Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Enhancing or Hindering? AI's Role in Sparking Creativity in Language Teaching: Insights from Private High School EFL Teachers

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 18, 234 - 254, 27.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1502509

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence in education presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly in the field of language teaching. This study aims to investigate Turkish EFL teachers' perceptions of AI's role in fostering or hindering creativity in language teaching. Through semi-structured interviews with 10 EFL teachers from private high schools, the research explores the potential benefits and challenges of AI integration. Key findings reveal that AI enhances student engagement, provides personalized learning experiences, and offers timely feedback. However, concerns about insufficient training, technical issues, and over-reliance on AI potentially undermining fundamental skills were also expressed. While AI tools support improvements in language skills and foster creative thinking, there is apprehension about standardization and the risk of diminishing originality. The study underscores the necessity for effective teacher training and a balanced approach to AI integration, ensuring it complements rather than replaces traditional teaching methods. These insights provide valuable guidance for educators, policymakers, and technology developers to optimize AI use in EFL education while fostering a dynamic and creative learning environment. Future research should explore innovative ways to integrate AI into language teaching without compromising creativity.

References

  • Akça, C. & Özel, Y. (2023). The effect of mind and ıntelligence games on university students’ perceived stress and psychological well-being level. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11 (22), 447-458. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1252277
  • An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C., & Chen, M. (2023). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187-5208.
  • Avila, H. A. (2015). Creativity in English class: Activities to promote EFL learning. HOW, 22(2), 91-103.
  • Baghaei, S., & Riasati, M. J. (2015). An investigation into the relationship between teachers’ creativity and students’ academic achievement: A case study of Iran EFL context. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 4(2), 021–032.
  • Baskara, R., & Mukarto, M. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343-358.
  • Birkmaier, E. M. (1971). The meaning of creativity in foreign language teaching. Modern Language Journal, 55(6), 345–353.
  • Burton, P. (2010). Creativity in Hong Kong schools. World Englishes, 29 (4), 493-507.
  • Cavaleri, M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 10(1), 223–236.
  • Chappell, P. (2016). Creativity through inquiry dialogue. In R. H. Jones & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 130-145). Routledge.
  • Clarke, M. A. (2005). Creativity in modern foreign languages teaching and learning. Subject perspectives on creativity. Higher Education Academy. Retrieved July 20, 2024, from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/creativity-modern-foreign-languages-teaching-and-learning
  • Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge
  • Cremin, T. (2009). Teaching English creatively. Routledge.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2016). 30 Essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  • Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators. Kogan Page.
  • Eliott, L. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of AI in the EFL classroom. Kwansei Gakuin University.
  • Fisher, R. (2004). What is creativity? In R. Fisher & M. Williams (Eds.), Unlocking creativity: Teaching across the curriculum (pp. 6-20). Routledge.
  • Formosa, M. & Zammit, S. (2016) Colouring outside the lines. In D., Xerri & O.Vassallo (Eds), Creativity in English language teaching (pp.25-34). ELT Council.
  • Frost, N. (2011). Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches. Open University Press.
  • Gee, J. P. (2016). The vexed nature of language learning and teaching. In R. H. Jones & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: perspectives from research and practice (pp. 63-76). Routledge.
  • Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. SAGE Publications.
  • Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., ... & Buyya, R. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging era of AI chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19-23.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. The American psychologist, 34, 906–911.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 3–14.
  • Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students' argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54, 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
  • Han, Jong-Im. (2019). A study on integrating technology into English education to enhance Korean EFL learners’ creativity. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 179-208.
  • Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (3), 27–37.
  • Holmes, W. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. In S. C. Kong, H. Ogata, & A. S. M. Supnithi (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 761-765). Springer.
  • Hong, Z.-W., Huang, Y.-M., Hsu, M., & Shen, W.-W. (2016). Authoring robot-assisted instructional materials for improving learning performance and motivation in efl classrooms. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19, 337–349.
  • Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning- are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257.
  • Jiang R (2022) How does artificial intelligence empower EFL teaching and learning nowadays? A review on artificial intelligence in the EFL context. Front. Psychol. 13, 1049401.
  • Kim, N.-Y. (2019). A study on the use of artificial intelligence chatbots for improving English grammar skills. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(8), 37–46.
  • Kim, N.-Y., Cha, Y., & Kim, H.-S. (2019). Future English learning: Chatbots and artificial intelligence. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 22, 32–53.
  • Kim, N.-Y. (2020). Chatbots and language learning: Effects of the use of AI chatbots for EFL learning. Eliva Press.
  • Kose, U., & Arslan, A. (2015). E-learning experience with artificial intelligence supported software: An international application on English language courses. GLOKALde, 1(3), 61-75.
  • Liao, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-L., Chen, H.-C., & Chang, Y.-L. (2018). Infusing creative pedagogy into an English as a foreign language classroom: Learning performance, creativity, and motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 213–223.
  • Marrone, R., Taddeo, V., & Hill, G. (2022). Creativity and artificial intelligence- A student perspective. Journal of Intelligence, 10(65), 1-11.
  • Meşe, S., & Meşe, C. (2022). Research trends on digital games and gamification in nursing education. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 10 (20), 734-750. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1175412
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
  • National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE). (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. DFEE.
  • Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014.
  • Nordrum, A. (2017). CES 2017: The year of voice recognition. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/techtalk/consumerelectronics/gadgets/ces-2017-the-year-of-voice-recognition
  • Noviyanti, S. D. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI)- based pronunciation checker: An alternative for independent learning in pandemic situation. The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 5(2), 162.
  • Parra G, L., & Calero S, X. (2019). Automated writing evaluation tools in the improvement of the writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 209-226.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189-1208.
  • Pokrivčáková, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI- powered technologies in foreign lan-guage education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135–153.
  • Richards, J. C. (2013). Creativity in language teaching. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 19-43.
  • Ryabchenko, O.N., Sadykova A.R., Efimushkina S.V., Zaitseva N.A., Ishmuradova I.I., & Kislyakov A.S. (2021). IT club educational technologies for creative individual development in digital age. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 16(3), 1269-1278.
  • Seelig, T. (2012). In genius: A crash course on creativity. Harper Collins
  • Sercanoğlu, M., Bolat, Y. İ., & Göksu, İ. (2021). Kahoot! as a gamification tool in vocational education: More positive attitude, motivation and less anxiety in EFL. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9 (18), 682-701. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.9224882
  • Singh, P., Phutela, N., Grover, P., Sinha, D., & Sinha, S. (2023). Student’s perception of ChatGPT. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electrical, Communication and Computer Engineering (ICECCE) (pp. 30-31). UAE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCE56480.2023.00031
  • Stepanek, L. (2015). A creative approach to language teaching: a way to recognize, encourage and appreciate students' contribution to language classes. In A. Maley & N. Peachey (Eds.), Creativity in the English language classroom (pp. 98–103). British Council.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity? Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Sumakul, D. T. Y., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in efl classrooms: friend or foe? LEARN J. Lang. Educ. Acquisit. Res. Netw. 15, 232–256.
  • Tangaard, L. (2011). Stories about creative teaching and productive learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 219–232.
  • Tomlinson, B. (2015). Challenging teachers to use their coursebook creatively. In A. Maley & N. Peachey (Eds.), Creativity in the English language classroom (pp. 24–29). British Council.
  • Torrance, E. P., & Myers, R. E. (1970). Creative Learning and Teaching. NY: Dodd,Mead & Co
  • Xu, Z., Wijekumar, K., Ramirez, G., Hu, X., & Irey, R. (2019). The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K–12 pupils' reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3119–3137.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7-97.
  • Wang, Y. F., & Petrina, S. (2013). Using learning analytics to understand the design of an intelligent language tutor-chatbot Lucy. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(11), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.041117
  • Williams, T. (2023). GPT-4’s launch ‘another step change’ for AI and higher education. The Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/gpt-4s-launch-another-step-change-ai-and-higher-education
  • Wu, C.H., Lin, H.-C. K., Wang, T.-H., Huang, T.-H., & Huang, Y.-M. (2022). Affective mobile language tutoring system for supporting language learning. Front. Psychol, 13, 833327.
  • Yang, H., & Kyun, S. (2022). The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A sys-tematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 180–210
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418

Enhancing or Hindering? AI's Role in Sparking Creativity in Language Teaching: Insights from Private High School EFL Teachers

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 18, 234 - 254, 27.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1502509

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence in education presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly in the field of language teaching. This study aims to investigate Turkish EFL teachers' perceptions of AI's role in fostering or hindering creativity in language teaching. Through semi-structured interviews with 10 EFL teachers from private high schools, the research explores the potential benefits and challenges of AI integration. Key findings reveal that AI enhances student engagement, provides personalized learning experiences, and offers timely feedback. However, concerns about insufficient training, technical issues, and over-reliance on AI potentially undermining fundamental skills were also expressed. While AI tools support improvements in language skills and foster creative thinking, there is apprehension about standardization and the risk of diminishing originality. The study underscores the necessity for effective teacher training and a balanced approach to AI integration, ensuring it complements rather than replaces traditional teaching methods. These insights provide valuable guidance for educators, policymakers, and technology developers to optimize AI use in EFL education while fostering a dynamic and creative learning environment. Future research should explore innovative ways to integrate AI into language teaching without compromising creativity.

References

  • Akça, C. & Özel, Y. (2023). The effect of mind and ıntelligence games on university students’ perceived stress and psychological well-being level. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11 (22), 447-458. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1252277
  • An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C., & Chen, M. (2023). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187-5208.
  • Avila, H. A. (2015). Creativity in English class: Activities to promote EFL learning. HOW, 22(2), 91-103.
  • Baghaei, S., & Riasati, M. J. (2015). An investigation into the relationship between teachers’ creativity and students’ academic achievement: A case study of Iran EFL context. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 4(2), 021–032.
  • Baskara, R., & Mukarto, M. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343-358.
  • Birkmaier, E. M. (1971). The meaning of creativity in foreign language teaching. Modern Language Journal, 55(6), 345–353.
  • Burton, P. (2010). Creativity in Hong Kong schools. World Englishes, 29 (4), 493-507.
  • Cavaleri, M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 10(1), 223–236.
  • Chappell, P. (2016). Creativity through inquiry dialogue. In R. H. Jones & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 130-145). Routledge.
  • Clarke, M. A. (2005). Creativity in modern foreign languages teaching and learning. Subject perspectives on creativity. Higher Education Academy. Retrieved July 20, 2024, from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/creativity-modern-foreign-languages-teaching-and-learning
  • Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge
  • Cremin, T. (2009). Teaching English creatively. Routledge.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2016). 30 Essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  • Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators. Kogan Page.
  • Eliott, L. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of AI in the EFL classroom. Kwansei Gakuin University.
  • Fisher, R. (2004). What is creativity? In R. Fisher & M. Williams (Eds.), Unlocking creativity: Teaching across the curriculum (pp. 6-20). Routledge.
  • Formosa, M. & Zammit, S. (2016) Colouring outside the lines. In D., Xerri & O.Vassallo (Eds), Creativity in English language teaching (pp.25-34). ELT Council.
  • Frost, N. (2011). Qualitative research methods in psychology: Combining core approaches. Open University Press.
  • Gee, J. P. (2016). The vexed nature of language learning and teaching. In R. H. Jones & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: perspectives from research and practice (pp. 63-76). Routledge.
  • Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. SAGE Publications.
  • Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., ... & Buyya, R. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging era of AI chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19-23.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. The American psychologist, 34, 906–911.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 3–14.
  • Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students' argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54, 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
  • Han, Jong-Im. (2019). A study on integrating technology into English education to enhance Korean EFL learners’ creativity. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 179-208.
  • Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (3), 27–37.
  • Holmes, W. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. In S. C. Kong, H. Ogata, & A. S. M. Supnithi (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 761-765). Springer.
  • Hong, Z.-W., Huang, Y.-M., Hsu, M., & Shen, W.-W. (2016). Authoring robot-assisted instructional materials for improving learning performance and motivation in efl classrooms. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19, 337–349.
  • Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning- are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257.
  • Jiang R (2022) How does artificial intelligence empower EFL teaching and learning nowadays? A review on artificial intelligence in the EFL context. Front. Psychol. 13, 1049401.
  • Kim, N.-Y. (2019). A study on the use of artificial intelligence chatbots for improving English grammar skills. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(8), 37–46.
  • Kim, N.-Y., Cha, Y., & Kim, H.-S. (2019). Future English learning: Chatbots and artificial intelligence. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 22, 32–53.
  • Kim, N.-Y. (2020). Chatbots and language learning: Effects of the use of AI chatbots for EFL learning. Eliva Press.
  • Kose, U., & Arslan, A. (2015). E-learning experience with artificial intelligence supported software: An international application on English language courses. GLOKALde, 1(3), 61-75.
  • Liao, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-L., Chen, H.-C., & Chang, Y.-L. (2018). Infusing creative pedagogy into an English as a foreign language classroom: Learning performance, creativity, and motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 213–223.
  • Marrone, R., Taddeo, V., & Hill, G. (2022). Creativity and artificial intelligence- A student perspective. Journal of Intelligence, 10(65), 1-11.
  • Meşe, S., & Meşe, C. (2022). Research trends on digital games and gamification in nursing education. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 10 (20), 734-750. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1175412
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
  • National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE). (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. DFEE.
  • Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014.
  • Nordrum, A. (2017). CES 2017: The year of voice recognition. IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved from http://spectrum.ieee.org/techtalk/consumerelectronics/gadgets/ces-2017-the-year-of-voice-recognition
  • Noviyanti, S. D. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI)- based pronunciation checker: An alternative for independent learning in pandemic situation. The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 5(2), 162.
  • Parra G, L., & Calero S, X. (2019). Automated writing evaluation tools in the improvement of the writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 209-226.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189-1208.
  • Pokrivčáková, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI- powered technologies in foreign lan-guage education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135–153.
  • Richards, J. C. (2013). Creativity in language teaching. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 19-43.
  • Ryabchenko, O.N., Sadykova A.R., Efimushkina S.V., Zaitseva N.A., Ishmuradova I.I., & Kislyakov A.S. (2021). IT club educational technologies for creative individual development in digital age. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 16(3), 1269-1278.
  • Seelig, T. (2012). In genius: A crash course on creativity. Harper Collins
  • Sercanoğlu, M., Bolat, Y. İ., & Göksu, İ. (2021). Kahoot! as a gamification tool in vocational education: More positive attitude, motivation and less anxiety in EFL. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9 (18), 682-701. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.9224882
  • Singh, P., Phutela, N., Grover, P., Sinha, D., & Sinha, S. (2023). Student’s perception of ChatGPT. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electrical, Communication and Computer Engineering (ICECCE) (pp. 30-31). UAE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCE56480.2023.00031
  • Stepanek, L. (2015). A creative approach to language teaching: a way to recognize, encourage and appreciate students' contribution to language classes. In A. Maley & N. Peachey (Eds.), Creativity in the English language classroom (pp. 98–103). British Council.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity? Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Sumakul, D. T. Y., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in efl classrooms: friend or foe? LEARN J. Lang. Educ. Acquisit. Res. Netw. 15, 232–256.
  • Tangaard, L. (2011). Stories about creative teaching and productive learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 219–232.
  • Tomlinson, B. (2015). Challenging teachers to use their coursebook creatively. In A. Maley & N. Peachey (Eds.), Creativity in the English language classroom (pp. 24–29). British Council.
  • Torrance, E. P., & Myers, R. E. (1970). Creative Learning and Teaching. NY: Dodd,Mead & Co
  • Xu, Z., Wijekumar, K., Ramirez, G., Hu, X., & Irey, R. (2019). The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K–12 pupils' reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3119–3137.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7-97.
  • Wang, Y. F., & Petrina, S. (2013). Using learning analytics to understand the design of an intelligent language tutor-chatbot Lucy. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(11), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.041117
  • Williams, T. (2023). GPT-4’s launch ‘another step change’ for AI and higher education. The Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/gpt-4s-launch-another-step-change-ai-and-higher-education
  • Wu, C.H., Lin, H.-C. K., Wang, T.-H., Huang, T.-H., & Huang, Y.-M. (2022). Affective mobile language tutoring system for supporting language learning. Front. Psychol, 13, 833327.
  • Yang, H., & Kyun, S. (2022). The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A sys-tematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 180–210
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
There are 68 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Curriculum Development in Education
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Seçil Tümen Akyıldız 0000-0003-4116-7344

Early Pub Date September 23, 2024
Publication Date October 27, 2024
Submission Date June 18, 2024
Acceptance Date September 4, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 8 Issue: 18

Cite

APA Tümen Akyıldız, S. (2024). Enhancing or Hindering? AI’s Role in Sparking Creativity in Language Teaching: Insights from Private High School EFL Teachers. International E-Journal of Educational Studies, 8(18), 234-254. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1502509

21067   13894              13896           14842

We would like to share important news with you. International e-journal of Educational Studies indexed in EBSCO Education Full Text Database Coverage List H.W. Wilson Index since January 7th, 2020.
https://www.ebsco.com/m/ee/Marketing/titleLists/eft-coverage.pdf

IEJES has been indexed in the Education Source Ultimate database, which is the upper version of the Education Full Text (H.W. Wilson) and Education Full Text (H.W. Wilson) database, from 2020 to the present.

https://www.ebsco.com/m/ee/Marketing/titleLists/esu-coverage.htm

Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.