Abstract
Bu makalenin amacı giderek göç alan bir ülke haline gelen
Türkiye’de devlet aktörleri ve sivil toplum kuruluşları tarafından henüz
tartışılmaya başlanan göçmenlerin entegrasyonu konusunda tarihsel bir
perspektifle Osmanlı’dan günümüze etno-kültürel ve dinsel açıdan farklı olan
göçmenlere devlet aktörleri tarafından nasıl bakıldığına ilişkin bir değerlendirme
yapmaktır. Bunu yaparken de, bir göçmen ulusu olan Amerika Birleşik Devletleri
ile göç alma deneyimleri açısından zengin olan Avrupa örneklerine bakarak uyum
veya entegrasyon konusunun Türkiye’de ele alınması yönündeki tartışmalara ışık
tutulmaya çalışılacaktır. Çalışmanın son kısmında ise, Avrupa Birliği
entegrasyonu sürecinde, özellikle geçtiğimiz 15 yılda Türkiye’de yaşanan reform
süreçlerinin fazlasıyla etkilediğini düşündüğüm Göç ve Entegrasyon Yasaları
alanında yaşanan “Avrupalılaşma” deneyimine referansla 2014 yılının Nisan
ayında yürürlüğe giren Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Kanunu’nun göçmenlerin
entegrasyonu konusunda getirdiği yenilikler özetlenecektir.
Keywords
Göç politikaları uyum misafirperverlik hoşgörü Türkiye Avrupa
References
- Barkey, K. (2008). Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Çarkoğlu, A. and B. Toprak (2007). Religion, Society and Politics in a Changing Turkey. Istanbul: TESEV Publications.
- Cohen, A. J. (2004). “What Toleration Is,” Ethics, Vol.115, No. 1: 68-95.
- Cressey, P.G. (1932). The Taxi-Dance Hall. New York: Greenwood Press.
- Crul, M. and H. Vermeulen, eds. (2003). “The Future of the Second Generation: The Integration of Migrant Youth in Six European Countries”, Special issue of International Migration Review, Vol. 37, No. 4 (Winter): 965-986
- Foucault, M. (1979). “Governmentality”, Ideology and Consciousness 6: 5-21.
- Gordon, M. (1947). “The Concept of the Sub-Culture and its Application,” Social Forces (October).
- Kaya, A. (2012). Islam, Migration and Integration: The Age of Securitization. Lonodn: Palgrave.
- Kaya, A. (2013). Europeanization and Tolerance in Turkey: The Myth of Toleration. London: Palgrave.
- Noiriel, G. (1998). Le creuset français: Historie de l’immigration XIXe-XXe siécle. Paris: Seuil.
- Park, R.E. et al. (1925). The City. London: University of Chicago Press.
- Tribalat, M. (2003). “The French ‘Melting Pot’: Outdated – or in need of reinvention?” in S. Milner and N. Parsons (eds.), Reinventing France: State and Society in the Twenty-First Century. Hampshire: Palgrave: 127 – 142.
- Ülker, E. (2007). “Assimilation of the Muslim communities in the first decade of the Turkish Republic (1923-1934),” European Journal of Turkish Studies, Articles, URL: http://www.ejts.org/document822.html
- Vertovec, S. and S. Wessendorf, eds. (2010). The Multiculturalism Backlash: European discourses, policies and practices. London: Routledge: 32-49.
- Yıldız, A. (2001). Ne mutlu Türküm diyebilene: Türk ulusal kimliğinin etmo-seküler sınırları (1919-1938), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Abstract
This article aims to scrutinize the debates on
integration of migrants from a historical perspective from the Ottomans to the
contemporary Turkey, which has already become a country of immigration. Hence,
it will primarily question the ways in which the state actors have so far
perceived the migrants coming from different ethno-cultural and religious
backgrounds. In doing so, American and European debates on integration will
also be summarized to shed light upon similar debates in Turkey now. In the
last section of the article, the current Law on Foreigners and International
Protection enacted in April 2014 will be discussed with regard to the
improvements it has brought to the integration of migrants in Turkey. The
analysis of the new law will be based on an assumption that the European
integration process has so far impacted on migration and integration laws the
most, leading to the Europeanization of those laws through various policy
transfers.
References
- Barkey, K. (2008). Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Çarkoğlu, A. and B. Toprak (2007). Religion, Society and Politics in a Changing Turkey. Istanbul: TESEV Publications.
- Cohen, A. J. (2004). “What Toleration Is,” Ethics, Vol.115, No. 1: 68-95.
- Cressey, P.G. (1932). The Taxi-Dance Hall. New York: Greenwood Press.
- Crul, M. and H. Vermeulen, eds. (2003). “The Future of the Second Generation: The Integration of Migrant Youth in Six European Countries”, Special issue of International Migration Review, Vol. 37, No. 4 (Winter): 965-986
- Foucault, M. (1979). “Governmentality”, Ideology and Consciousness 6: 5-21.
- Gordon, M. (1947). “The Concept of the Sub-Culture and its Application,” Social Forces (October).
- Kaya, A. (2012). Islam, Migration and Integration: The Age of Securitization. Lonodn: Palgrave.
- Kaya, A. (2013). Europeanization and Tolerance in Turkey: The Myth of Toleration. London: Palgrave.
- Noiriel, G. (1998). Le creuset français: Historie de l’immigration XIXe-XXe siécle. Paris: Seuil.
- Park, R.E. et al. (1925). The City. London: University of Chicago Press.
- Tribalat, M. (2003). “The French ‘Melting Pot’: Outdated – or in need of reinvention?” in S. Milner and N. Parsons (eds.), Reinventing France: State and Society in the Twenty-First Century. Hampshire: Palgrave: 127 – 142.
- Ülker, E. (2007). “Assimilation of the Muslim communities in the first decade of the Turkish Republic (1923-1934),” European Journal of Turkish Studies, Articles, URL: http://www.ejts.org/document822.html
- Vertovec, S. and S. Wessendorf, eds. (2010). The Multiculturalism Backlash: European discourses, policies and practices. London: Routledge: 32-49.
- Yıldız, A. (2001). Ne mutlu Türküm diyebilene: Türk ulusal kimliğinin etmo-seküler sınırları (1919-1938), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | April 26, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2014 Volume: 5 Issue: 14 |
