Residential Satisfaction in Horizontal Gated Housing Settlements of Diyarbakır, Turkey

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 24, 485 - 514, 31.08.2018

Ayhan Bekleyen , Bahar Aras Baylan

https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.441475

Cited By: 2

Öz

Gated
communities or gated housing settlements, which are living spaces with strictly
controlled entrances, have become indispensable parts of the big cities in
Turkey, like most other countries in the world. The number of these
settlements, first built in 2000s, has also been increasing in Diyarbakir, one
of the largest cities in the southeastern part of Turkey. However, the number
of studies examining the users’ attitude towards gated housing settlements in
the city is quite limited. To provide a user-centered examination of these
settlements is quite valuable in terms of satisfying user expectations in
prospective designs. For the purposes of the present study, three gated housing
settlements in Diyarbakır were examined in terms of the satisfaction levels of
the residents. Data were collected through the administration of a
questionnaire and a semi-structured interview to 105 participants. The findings
indicate that the satisfaction levels of the users vary depending on the
settlements. The results also show that individuals living in horizontal gated
housing settlements have a higher perception of place attachment and property
value and that living in a secure or reputable neighborhood is their main
priority. It has also been determined that the users are intimidated by the
idea of living in a non-gated settlement, which reveals the importance of the
preference of security for the residents of the gated housing settlements in
the city. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Residential satisfaction, user preference, user satisfaction level, security, prestigious residential area

Diyarbakır’ın Yatayda Gelişen Dışa Kapalı Konut Yerleşmelerinde Yaşam Alanı Memnuniyeti

Öz

Sınırlı giriş
özelliklerine sahip yaşam alanları olan kapalı topluluklar ya da dışa kapalı
konut yerleşmeleri, dünyadaki örneklerinde olduğu gibi Türkiye’de de büyük
şehirlerin vazgeçilmez parçaları olmaktadır. Türkiye’nin güneydoğusundaki büyük
şehirlerden biri olan Diyarbakır’da da 2000 yılından itibaren üretilmeye
başlayan bu yerleşmelerin sayıları artmaktadır. Ancak bu şehirde kullanıcıların
kapalı konut yerleşmelerine karşı tutumlarını inceleyen çalışmaların sayısı
oldukça sınırlıdır. Bu yerleşmelerin kullanıcı merkezli incelenmesi,
gelecekteki tasarımlarda kullanıcı beklentilerinin karşılanması bakımından
oldukça önemlidir. Bu amaçla, Diyarbakır’da yatayda gelişen üç dışa kapalı
konut yerleşmesi kullanıcıların memnuniyet seviyeleri bakımından incelenmiştir.
Veriler, 105 katılımcıya uygulanan bir anket ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme
tekniği ile toplanmıştır. Bulgular, kullanıcıların memnuniyet seviyelerinin
yerleşmelere bağlı olarak değiştiğini göstermektedir. Yatayda gelişen dışa
kapalı konut yerleşmelerinde yaşayan bireylerin yere bağlanma ve mülk değeri
algılarının yüksek olduğu ve güvenli ya da saygın bir muhitte yaşama tercihini
ön planda tuttukları belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca bu tür yerleşmelerin dışındaki bir
yaşamın kullanıcıları korkuttuğu da belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuç, kullanıcılar tercihleri
bakımından güvenliğin ne kadar önemli olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yaşam alanı memnuniyeti, kullanıcı tercihi, kullanıcı memnuniyet seviyesi, güvenlik, prestijli yaşam alanı, prestijli yaşam alanı

Kaynakça

• Adams, R. E. ve Serpe, R. T. (2000). Social integration, fear of crime, and life satisfaction. Sociological Perspectives, 43(4), 605–629.
• Addington, L. A. ve Rennison, C. M. (2013). Keeping the barbarians outside the gate? Comparing burglary victimization in gated and non-gated communities. Justice Quarterly, 32(1), 168-192.
• Adriaanse, C. C. M. (2007). Measuring residential satisfaction: a residential environmental satisfaction scale (RESS). Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22(3), 287–304.
• Almatarneh, R. ve Mansour, Y. (2013). The role of advertisements in the marketing of gated communities as a new western suburban lifestyle: a case study of the Greater Cairo Region, Egypt. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28(3), 505-528.
• Amerigo, M. ve Aragones, J. I. (1997). A Theoretical and Methodological Approach to the Study of Residential Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(1), 47-57.
• Andersen, H. S. (2008). Why do residents want to leave deprived neighbourhoods? The importance of residents' subjective evaluations of their neighbourhood and its reputation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23(2), 79-101.
• Armitage, R., Monchuk, L. ve Rogerson, M. (2011). It looks good, but what is it like to live there? Exploring the impact of innovative housing design on crime. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 17(1), 29–54.
• Asiedu, A. B. ve Arku, G. (2009). The rise of gated housing estates in Ghana: Empirical insights from three communities in metropolitan Accra. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(3), 227-247.
• Atkinson, R. ve Flint, J. (2004). Fortress UK? Gated Communities, the Spatial Revolt of the Elites and Time–Space Trajectories of Segregation. Housing Studies, 19(6), 875-892.
• Basolo, V. & Strong, D. (2002). Understanding the neighborhood: From residents’ perceptions and needs to action. Housing Policy Debate, 13(1), 83 – 105.
• Bekleyen, A. ve Korkmaz, N. M. (2013). An evaluation of Akabe mass housing settlement in Sanliurfa, Turkey. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28(2), 293–309.
• Bekleyen, A. ve Yılmaz-Ay, İ. (2016). Are gated communities indispensable for residents? Urbani Izziv, 27(1), 149-161.
• Blakely, E. J. ve Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
• Blandy, S. (2006). Gated communities in England: Historical perspectives and current developments. Geojournal, 66(1-2), 15-26.
• Blandy, S. ve Lister, D. (2005). Gated commmunities: (ne)gating community development? Housing Studies, 20(2), 287-301.
• Branic, N. ve Kubrin, C. (2018). Gated communities and crime in the United States. In G. Bruinsma, & S. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Criminology (pp. 405-427). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Breetzke, G., Landman, K. ve Cohn, E. G. (2014). Is it safer behind the gates? Crime and gated communities in South Africa. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(1), 123-139.
• Brown, B., Perkins, D. D. ve Brown, G. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 259-271.
• Carpiano, R. M. (2007). Neighborhood social capital and adult health: an empirical test of a Bourdieu-based model. Health and Place, 13(3), 639-655.
• Checa, J.-C., Arjona, A. (2010). Residential satisfaction in a context of urban exclusion. Psyecology, 1(2), 221-237.
• Comstock, N., Dickinson, L. M., Marshall, J. A., Soobader, M-J., Turbin, M. S., Buchenau, M. ve Litt, J. S. (2010). Neighborhood attachment and its correlates: Exploring neighborhood conditions, collective efficacy, and gardening. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 435-442.
• Coy, M. ve Pöhler, M. (2002). Gated communities in latin american megacities: Case studies in Brazil and Argentina. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 29(3), 355-370.
• Ellin, N. (2001). Thresholds of fear: Embracing the urban shadow. Urban Studies, 38(5-6), 869-883.
• Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Majedi, H. ve Paydar, M. (2017). Assessment of residential satisfaction in Mehr Housing Scheme: A case study of Sadra New Town, Iran. Housing, Theory and Society, 34(3), 323-342.
• Fang, Y. (2006). Residential satisfaction, moving intention and moving behaviours: A study of redeveloped neighbourhoods in Inner-City Beijing. Housing Studies, 21(5), 671-694.
• Galster, G. C. ve Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential satisfaction: compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13(6), 735-758.
• Grant, J. (2005). Planning Responses to Gated Communities in Canada. Housing Studies, 20(2), 273-285.
• Grant, J. ve Mittelsteadt, L. (2004). Types of gated communities. Environment and Planning B: Planing and Design, 31(6), 913-930.
• Grundström, K. (2018). Grindsamhalle: the rise of urban gating and gated housing in Sweden. Housing Studies, 33(1), 18-39.
• Hedayati-Marzbali, M., Tilaki, M. ve Abdullah, A. (2017). Assessing the effect of neighbourhood structure on residents' perceptions of safety in gated communities: A case study of Iran. Safer Communities, 16(1), 3-19.
• Hipp, J. (2010). What is the “neighbourhood” in neighbourhood satisfaction? Comparing the effects of structural characteristics measured at the micro-neighbourhood and tract levels. Urban Studies, 47(12), 2517 – 2536.
• Ibem, E.O. ve Aduwo, E.B. (2013). Assessment of residential satisfaction in public housing in Ogun State, Nigeria. Habitat International, 40(2013), 163-175.
• Khruakham, S ve Lee, J., (2014). Terrorism and other determinants of fear of crime in the Philippines. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 16(1), 1-15.
• Lang, R. E. ve Danielsen, K. A. (1997). Gated communities in America: Walling out the world? Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 867-899.
• Le Goix, R. (2005). Gated communities: sprawl and social segregation in Southern California. Housing Studies, 20(2), 323-343.
• Le Goix, R. (2006). Gated communities as predators of public resources: The outcomes of fading boundaries between private management and public authorities in southern California. G. Glasze, C.J. Webster ve K. Frantz (Eds.), Private Neighbourhoods: Global and local perspectives (pp. 76-91). London: Routledge.
• Le Goix, R. ve Webster, C.J. (2008). Gated communities. Geography Compass, 2(4), 1189-1214.
• Li, Z. ve Wu, F. (2013). Residential satisfaction in china’s informal settlements: A case study of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Urban Geography, 34(7), 923 – 949.
• Liu, A. M. M. (1999). Residential satisfaction in housing estates: A Hong Kong perspective. Automation in Construction, 8(4), 511–524.
• Low, S. (2003). Behind the gates: Life, security and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. New York and London: Routledge.
• Lu, M. (1998). Analysing migration decision making: relationships between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions, and moving behavior. Environment and Planning A, 30(8), 1473-1495.
• Lu, M. (1999). Determinants of residential satisfaction: Ordered logit vs. regression models. Growth and Change, 30(2), pp. 264-287.
• Mahgoub, Y. ve Khalfani, F. (2012). Sustainability of gated communities in developing countries. Developing Country Studies, 2(6), 53-63.
• Mcdonell, J. R. (2006). Neighborhood characteristics, parenting, and children's safety. Social Indicators Research, 83(1), 177-199.
• Mohit, M. A., Ibrahim, M. ve Rashid, Y. R. (2010). Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 34(1), 18–27.
• Newmann, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Macmillan.
• Paris, D. E. ve Kangari, R. (2005). Multifamily Affordable Housing: Residential Satisfaction. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 19(2), 138-145.
• Parkes, A., Kearns, A. ve Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413–2438.
• Pociute, G. ve Krupickaite, D. (2008). Gated communities in Lithuania: Tendencies and peculiarities (A case of Vilnius and its environs). Annales Geographicae, 40(2), 14-27.
• Polanska, D. (2010). The emergence of gated communities in post-communist urban context: and the reasons for their increasing popularity. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(3), 295-312.
• Richter, C. ve Goetz, A. (2007). Gated communities in the Denver-boulder metropolitan area: Characteristics, spatial distribution, and residents' motivations. Housing Policy Debate, 18(3), 535-555.
• Roitman, S. (2010). Gated communities: definitions, causes and consequences. Urban Design and Planning, 163(1), 31-38.
• Roitman, S. (2005). Who segregates whom? The analysis of a gated community in Mendoza, Argentina. Housing Studies, 20(2), 303-321.
• Rollwagen, H. (2014). The relationship between dwelling type and fear of crime. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 365-387.
• Roming, K. (2005). The upper Sonoran lifestyle: Gated communities in Scottsdale, Arizona. City and Community, 4(1), 67-86.
• Ross, S. ve Turner, M. (2005). Housing discrimination in Metropolitan America: Explaining changes between 1989-2000. Social Problems, 5(2), 152-180.
• Şahin, P. ve Şener, S.M. (2018) Türkiye’de konut söylemlerinde yaşanan değişimin reklamlar üzerinden analizi – İstanbul örneği. İDEALKENT - Kent Araştırmaları Dergisi, 23(9), 258-291.
• Sampson, R. ve Groves, W. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774-802.
• Tabernero, C., Briones, E. ve Cuadrado, E. (2010). Changes in residential satisfaction and place attachment over time. Psyecology, 1(3), 403-412.
• Tanülkü, B. (2012) Gated communities: From "self-sufficient towns" to "active urban agents". Geoforum, 43(2012), 518-528.
• Tomaszewski, W. ve Perales, F. (2014). Who settles for less? Subjective Dispositions, Objective Circumstances, and Housing Satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 181-203.
• Vera-Toscano, E. ve Ateca-Amestoy, V. (2008). The relevance of social interactions on housing satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 86(2), 257–274.
• Vesselinov, E. ve Le Goix, R. (2012). From picket fences to iron gates: Suburbanization and gated communities in Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Seattle. GeoJournal, 77(2), 203-222.
• Wang, D. ve Li, S. (2006). Socio-economic differentials and stated housing preferences in Guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 30(2), 305 – 326.
• Wang, D. ve Wang, F. (2016). Contributions of the Usage and Affective Experience of the Residential Environment to Residential Satisfaction. Housing Studies, 31(1), 42-60.
• Wiedemann, S. ve Anderson, J. R. (1985). A conceptual framework for residental satisfaction. In I. Altman, & C. Werner (Eds.), Home Environments (pp. 153-182). New York: Plenum Press.
• Wiesenfeld, E. (1992). Public housing evaluation in Venezuela: a case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(3), 213-223.
• Yao, Q. ve Wei, W. (2012). Gated community: The past and present in China. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 6(11), 2890-2892.
• Yılmaz-Ay, İ. (2013). Diyarbakır'daki dışa kapalı konut yerleşmelerinde kullanıcı memnuniyetinin incelenmesi: Hamravat ve Gökkuşağı Yerleşmeleri. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Dicle Üniversitesi, Diyarbakır.