Doc.: S/RES/1973).
• United Nations Security Council. (26/02/2011). Adopted by the Security Council at its 6491st meeting: on establishment of a Security Council Committee to monitor implementation of the arms embargo against the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. (UN. Doc.: S/RES/1970).
• United Nations Security Council. (28/04/2006). Adopted by the Security Council at its 5430th meeting: on protection of civilians in armed conflict. (UN Doc.: S/RES/1674)
• Viyana Antlaşmalar Hukuku Sözleşmesi, 1969, Orijinal metin: https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/docs/A_CONF.39_11_Add.2-E.pdf (27.04.2024).