Review
BibTex RIS Cite

HEMŞİRELİK EĞİTİMİNDE EĞİTİM PROGRAMI DEĞERLENDİRME ÇALIŞMALARI: SİSTEMATİK DERLEME

Year 2022, , 285 - 303, 30.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.52538/iduhes.994386

Abstract

Amaç: Bu sistematik derleme, hemşirelik eğitim programlarının geliştirilmesi ve iyileştirilmesinde önemli bir rol oynayan eğitim programı değerlendirme çalışmalarını sistematik olarak incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntem: Bu sistematik derlemede PRISMA bildirimi kontrol listesinden yararlanılmıştır. “Science Direct” ve “Google Scholar” veri tabanları taranarak ulaşılan makaleler çalışmanın evrenini oluşturmuştur. Bu taramalar; “curriculum evaluation”, “nursing curriculum evaluation”, “curriculum evaluation in nursing education”, “curriculum evaluation and nursing education” “curriculum evaluation in nursing” ve “curriculum evaluation and nursing” anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak İngilizce olarak yapılmıştır. Sistematik derlemeye; Ocak 2015-Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında araştırma ya da derleme olarak yayımlanmış, yayın dili İngilizce olan, anahtar kelimeleri yayın başlığında yer alan, tam metnine ulaşılabilen ve hemşirelik eğitim programlarının değerlendirildiği makaleler dahil edilmiştir. Sistematik derlemeye dahil edilme kriterlerini karşılayan toplam 17 çalışma örneklemi oluşturmuştur. Veri analizi, araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan veri özetleme formu doğrultusunda yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Sistematik derlemede araştırma sorularına ilişkin bulgular beş başlık altında verilmiştir. Bu başlıklar; hemşirelik eğitim programı değerlendirme çalışmalarında kullanılan araştırma tasarımları, görüş alınan paydaşlar, kullanılan veri toplama araçları ve teknikleri, program değerlendirme çalışmalarına göre hemşirelik eğitim programları etkililiği ve kullanılan program değerlendirme modelleridir. Sonuç: Program değerlendirme çalışmalarının ve buna paralel olarak yapılacak yayınların niteliğinin ve niceliğinin artması; nitelikli eğitim programlarının tasarlanması ve iyileştirilmesinde alanda çalışan eğitimcilere yol gösterici olacaktır.

References

  • Ardisson, M., Smallheer, B., Moore, G., & Christenbery, T. (2015). Meta-evaluation: Experiences in an accelerated graduate nurse education program. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(6), 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.04.009
  • Ashghali-Farahani, M., Ghaffari, F., Hoseini-Esfidarjani, S. S., Hadian, Z., Qomi, R., & Dargahi, H. (2018). Neonatal Intensive Care Nursing curriculum challenges based on context, input, process, and product evaluation model: A qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 23(2), 111–118.
  • Bagley, K. A., Dunn, S. E., Chuang, E. Y., Dorr, V. J., Thompson, J. A., Smith, S. K., Oncology, T., & Initiative, I. (2018). Nonspecialty Nurse Education: Evaluation of the Oncology Intensives Initiative, an Oncology Curriculum to Improve Patient Care. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 22(2), E44–E51.
  • Bai, B., Li, S. Y., Wang, B. Y., Zhang, Z. M., & Sun, L. Q. (2016). Application and evaluation of improved surgical aseptic technique curriculum in specialty nurse training in Henan Province. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 3(3), 281–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.08.001
  • Bay, E., & Karakaya, Ş. (2006). Program Değerlendirme Sürecinde Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 104–112.
  • Bourke, M. P., & Ihrke, B. A. (2012). The Evaluation Process: An Overview. In D. M. Billings & J. A. Halstead (Eds.), Teaching in Nursing A Guide for Faculty (4th ed., pp. 422–440). Elsevier.
  • Brown, A., Dewing, J., & Crookes, P. (2016). Clinical leadership and pre-registration nursing programmes: A model for clinical leadership and a prospective curriculum implementation and evaluation research strategy. Nurse Education Today, 42, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.027
  • Chowthi-Williams, A., Curzio, J., & Lerman, S. (2016). Evaluation of how a curriculum change in nurse education was managed through the application of a business change management model: A qualitative case study. Nurse Education Today, 36, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.023
  • Conroy, S. F. (2017). Program Evaluation. In M. J. Bradshaw & B. L. Hultquist (Eds.), Innovative Teaching Strategies in Nursing and Related Health Professions (7th ed., pp. 471–481). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • Dale, J. G., & Dale, B. (2017). Implementing a new pedagogy in the nursing curriculum: Bachelor students’ evaluation. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 7(12), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v7n12p98
  • Demirel, Ö. (2019). Eğitimde Program Geliştirme Kuramdan Uygulamaya (26. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  • Devadas, B. (2016). A Critical Review of Qualitative Research Methods in Evaluating Nursing Curriculum Models : Implication for Nursing Education in the Arab World. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(7), 119–126.
  • Diefenbeck, C., Herrman, J., Wade, G., Hayes, E., Voelmeck, W., Cowperthwait, A., & Norris, S. (2015). Preparedness for Clinical: Evaluation of the Core Elements of the Clinical Immersion Curriculum Model. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(2), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.08.004
  • Dreier, A., Thyrian, J. R., Eichler, T., & Hoffmann, W. (2016). Qualifications for nurses for the care of patients with dementia and support to their caregivers: A pilot evaluation of the dementia care management curriculum. Nurse Education Today, 36, 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.07.024
  • Gamble, A. S. (2017). Simulation in undergraduate paediatric nursing curriculum: Evaluation of a complex ‘ward for a day’ education program. Nurse Education in Practice, 23, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.02.001
  • Ghaffari, F., Dehghan-Nayeri, N., Navabi, N., & Seylani, K. (2016). Evaluation of the Master’s curriculum for elderly nursing: A qualitative study. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 11, 1333–1342. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S109004
  • Giddens, J. F., & Morton, N. (2010). Report Card : An Evaluation of a Concept-Based Curriculum. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(6), 372–377.
  • Goode, D., Black, P., & Lynch, J. (2019). Person-centred end-of-life curriculum design in adult pre-registration undergraduate nurse education: A three-year longitudinal evaluation study. Nurse Education Today, 82, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.07.009
  • Gülpınar, M. . (2008). Program değerlendirme yaklaşım ve yöntemleri. In T. (yayına hazırlayan) Dağlı (Ed.), TTB – UDEK Ulusal Yeterlik Kurulu III. Çalıştayı Tıpta Uzmanlık Eğitiminde Program Geliştirme ve Ölçme-Değerlendirme Çalıştay Kitabı (pp. 92–102). İstanbul Türk Tabipleri Birliği Yayınları.
  • Jerlock, M., Falk, K., & Severinsson, E. (2003). Academic nursing education guidelines: Tool for bridging the gap between theory, research and practice. Nursing and Health Sciences, 5(3), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2018.2003.00156.x
  • Kumm, S., & Laverentz, D. M. (2017). Concept-Based Curriculum Evaluation: 5-Year Process. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 12(4), 242–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.06.004
  • Kürüm Yapıcıoğlu, D., Atik Kara, D., & Sever, D. (2016). Türkiye’de Program Değerlendirme Çalışmalarında Eğilimler ve Sorunlar: Alan Uzmanlarının Gözüyle. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 6(12), 91–113.
  • Lippe, M., & Carter, P. (2018). Using the CIPP Model to Assess Nursing Education Program Quality and Merit. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.09.008
  • Lippe, M., Volker, D., Jones, T., & Carter, P. (2017). Evaluating end-of-life care education within nursing programs. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, 19(3), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000000341
  • Loriz, L., & Foster, P. (2001). Focus Groups: Powerful Adjuncts for Program Evaluation. Nursing Forum, 36(3), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2001.tb00247.x
  • Mansour, M., Skull, A., & Parker, M. (2015). Evaluation of World Health Organization Multi-Professional Patient Safety Curriculum Topics in Nursing Education: Pre-test, post-test, none-experimental study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(5), 432–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.03.002
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1006-1012.
  • Özdemir, S. M. (2009). Eğitimde program değerlendirme ve Türkiye’de eğitim programlarını değerlendirme çalışmalarının incelenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 126–149.
  • Şahin, H. (2016). Tıp eğitiminde program geliştirme. In İ. Sayek (Ed.), Tıp Eğiticisi El Kitabı (pp. 57–72). Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri.
  • Şeker, H. (2014). Program Değerlendirme. In H. Şeker (Ed.), Eğitimde Program Geliştirme Kavramlar Yaklaşımlar (3.Baskı, pp. 183–218). Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Shen, L., Yang, J., Jin, X., Hou, L., Shang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Evaluating the quality of simulation teaching in Fundamental Nursing Curriculum: AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Nurse Education Today, 77, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.03.012
  • Shen, L., Zeng, H., Jin, X., Yang, J., Shang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2018). An Innovative Evaluation in Fundamental Nursing Curriculum for Novice Nursing Students: An Observational Research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(5), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.05.002
  • Sönmez, V., & Alacapınar, F. G. (2015). Örnekleriyle eğitimde program değerlendirme. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Staples, S. (2019). Using corpus-based discourse analysis for curriculum development: Creating and evaluating a pronunciation course for internationally educated nurses. English for Specific Purposes, 53, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.08.005
  • Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluations Models viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 279–317). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Suhayda, R., & Miller, J. M. (2006). Optimizing evaluation of nursing education programs. Nurse Educator, 31(5), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-200609000- 00005
  • Uşun, S. (2016). Eğitimde program değerlendirme süreçler-yaklaşımlar ve modeller (2. Baskı). Anı Yayıncılık.
Year 2022, , 285 - 303, 30.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.52538/iduhes.994386

Abstract

References

  • Ardisson, M., Smallheer, B., Moore, G., & Christenbery, T. (2015). Meta-evaluation: Experiences in an accelerated graduate nurse education program. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(6), 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.04.009
  • Ashghali-Farahani, M., Ghaffari, F., Hoseini-Esfidarjani, S. S., Hadian, Z., Qomi, R., & Dargahi, H. (2018). Neonatal Intensive Care Nursing curriculum challenges based on context, input, process, and product evaluation model: A qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 23(2), 111–118.
  • Bagley, K. A., Dunn, S. E., Chuang, E. Y., Dorr, V. J., Thompson, J. A., Smith, S. K., Oncology, T., & Initiative, I. (2018). Nonspecialty Nurse Education: Evaluation of the Oncology Intensives Initiative, an Oncology Curriculum to Improve Patient Care. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 22(2), E44–E51.
  • Bai, B., Li, S. Y., Wang, B. Y., Zhang, Z. M., & Sun, L. Q. (2016). Application and evaluation of improved surgical aseptic technique curriculum in specialty nurse training in Henan Province. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 3(3), 281–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.08.001
  • Bay, E., & Karakaya, Ş. (2006). Program Değerlendirme Sürecinde Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 104–112.
  • Bourke, M. P., & Ihrke, B. A. (2012). The Evaluation Process: An Overview. In D. M. Billings & J. A. Halstead (Eds.), Teaching in Nursing A Guide for Faculty (4th ed., pp. 422–440). Elsevier.
  • Brown, A., Dewing, J., & Crookes, P. (2016). Clinical leadership and pre-registration nursing programmes: A model for clinical leadership and a prospective curriculum implementation and evaluation research strategy. Nurse Education Today, 42, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.027
  • Chowthi-Williams, A., Curzio, J., & Lerman, S. (2016). Evaluation of how a curriculum change in nurse education was managed through the application of a business change management model: A qualitative case study. Nurse Education Today, 36, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.023
  • Conroy, S. F. (2017). Program Evaluation. In M. J. Bradshaw & B. L. Hultquist (Eds.), Innovative Teaching Strategies in Nursing and Related Health Professions (7th ed., pp. 471–481). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • Dale, J. G., & Dale, B. (2017). Implementing a new pedagogy in the nursing curriculum: Bachelor students’ evaluation. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 7(12), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v7n12p98
  • Demirel, Ö. (2019). Eğitimde Program Geliştirme Kuramdan Uygulamaya (26. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  • Devadas, B. (2016). A Critical Review of Qualitative Research Methods in Evaluating Nursing Curriculum Models : Implication for Nursing Education in the Arab World. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(7), 119–126.
  • Diefenbeck, C., Herrman, J., Wade, G., Hayes, E., Voelmeck, W., Cowperthwait, A., & Norris, S. (2015). Preparedness for Clinical: Evaluation of the Core Elements of the Clinical Immersion Curriculum Model. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(2), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.08.004
  • Dreier, A., Thyrian, J. R., Eichler, T., & Hoffmann, W. (2016). Qualifications for nurses for the care of patients with dementia and support to their caregivers: A pilot evaluation of the dementia care management curriculum. Nurse Education Today, 36, 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.07.024
  • Gamble, A. S. (2017). Simulation in undergraduate paediatric nursing curriculum: Evaluation of a complex ‘ward for a day’ education program. Nurse Education in Practice, 23, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.02.001
  • Ghaffari, F., Dehghan-Nayeri, N., Navabi, N., & Seylani, K. (2016). Evaluation of the Master’s curriculum for elderly nursing: A qualitative study. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 11, 1333–1342. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S109004
  • Giddens, J. F., & Morton, N. (2010). Report Card : An Evaluation of a Concept-Based Curriculum. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(6), 372–377.
  • Goode, D., Black, P., & Lynch, J. (2019). Person-centred end-of-life curriculum design in adult pre-registration undergraduate nurse education: A three-year longitudinal evaluation study. Nurse Education Today, 82, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.07.009
  • Gülpınar, M. . (2008). Program değerlendirme yaklaşım ve yöntemleri. In T. (yayına hazırlayan) Dağlı (Ed.), TTB – UDEK Ulusal Yeterlik Kurulu III. Çalıştayı Tıpta Uzmanlık Eğitiminde Program Geliştirme ve Ölçme-Değerlendirme Çalıştay Kitabı (pp. 92–102). İstanbul Türk Tabipleri Birliği Yayınları.
  • Jerlock, M., Falk, K., & Severinsson, E. (2003). Academic nursing education guidelines: Tool for bridging the gap between theory, research and practice. Nursing and Health Sciences, 5(3), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2018.2003.00156.x
  • Kumm, S., & Laverentz, D. M. (2017). Concept-Based Curriculum Evaluation: 5-Year Process. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 12(4), 242–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.06.004
  • Kürüm Yapıcıoğlu, D., Atik Kara, D., & Sever, D. (2016). Türkiye’de Program Değerlendirme Çalışmalarında Eğilimler ve Sorunlar: Alan Uzmanlarının Gözüyle. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 6(12), 91–113.
  • Lippe, M., & Carter, P. (2018). Using the CIPP Model to Assess Nursing Education Program Quality and Merit. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.09.008
  • Lippe, M., Volker, D., Jones, T., & Carter, P. (2017). Evaluating end-of-life care education within nursing programs. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, 19(3), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000000341
  • Loriz, L., & Foster, P. (2001). Focus Groups: Powerful Adjuncts for Program Evaluation. Nursing Forum, 36(3), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2001.tb00247.x
  • Mansour, M., Skull, A., & Parker, M. (2015). Evaluation of World Health Organization Multi-Professional Patient Safety Curriculum Topics in Nursing Education: Pre-test, post-test, none-experimental study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(5), 432–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.03.002
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1006-1012.
  • Özdemir, S. M. (2009). Eğitimde program değerlendirme ve Türkiye’de eğitim programlarını değerlendirme çalışmalarının incelenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 126–149.
  • Şahin, H. (2016). Tıp eğitiminde program geliştirme. In İ. Sayek (Ed.), Tıp Eğiticisi El Kitabı (pp. 57–72). Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri.
  • Şeker, H. (2014). Program Değerlendirme. In H. Şeker (Ed.), Eğitimde Program Geliştirme Kavramlar Yaklaşımlar (3.Baskı, pp. 183–218). Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Shen, L., Yang, J., Jin, X., Hou, L., Shang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Evaluating the quality of simulation teaching in Fundamental Nursing Curriculum: AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Nurse Education Today, 77, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.03.012
  • Shen, L., Zeng, H., Jin, X., Yang, J., Shang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2018). An Innovative Evaluation in Fundamental Nursing Curriculum for Novice Nursing Students: An Observational Research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(5), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.05.002
  • Sönmez, V., & Alacapınar, F. G. (2015). Örnekleriyle eğitimde program değerlendirme. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Staples, S. (2019). Using corpus-based discourse analysis for curriculum development: Creating and evaluating a pronunciation course for internationally educated nurses. English for Specific Purposes, 53, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.08.005
  • Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluations Models viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 279–317). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Suhayda, R., & Miller, J. M. (2006). Optimizing evaluation of nursing education programs. Nurse Educator, 31(5), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-200609000- 00005
  • Uşun, S. (2016). Eğitimde program değerlendirme süreçler-yaklaşımlar ve modeller (2. Baskı). Anı Yayıncılık.
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Nursing
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gülsüm Çonoğlu 0000-0001-8606-3149

Fatma Orgun 0000-0002-2351-7227

Nilay Özkütük 0000-0003-1405-4600

Publication Date September 30, 2022
Submission Date September 12, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022

Cite

APA Çonoğlu, G., Orgun, F., & Özkütük, N. (2022). HEMŞİRELİK EĞİTİMİNDE EĞİTİM PROGRAMI DEĞERLENDİRME ÇALIŞMALARI: SİSTEMATİK DERLEME. Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal, 5(2), 285-303. https://doi.org/10.52538/iduhes.994386

227151960619606                 19629                   19630 1995319957 

19952  19958  20682 

20686


23848