Girne Antik Limanına Bakış: Tarihi Kıyı Bağlamında Peyzajın Kentsel Kıyı Gelişim Prensipleri ile Analizi

Abstract

Bu makale, kentsel sahil geliştirme ilkelerini kullanarak Girne Antik Limanı'nı ve kıyı peyzajını kapsamlı bir şekilde analiz etmektedir. Çalışma, kentsel peyzajın iyileştirilmesi ve dayanıklılığın sağlanması için gerekli bilgiler sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma yaklaşımı, Girne Antik Limanı'nın mevcut durumunu değerlendirmek ve gelişim fırsatlarını belirlemek için saha araştırmaları, arşiv veri analizi ve kentsel tasarım ilkelerini içermektedir. Çalışma, çevresel ve sosyal hususları vurgulayarak kamusal erişimi, bağlantıyı, yeşil alanları, kentsel mobilyaları ve su ile toprak bağlantılarını araştırıyor. Bulgular, limanın tarihi ve kültürel önemini de belirterek geliştirilme potansiyellerini vurgulamaktadır. Kentsel kıyı geliştirme ilkeleri, bölge sakinleri ve ziyaretçiler için canlı, kapsayıcı ve dayanıklı bir kentsel ortam yaratabilir. Başarılı bir gelişim için tarihi bağlamı çağdaş tasarım öğeleriyle dengelemek çok önemlidir. Girne Antik Limanı üzerinden yapılan bu çalışma ile birlikte benzer zorluklarla karşı karşıya olan kıyı bölgelerine de fayda sağlayacak veriye ulaşılabilmektedir. Bu araştırma, kapsamlı kalkınmayı hedefleyen şehir planlamacıları, mimarlar, politika yapıcılar ve kültürel mirası koruma ile ilgili ilgili uzmanlar için bir kaynak sağlamaktadır. Sonuç olarak bu makale, Girne Antik Limanı'nın kültürel bir değer olarak önemini vurgulamakta, ayrıca kıyı peyzajını kentsel kıyı gelişim ilkeleri yoluyla analiz etmek için bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Hem miras değerini koruyan hem de kapsamlı gelişim stratejileri benimseyen limanların benzersiz karakterini korumasının yanında sürekli gelişebilen bir kentsel alana dönüşebileceği anlaşılmaktadır.

Keywords

• Girne Antik Limanı
• kıyı peyzajı
• kentsel kıyı gelişimi
• kültürel miras
• kentsel tasarım

Insights into Girne Ancient Harbor: Analyzing the Landscaping in Historical Coastal Context with Urban Waterfront Development Principles

Abstract

This article thoroughly analyzes the Girne Ancient Harbor and its coastal landscape, employing urban waterfront development principles. The study aims to provide valuable insights for enhancing the urban landscape and ensuring resilience. The research approach incorporates field surveys, archival data analysis, and urban design principles to assess the current state of Girne Ancient Harbor and identify development opportunities. The study explores public access, connectivity, green spaces, urban furniture, and water and land connections by emphasizing environmental and social considerations. The findings highlight the harbor's potential for improvement by capitalizing on its historical and cultural significance. Urban waterfront development principles can create a vibrant, inclusive, and resilient urban environment for residents and visitors. Balancing historical context with contemporary design elements is crucial for successful development. The implications extend beyond Girne Ancient Harbor, benefiting coastal areas facing similar challenges. This research provides a valuable resource for urban planners, architects, policymakers, and heritage conservationists involved in comprehensive development. Ultimately, this article emphasizes the importance of Girne Ancient Harbor as a cultural asset and presents a framework for analyzing the coastal landscape through urban waterfront development principles. By embracing comprehensive strategies and preserving heritage value, the harbor can transform into a thriving urban space while maintaining its unique character.

Keywords

• Kyrenia Ancient Harbor
• coastal landscape
• urban waterfront development
• cultural heritage
• urban design

References

1. Altan Bayraktar, Ü. (2015). Fractions in urban and collective memory and transformation of public space: The harbor example in the Kyrenia town. Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, 11(44), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.14783/od.v11i44.5000080016
2. Armenio, E., & Mossa, M. (2020). On the need for an integrated large-scale methodology of coastal management: A methodological proposal. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(6), 385.
3. Arslan, A. A. (2014). A study into the effects of art education on children at the. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4114 – 4118.
4. Avni, N., & Fischler, R. (2019). Social and environmental justice in waterfront redevelopment: the Anacostia River, Washington, D.C. Urban Affairs Review, 56(6), 1779-1810.
5. Borggren, J., & Ström, P. (2014). On the waterfront: Studying the development of residences and workplaces at Norra Älvstranden, Gothenburg, Sweden. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 29(4-5), 429-452.
6. Bunce, S. (2009). Developing sustainability: sustainability policy and gentrification on Toronto's waterfront. Local Environment, 651-667.
7. Cerisola, S., & Panzera, E. (2022). Cultural cities, urban economic growth, and regional development: The role of creativity and cosmopolitan identity. Regional Science Association International, 101(2), 285-302.
8. Chen, Y. (2022). Financialising urban redevelopment: Transforming Shanghai’s waterfront. Land Use Policy, 112, 105126.

9. Cialdea, D., & Pompei, C. (2022). The waterfront development in Europe: Between planning and urban design sustainability. In C. Piselli, H. Altan, O. Balaban, & P. Kremer, Innovating Strategies and Solutions for Urban Performance and Regeneration. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation (pp. 49–60). Cham: Springer.
10. Coscia, C., Lazzari, G., & Rubino, I. (2018). Values, memory, and the role of exploratory methods for policy-design processes and the sustainable redevelopment of waterfront contexts: The case of officine Piaggio (Italy). Sustainability, 10(9), 2989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092989
11. Djukić, A., Marić, J., Antonić, B., Kovač, V., Joković, J., & Dinkić, N. (2020). The evaluation of urban renewal waterfront development: The case of the Sava Riverfront in Belgrade, Serbia. Sustainability, 12(16), 6620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166620
12. Eldardiry, D. H. (2022). The restoration of the cities’ water waterfront after the COVID-19 pandemic, Case of Al Khobar city, Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 14(22), 14775.
13. Feng, L., & Ma, X. (2018). Study on plan of rural waterfront greenway in Beijing based on valley economy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 108, 042121. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/108/4/042121
14. Fernandes, A., de Sousa, J. F., & Salvador, R. (2017). The cultural heritage in the postindustrial waterfront: A case study of the South Bank of the Tagus Estuary, Portugal. Space and Culture, 21(2), 170-191.
15. Fouad, S. S., & Sharaf Eldin, S. (2023). Public perception influence on the reshaping urban heritage: A case study of port said historic quarters. Space and Culture, 26(4), 579-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312211018397
16. Girard, L. F., Kourtit, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2014). Waterfront areas as hotspots of sustainable and creative development of cities. Sustainability, 6(7), 4580-4586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074580
17. Greenlaw, M. E., Gromack, A. G., Basquill, S. P., MacKinnon, D. S., Lynds, J. A., Taylor, R. B., . . . Henry, R. (2012). A physiographic coastline classification of the Scotian Shelf bioregion and environs: the Nova Scotia coastline and the New Brunswick Fundy Shore. Canada: Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat.
18. Guvenbas, G., & Polay, M. (2020). Post-occupancy evaluation: A diagnostic tool to establish and sustain inclusive access in Kyrenia Town Centre. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(10), 1620-1642.
19. Hall, P. V., & Stern, P. R. (2014). Implicating waterfronts in regional sustainability. Local Environment, 19(6), 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.832182
20. Hassan, A. M., & Lee, H. (2015). Toward the sustainable development of urban areas: An overview of global trends in trials and policies. Land Use Policy, 48, 199-212.
21. Hoyle, B. (1999). Scale and sustainability: The role of community groups in Canadian port-city waterfront change. Journal of Transport Geography, 7, 65-78.
22. Iwata, N., & Rio, V. d. (2004). The image of the waterfront in Rio de Janeiro: urbanism and social representation of reality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(2), 171-183.
23. Jun, J. (2023). Towards sustainable urban riverfront redevelopment: Adaptability as a design strategy for the Hangang riverfront in Seoul. Sustainability, 15(12), 9207.
24. Kathijotes, N. (2013). Keynote: blue economy - environmental and behavioural aspects towards sustainable coastal development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 7-13.
25. Latip, N. S., Shamsudin, S., & Liew, M. S. (2012). Functional dimension at ‘Kuala Lumpur Waterfront’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49, 147–155.
26. Le, T. D. (2020). Climate change adaptation in coastal cities of developing countries: characterizing types of vulnerability and adaptation options. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 25, 739–761.
27. Liu, Y., Jin, X., & Dupre, K. (2022). Engaging stakeholders in contested urban heritage planning and management. Cities, 122.
28. Long, H., & Cui, K. (2020). Coastal landscape architecture design based on nonlinear thinking. Journal of Coastal Research, 107(SI), 218-221.
29. Miloš, M., & Dragana, V. (2021). Mythology as a driver of creative economy in waterfront regeneration: The case of Savamala in Belgrade, Serbia. Space and Culture.
30. Morozov, A., Shmeleva, I. A., Zakharenko, N., Budenny, S., & Mityagin, S. (2023). Assessment of spatial inequality through the accessibility of urban services. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023. 13957, pp. 270–286. Cham: Springer.
31. Oktay, D., & Bala, H. A. (2015). A holistic research approach to measuring urban identity: findings from Girne (Kyrenia) area study. ArchNet-IJAR : International Journal of Architectural Research, 201-215.
32. Olsen, S. (2003). Frameworks and indicators for assessing progress in integrated coastal management initiatives. Ocean Coast Management, 46(3-4), 347-361.
33. Othman, A., Al-Hagla, K., & Hasan, A. E. (2021). The impact of attributes of waterfront accessibility on human well-being: Alexandria Governorate as a case study. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(1), 1033-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.018
34. Papatheochari, T., & Coccossis, H. (2019). Development of a waterfront regeneration tool to support local decision making in the context of integrated coastal zone management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 169, 284-295.
35. Pirlone, F., Spadaro, I., De Nicola, M., & Sabattini, M. (2022). Sustainable urban regeneration in port-cities. A participatory project for the Genoa waterfront. TeMA Journal of Land Use Mobility and Environment, 1, 89-110.
36. Ragheb, G. A., & Ragheb, A. (2021). A multi-criteria decision for touristic revitalization of historic waterfront based on AHP analysis: A case study of Ezbet El-Borg City, Damietta, Egypt . International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(8), 1437-1448. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160804
37. Ruskeepaa, L. A. (2011). Adaptation and adaptability : expectant design for resilience in coastal urbanity. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved March 17, 2024, from http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65551
38. Sealey, K. S., Andiroglu, E., Lamere, J., Sobczak, J., & Suraneni, P. (2021). Multifunctional performance of coastal structures based on South Florida Coastal environs. Journal of Coastal Research, 37(3), 656-669.
39. Shah, S., & Roy, A. K. (2017). Social sustainability of urban waterfront- the case of Carter Road Waterfront in Mumbai, India. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 37, 195-204.
40. Siewwuttanagul, S., Techapeeraparnich, W., Wongchavalidkul, N., & Siridhara, S. (2022). Collaboration on urban regeneration: Perspectives towards transit-oriented development between local entrepreneurs and key stakeholders in Salaya sub-district, Thailand. Journal of Population and Social Studies (JPSS), 31, 95-110.
41. Sorensen, J. (1993). The international proliferation of integrated coastal zone management efforts. Ocean & Coastal Management, 21(1-3), 45-80.
42. Üzümcüoğlu, D. (2023). Navigating change: a framework for crafting adaptable waterfront designs in urban environments. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 19-35.
43. Üzümcüoğlu, D., & Polay, M. (2022 (a)). The assessment of creative waterfronts: a case study of the Kyrenia waterfront. Sustainability, 14(19), 11906.
44. Üzümcüoğlu, D., & Polay, M. (2022 (b)). The role of the creative environment concept in waterfront development: The case of Limassol Promenade (Molos). Journal of Urban Research and Development, 3(1), 16-29.
45. Üzümcüoğlu, D., & Polay, M. (2022). Urban waterfront development, through the lens of the Kyrenia waterfront case study. Sustainability, 14(15). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159469
46. Vallega, A. (2001). Urban waterfront facing integrated coastal management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 44, 379-410.
47. Wang, J., Li, Y., Wang, Q., & Cheong, K. C. (2019). Urban–rural construction land replacement for more sustainable land use and regional development in China: Policies and practices. Land, 8(11), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8110171
48. Wang, Y., Dewancker, B. J., & Qi, Q. (2020). Citizens’ preferences and attitudes towards urban waterfront spaces: a case study of Qiantang riverside development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(36), 45787-45801.
49. Workineh, N. A. (2021). Rezoning prior urban planning period for urban space development in Injibara Town, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. Land Use Policy, 109.
50. Xie, C. (2023). The symbiotic development of urban waterfront spaces and regional culture: Unleashing Potentials, innovative design, and sustainable development. Journal of Innovation and Development, 3(2), 26–30.
51. Zaki, S. K., & Hegazy, I. R. (2023). Investigating the challenges and opportunities for sustainable waterfront development in Jeddah City. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 18, 809–819. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctad062
52. Zhao, P. (2020). Study on the representation of traditional graphic elements in coastal landscape planning and design. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(SI), 253-255.