Kültür Endüstrileri Kentsel Politikalarda Bir Yer Edinebilir mi?: İstanbul Film Endüstrisi Örneği

Abstract

Kentsel politikalarla desteklenen kültür endüstrilerinin, kentlerde ekonomik, mekansal ve kültürel alanlarda, doğrudan ve dolaylı pek çok fayda açığa çıkardığına ilişkin pek çok kanıt bulunmaktadır. Bu yazıda İstanbul’un özgün yapısı içerisinde oluşan ve kümelenen bir kültür endüstrisi olan film endüstrisine yer verilerek, organizasyonel ve mekansal yapı çözümlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Sektörün iç dinamiklerini anlamaya yönelik bu çözümlemede, günümüz kesitinde film endüstrisinin sorun, potansiyel ve beklentilerine yönelik olarak üretilebilecek yerel ve merkezi politikalar, 2005-2013 yılları arasında yürütülen araştırmanın temel bulgularından hareketle sıralanmıştır.

Keywords

• kentsel politikalar,kültür endüstrileri,film endüstrisi,İstanbul

Any Room for Cultural Industries in Urban Policies?: The case of Istanbul Film Industry

Abstract

There is great evidence that cultural industries, supported by urban policies, reveal great economical, spatial and cultural impacts in cities. This paper deconstructs film industry by its organizational and spatial structure, which stems from the unique structure of Istanbul and prone to cluster. Besides internal policies, the contribution of the central and local policies that might produce solutions for the major problems, potentials and projections of the film industry is discussed, regarding the data collected in a broad research conducted in between 2005-2013.

Keywords

• urban policies,cultural industries,film industry,Istanbul

References

1. AFC (1999). Report on the Film and Television Production Industry Canberra: Australian Film Finance Corporation Limited, http://www.afc.gov.au/ downloads/policies/ftpirep.pdf, [erişim 5 Aralık 2007].
2. Altıoklar, M. (2010). Sinema stratejik bir sektördür, http://www.filmyon.org/ modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=152, [erişim tarihi 27 Ocak 2010].
3. Beeton, S. (2005). Aspects of Tourism: 25- Film Induced Tourism, Great Britain: Channel View Publications.
4. Belussi, F. (2004). In Search of a Useful Theory of Spatial Clustering, Paper read at DRUID Summer Conference 2004 on Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development June 14-16 2004, Elsinore, Denmark, http://www.druid.dk/ uploads/txpicturedb/ds2004-1344.pdf, [erişim Ekim 2008].
5. Bianchini, F., Dawson, J. ve Evans, R. (1992). Flagship projects in urban regeneration, P. Healey, S. Davsudi, M. O’ Toole, S. Tavşanoglu ve D. Usher (der.) Rebuilding the City: property-led urban regeneration (ss. 245-255) içinde, London: E. and F. N. Spon.
6. Bianchini, F. ve Parkinson, M. (der.) (1993). Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration. Manchester: Manchester Univerity Press.
7. BOP Consulting (2010). Mapping the Creative industries: a toolkit, Creative and Cultural Economy series⁄ 2, British Council Creative Economy Unit, http://www.britishcouncil.org/mapping_the_creative_industries_a_toolkit_2-2.pdf, [erişim 9 Mart 2011].
8. Boxofficeturkiye (2014). Boxoffice web sitesi veri tabanı, www.boxofficeturkiye.com, [erişim 10 Ocak 2014].

9. Camauër, L. (2002). Cultural Work and Cultural Production, an Attempt to Survey a Seemingly Unending Field, National Institute for Working Life.
10. CCI (2005). Centre for Creative Industry, http://www.creative.qub.ac.uk/ creative.html, [erişim 9 Nisan 2006].
11. CE (2013). Cultural Policy in Turkey- National Report, Council of Europe, European Programme of National Cultural Policy Reviews, October 2013, http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/reviews/Turkey_en.asp, [erişim 14 Ocak 2014], Ankara.
12. CFC (2006). Attracting Film Production, http://www.film.ca.gov/pdf/AttractingFilm Production-text-09-08.pdf, [erişim 16 Şubat 2007].
13. Coe, N. ve Johns, J. (2004). Beyond production clusters, towards a critical political economy of Networks in the film and television industries, D. Power ve A.J. Scott (der.) Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture (ss. 188-204) içinde. London and New York: Routledge.
14. Coe, N.M. (2001). A Hybrid Agglomeration? The Development of a Satellite-Marshallian Industrial District in Vancouver’s Film Industry, Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 10, 1753–1775.
15. Coish, D. (2001). Trends and Conditions in Census Metropolitan Areas Census Metropolitan Areas as Culture Clusters, Statistics Canada.
16. Creative Clusters (2008). Creative Clusters web sitesi, www.creativeclusters.com.
17. Croy, W.G. (2004). The Lord of the Rings, New Zealand, And Tourism: Image Building With Film, Working Paper 10/04, March 2004, Monash University, Business and Economics, http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/mgt/research/ working-papers/2004/wp10-04.pdf, [erişim 1 Eylül 2008].
18. Cunningham, S. (2002). From Cultural to Creative Industries: Theory, Industry, and Policy Implications, http://eprints.qut.edu.au/588/1/cunningham_from.pdf, [erişim 4 Ağustos 2005].
19. CURDS (2001). Culture Cluster Mapping and Analysis, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies. http://www.cipi.gob.mx/Biblioteca_Digital_CIPI/ BibliografiaBasica/innovacion/Culture%20Cluster%20Mapping%20and%20Analysis.pdf, [erişim 14 Ağustos 2005].
20. DACST (1998). Cultural Industries Growth Strategy (Cigs) the South African Film and Television Industry Report, Department of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology, http://www.docstoc.com/docs/712286/The-South-African-Film-And-Television-Industry-Report, [erişim 17 Aralık 2007].
21. DCMS (1998). Creative Industries Mapping Document, London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
22. DCMS (2001). Creative Industries Mapping Document 2001, London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
23. DCMS (2004). Culture at the Heart of Regeneration, London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport, http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/consultations/ DCMSCulture.pdf, [erişim 12 Ağustos 2005].
24. DCMS (2008). Creative Britain, New Talents for the New Economy, London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport, http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/ publications/CEPFeb2008.pdf, [erişim 6 Ocak 2008].
25. DCSF (2005). Report on the State of Czech Cinematography, Department of Cinematography and State Funds, http://www.obs.coe.int/oea_publ /eurocine/cz_2005.pdf, [erişim 6 Kasım 2007].
26. De Vany, A. (2004). Hollywood Economics: How Extreme Uncertainty Shapes the Film Industry. London and New York: Routledge.
27. Dicken, P. ve Lloyd, P.E. (1990). Location in Space Theorical Perspectives in Economic Geography, New York: Harper Collins.
28. DiNoto, M., ve Merk, L. (1993). Small Economy Estimates of the Impact of the Arts. Journal of Cultural Economics, 17(2), 41-53.
29. Dondurei, D. ve Venger, N. (2001). "The Film Sector in the Russian Federation" DOUBLE-D LTD, http://www.obs.coe.int/oea_publ/eurocine/doubled_film.pdf, [erişim 11 Kasım 2007].
30. DREAM Ireland (2001). Creative Enterprise, Project Report Series, Report 2: Northern Ireland's Creative Industries: A Qualitative Map, DREAM Ireland.
31. EAO (2013). Cinema admissions in Europe down overall, but some countries make big strides, The European Audiovisual Observatory, Press Release, Strasbourg, 8 February 2013, http://www.obs.coe.int/about/oea/pr/berlinale2013.html, [erişim 9 Şubat 2013].
32. ECONorthwest (2003). The Economic Impacts of Film & Video Productions in Washington State, Portland, Oregon: Washington State Film Office, http://www.seattle.gov/filmoffice/docs/Seattle_FilmStudy2003.pdf, [erişim 3 Mart 2006].
33. EEDA (2002). East of England and Creative Industries: Advice & Analysis, Final Report, EEDA, http://insighteast.org.uk/observatory/reports/creativeindustry/ finalreportv4.pdf, [erişim 7 Mayıs 2006].
34. Eisenberg, C., Gerlach, R. ve Handke, C. (2006). Introduction, the Cultural Industries: The British Experience in International Perspective, http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/conferences/culturalindustries/eisenberg-christiane/PDF/eisenberg.pdf, [erişim 9 Aralık 2007].
35. ESI Corporation (2004). Analysis of the Film and Video Industry in Arizona, Phoenix: Arizona Department of Commerce. http://azmemory.lib.az.us/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=/statepubs&CISOPTR=811&filename=812.pdf, [erişim 18 Aralık 2006].
36. Evans, G. (2005). Measure for Measure: Evaluating the Evidence of Culture’s Contribution to Regeneration, Urban Studies, Vol.42, Nos 5/6, 959-983.
37. Evans, G. ve Shaw, P. (2004). The Contribution of Culture to Regeneration in the UK: A Review of Evidence, a Report to the Department for Culture Media and Sport, London: LondonMet., http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/consultations/ADCMS Final1.pdf, [erişim 9 Şubat 2006].
38. Flew, T. (2002). Beyond ad hocery: Defining Creative Industries, paper presented to Cultural Sites, Cultural Theory, Cultural Policy, The Second International Conference on Cultural Policy Research, Te Papa, Wellington, New Zealand, 23-26 January 2002, http://www.library.auckland.ac.nz/subjects/bus/ExecProg/ docs/crea tiveindustries.pdf.
39. Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it is Transforming Work,Leisure, Communiuty and Everyday Life, NewYork: Basic Books.
40. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the Creative Class. New York: Routledge.
41. Freeman, G., Kyser, J., Sidhu, N., Huang, G. ve Montoya, M. (2005). What Is the Cost of Runaway Production? Jobs, Wages, Economic Output and State Tax Revenue at Risk Whan Motion Picture Productions Leave California, CA Film Commission Study, Los Angeles Country Economic Development Cooperation, http://www.film.ca.gov/pdf/press_release/California_Film_Commission_Study.pdf, [erişim 5 Aralık 2006].
42. Galloway, S. ve Dunlop, S. (2006). Deconstructing the Concept of ‘Creative Industries, Christiane Eisenberg, Rita Gerlach ve Christian Handke (der.). Cultural Industries: The British Experience in International Perspective (ss.33-52) içinde, Online. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de, Humboldt University Berlin, Edoc-Server.
43. Garcia, B. (2004). Cultural Policy and urban regeneration in western european cities, Local Economy, Vol.19, No.4, 312-326
44. Gibson, C. (2003). Cultures at work: why ‘culture’ matters in research on the ‘cultural’ industries, Social & Cultural Geography, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 201-215.
45. Gibson, C. ve Kong, L. (2005). Cultural economy: a critical review, Progress in Human Geography 29, 5, 541–561.
46. Goldsmith, B. ve O'Regan, T. (2004). Locomotives and Stargates, Inner-city studio complexes in Sydney, Melbourne and Toronto, International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 10, No. 1, 29-45.
47. Gornostaeva, G. (2006 a). Face-to-Face Interactions Along the Production Chain and across Networks, International Journal of Knowledge, Culture & Change Management, 6, http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/, [erişim 21 Mart 2007].
48. Gornostaeva, G. (2006 b). Tacit Knowledge Exchange Along the Production Chain and across Networks: A Study of the Film and Television Industry in London, International Journal of Knowledge, Culture & Change Management.
49. Gornostaeva, G. ve Pratt, A.C. (2006). Digitisation and face-to-face interactions: the example of the film industry in London. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 1 (3). pp. 101-108.
50. Hall, T. (1998). Urban Geography, New York: Routledge.
51. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The Cultural Industries. London: Sage.
52. Hesmondhalgh, D. ve Pratt, A.C. (2005). Cultural industries and cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11 (1). pp. 1-14.
53. Higgs, P. ve Cunningham, S. (2008). Creative Industries Mapping: Where Have We Come from and Where Are We Going?, Creative Industries Journal, 7-30, http://www.atypon-link.com/INT/doi/pdf/10.1386/cij.1.1.7_1, [erişim Aralık 2008].
54. Howkins, J. (2001). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas. London, Penguin.
55. Hudson, S. ve Ritchie, J.R. (2006). Promoting Destinations Via Film Tourism: An Empirical Identification of Supporting Marketing Initiatives, Journal of Travel Research, 05, 387–396, http://www.linkbc.ca/torc/downs1/PromotingFilmTourism JTR.pdf, [erişim Eylül 2008].
56. Isbasoiu, G.M. (2007). Industrial Clusters and Regional Development. The Case of Timisoara, and Montebelluna, Paper read at ERIK Network Conference 10-11 2007, at Brussels, http://www.eriknetwork.net/workshop/bruxcluster/Geor geIsbasoiu.pdf, [erişim Şubat 2008].
57. Iwashita, C. (2006). Media representation of the UK as a destination for Japanese tourists: Popular culture and tourism. Tourist Studies, 6(1), 59-77.
58. İMP (2006). 1/100.000 ölçekli İstanbul Çevre Düzeni Planı- Plan Raporu, İstanbul Metropolitan Planlama ve Kentsel Tasarım Merkezi, İstanbul.
59. İTO (2010). İstanbul Ticaret Odası 2010 yılı itibariyle üye firmalar.
60. Jansson, J. ve Power, D. (der.) (2006). Image of the City. Urban Branding as Constructed Capabilities in Nordic City Regions, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University.
61. Jones, P. ve Evans, J. (2008). Urban Regeneration in the UK. London: Sage
62. KEA (2006). The Economy of Culture in Europe, Avrupa Komisyonu için hazırlanan çalışma.
63. Kratke, S. (2002). Network Analysis of Production Clusters: The Potsdam/Babelsberg Film Industry as an Example, European Planning Studies, Vol. 10, No.1, 27-54.
64. Kunzmann, K.R. (2004). Culture, creativity and spatial planning, TPR, 75(3), pp. 337-358.
65. LAEDC (2005). Film Industry Profile of California/Los Angeles County, http://www.laedc.org/reports/Film-2005.pdf, [erişim 6 Aralık 2007].
66. Lambooy, J. G. (1998). Economies of Agglomeration and Spatial Development: Cities in the Era of the Knowledge Economy, Inaugural lecture, University of Utrecht http://econ.geo.uu.nl/lambooy/Economies%20of%20agglomeration%20incl% 20bibl%201feb07.pdf, [erişim Ekim 2008].
67. Landry, C. (2000). The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan.
68. Landry, C. (2006). The Art of City Making. London: Earthscan.
69. Loftman, P. ve Nevin, B. (1995). Prestige Projects and Urban Regeneration in the 1980’s and 1990’s: A Review of Benefits and Limitations, Planning Practice and Research, 10 (3/4), ss. 299-312.
70. Lorenzen, M. (2008). Creativity at Work: On the Globalization of the Film Industry, http://openarchive.cbs.dk/bitstream/handle/10398/7775/Creative%20 Encounters %20Working%20Papers%208.pdf?sequence=1, [erişim 3 Ocak 2014].
71. Macionis, N. (2004). Understanding the Film-Induced Tourist, Frost, Warwick, Croy, Glen ve Beeton, Sue (der). International Tourism and Media Conference Proceedings içinde. 24th-26th November 2004. Melbourne: Tourism Research Unit, Monash University. 86–97, http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/units/tru /conferences/itam04/macionis.pdfhttp://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/units/tru/conferences/itam04/macionis.pdf, [erişim 22 Eylül 2008].
72. Martin, R. ve Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing Clusters: Chaotic Concept or Policy Panacea?, Journal of Economic Geography 3, 5-35.
73. Maskell, P. ve Lorenzen, M. (2004). The Cluster as Market Organisation, Urban Studies, 991-1009.
74. Montgomery, J. (2004). Cultural Quarters as Mechanisms for Urban Regeneration. Part 2: A Review of Four Cultural Quarters in the UK, Ireland and Australia, Planning Practice & Research, 3-31.
75. O’Connor, J. (1999). The Definition of ‘Cultural Industries’ [online], http://www. pedrobendassolli.com/pesquisa/icc1.pdf.
76. Oxford Economics (2012). The Economic Impact of the UK Film Industry, Supported by the British Film Institute, Pinewood Shepperton plc, British Film, Commission and Creative England, accessed at http://www.creativecoalitionca mpaign.org.uk/images/uploads/bfi-economic-impact-of-the-uk-film-industry-2012-09-17.pdf, 04.01.2013.
77. Özkan, E. (2009). Kentsel Dönüşümde Kültür Endüstrileri: İstanbul'da Film Endüstrisinin Kentsel Dönüşüm Yaratma Potansiyellerinin Belirlenmesi, yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Anabilim Dalı Şehir Planlama Programı, İstanbul.
78. Pacione, M. (2009). Urban Geography A Global Perspective. New York: Routledge.
79. Piore, M. & Sabel, C. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
80. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
81. Potts, J., Cunnigham, S., Hartley, J. ve Ormerod P. (2008). Social Network Markets: A New Definition of the Creative Industries, for submission to Journal of Cultural Economics, 21st may version, http://repp.anu.edu.au/ripp/creativein dustries/Potts-RiskAppreciation_Society.pdf, [erişim 2 Temmuz 2009].
82. Power, D. ve Scott, A.J. (2004). A Prelude to Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture, D. Power ve A.J. Scott (der.) Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture (ss. 3-15) içinde. London and New York: Routledge.
83. Pratt, A.C. (1997). The Cultural Industries Production System: A Case Study of Employment Change in Britain, 1984-91, Environment and Planning, 1953-74, April 1997 Draft, http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/geographyAndEnvironment/whos Who /profiles/pratt/pdf/EmploymentChangeBritain.pdf, [erişim 14 Aralık 2007].
84. Pratt, A.C. (1999). Employment: the difficulties of classification, the logic of grouping industrial activities comprising the sector, and some summaries of the size and distribution of employment in the sector in Great Britain, paper presented at the conference 'The new cultural map: a research agenda for the 21st century', Bretton Hall, Leeds, http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/geographyAndEnviro nment/whos Who/profiles/pratt/pdf/EmploymentChangeBritain.pdf, [erişim 14 Aralık 2007].
85. Pratt, A.C. (2002). The Relationship between the City, ‘Cultural Tourism and the Cultural Industries, Cultural Tourism as an Urban Cultural Industry. Acritical Appraisal, paper read at Cultural Tourism, Interarts, with Turisme de Barcelona, Turisme de Catalunya, Diputació de Barcelona, at Barcelona.
86. Pratt, A.C. (2005). Cultural Industries and Public Policy, International Journal of Cultural Policy 11(1), 31-44.
87. Roberts, P. (2000). The Evolution, Definition and Purpose of Urban Regeneration, P. Roberts ve H. Skyes (der.) Urban Regeneration a Handbook (ss. 9-36) içinde. London: Sage Publications.
88. Roodhouse, S. (2006). The Creative Industries: Definitions, Quantification and Practice, Christiane Eisenberg, Rita Gerlach ve Christian Handke (der.). Cultural Industries: The British Experience in International Perspective (ss.13-32) içinde, Online. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de, Humboldt University Berlin, Edoc-Server.
89. Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
90. Scott, A.J. (1997). The Cultural Economy of Cities, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 21,2, 323-39.
91. Scott, A.J. (2002). A New Map of Hollywood: The Production and Distribution of American Motion Pictures, Regional Studies, Vol. 36.9, pp. 957–975
92. Scott, A.J. (2004). Cultural Products Industries and Urban Economic Development, Urban Affairs Review, 461-490., http://129.3.20.41/eps/urb/papers/ 0511/0511005.pdf, [erişim 25 Ekim 2006].
93. SGK (2008). Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu 2008 Yılı İstatistik Yıllığı.
94. Shorthose, J. (2004). Nottingham’s de facto Cultural Quarter: The Lace Market, Independents and a Convivial Ecology, M. Jayne ve D. Bell (der.) Cities of Quarters: Urban Villages in the Contemporary City (ss. 149-162) içinde. Hants: Ashgate Publications.
95. Sinema Konseyi (2010). Stratejik Rapor Çalışmaları
96. Siwek, S.E. (2002). Copyright Industries in the U.S. Economy- The 2002 Report, International Intellectual Property Alliance. http://www.iipa.com/pdf/2002 SIWEK FULL.pdf, [erişim 6 Aralık 2006].
97. Smith, A. (2012). Events and Urban Regeneration, The Strategic Use of Events to Revitalize Cities. London: Routledge.
98. Stric, V. ve Klasová, S. (2005). Report on the Slovak Audiovisiual Situation in 2004, Bratislava: Ministry of Culture of the Slovak Republic – MEDIA Desk Slovakia, http://www.obs.coe.int/online_publication/reports/sk_av_report_2004.pdf, [erişim 11 Kasım 2007]. Tallon, A. (2010). Urban Regeneration in the UK. New York: Routledge.
99. TLOC (2001). U.S. Film Industry Report, The Library of Congress, report conducted on behalf of the U.S. Department of Commerce, erişim http://www.ita.doc. gov/media/migration11901.pdf, [erişim tarihi 16 Kasım 2011].
100. Töre, E. (2013). Film Endüstrisinin Eşik Bekçileri: Türkiye’de Dağıtım Hollywood Kıskacında Mı?, R. Özgül Kılanç (der.) İletişim Ve...(ss. 114-144) içinde. İstanbul: Es Yayınları.
101. Töre, E.Ö. (2010a). İstanbul Film Endüstrisi, İstanbul’da Kültür Ekonomisine Yön Veren Dinamikler, İstanbul Kültür Mirası ve Kültür Ekonomisi Envanteri 2010, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
102. Töre, E.Ö. (2010b). İstanbul’da Kültür Ekonomisini Döndüren Çarklardan Biri: Film Endüstrisi, Temel Yapısal Özellikler, Fırsat ve Tehditler, Politika Önerileri Sektörel Araştırma Raporu, İstanbul Kültür Mirası ve Kültür Ekonomisi Envanteri 2010, İstanbul, http://www.istanbulkulturenvanteri.gov.tr/ files/yayinlar /ISTANBUL DA_FILM_ENDUSTRISI.pdf.
103. Turok, I. (1992). Property-led urban regeneration: panacea or placebo?, Environment and Planning A, 24, 361-379.
104. Turok, I. (2003). Cities, Clusters and Creative Industries: The Case of Film and Television in Scotland, European Planning Studies, Vol. 11, No. 5, 549-565.
105. TÜİK (2002). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Genel Sanayi ve İşyerleri Sayımı (GESİS) 2002 verileri.
106. TÜİK (2008). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Yıllık Sanayi ve Hizmet İstatistikleri (YSHİ) 2003-2008 verileri.
107. TÜİK (2010). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu web sitesi, http://www.tuik.gov.tr, [erişim tarihi 3 Kasım 2010] ).
108. UNCTAD (2008). The Challenge of Assessing the Creative Economy: toward Informed Policy-making. Creative Economy Report 2008. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
109. UNCTAD (2010). Creative Economy: A Feasible Development Option. Creative Economy Report 2010. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
110. Van Der Berg, L., Braun, E. ve Van Winden, W. (2001). Growth Clusters in Metropolitan Cities, Rotterdam: Ashgate Publishing.
111. Waits, M.J. (2003). Advantages of the Industry Cluster Approach to Economic Development, presentation, http://www.bcrstn.com/downloads/canada2.pdf, [erişim 4 Nisan 2006].
112. Warnick, Rodney B., Bojanic, David C. ve Siriangkul, Artitaya (2005). Movie effects on the Image of Thailand Among College Student Travelers, Proceedings of the 2005 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, 2005 April 10-12; Peden, John G.; Schuster, Rudy M., (der.), NY: Bolton Landing, 355-364.
113. WIPO (2003). Guide on Surveying the Economic Contribution of the Copyright-Based Industries, Geneva. http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/publications/pdf/ copyrightpub 893.pdf, [erişim 27 Aralık 2007].
114. Wiesand, A. ve Söndermann, M. (2005). The 'Creative Sector' – an Engine for Diversity, Growth and Jobs in Europe an Overview of Research Findings and Debates, Prepared for the European Cultural Foundation Brussels: European Cultural Foundation, http://www.kulturforschung.de/dyndata/Creat.pdf, [erişim 3 Nisan 2006].
115. YEKON (2013). Yaratıcı İstanbul Atölyeleri Projesi, Sinema Endüstrisi Odak Grup Toplantısı notları, 23.12.2013, İstanbul. Mevzuat
116. 2464 Nolu Belediye Gelirleri Kanunu (29.05.1981 tarih 17354 sayılı T.C. Resmi Gazete).
117. 3984 Nolu Radyo ve Televizyon Kuruluş ve Yayınları Hakkında Kanun (20.04.1994 tarih 21911 sayılı T.C.Resmi Gazete).
118. 4857 Nolu İş Kanunu (10.06.2003 tarih 25134 sayılı T.C. Resmi Gazete).
119. 5224 Nolu Sinema Filmlerinin Değerlendirilmesi ve Sınıflandırılması ile Desteklenmesi Hakkında Kanun (21.7.2004 tarih 25529 sayılı T.C. Resmi Gazete).
120. 5225 Nolu Kültür Yatırımları ve Girişimlerini Teşvik Kanunu (21.07.2004 tarih 25529 sayılı T.C. Resmi Gazete).
121. 5846 Nolu Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu (13.12.1951 tarih 7981 sayılı T.C. Resmi Gazete).