THE IMPACT OF THE CURRENCY PROTECTED DEPOSIT POLICY ON THE GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF THE BANKING SECTOR: AN ANALYSIS OF THE 2019-2024 PERIOD

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the Currency Protected Deposit (KKM) policy on the growth performance of the Turkish banking sector. For this purpose, the growth rates of loans, assets, deposits, equity, net interest income, non-interest income, and net profit in the pre-KKM period (2019–2021) and post-KKM period (2022–2024) were compared. Initially, based on the distributional characteristics of the variables, both parametric (T-Test) and non-parametric (Mann–Whitney U Test) methods were applied. In addition, the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) method was employed to evaluate the causal impact of the policy in a more robust econometric framework. The results from classical statistical tests revealed significant increases in loan, deposit, net profit, and net interest income growth rates during the post-KKM period. These findings suggest that the KKM policy created short-term positive effects on banks’ funding capacity, lending activities, and profitability. However, regression results obtained from the DiD method indicate that the KKM policy had a statistically significant and positive effect only on deposit and equity growth rates, while its effects on loans, net profit, and interest income growth were not statistically significant. This divergence implies that the effects of the KKM policy vary across growth indicators and may remain limited in some areas.

Keywords

• Banking Sector
• Currency Protected Deposits
• T-Test
• Mann–Whitney U Test
• Difference-in-Differences (DiD)

KUR KORUMALI MEVDUAT POLİTİKASININ BANKACILIK SEKTÖRÜNÜN BÜYÜME PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: 2019-2024 DÖNEMİ ANALİZİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de Kur Korumalı Mevduat (KKM) politikasının bankacılık sektörünün büyüme performansı üzerindeki etkisinin analiz edilmesidir. Bu doğrultuda, KKM öncesi dönem (2019-2021) ile KKM sonrası dönem (2022-2024) kredi, aktif, mevduat, özkaynak, net faiz geliri, faiz dışı gelir ve net kâr büyüme oranları açısından karşılaştırılmıştır. Öncelikle, değişkenlerin dağılım özelliklerine göre parametrik (T-Testi) ve parametrik olmayan (Mann-Whitney U) testler uygulanmıştır. Bununla birlikte, politika etkisinin daha sağlam bir nedensellik çerçevesinde analiz edilebilmesi amacıyla Farkların-Farkı (Difference-in-Difference, DiD) yöntemi de kullanılmıştır. Gerçekleştirilen analizler sonucunda, klasik istatistiksel testler KKM sonrası dönemde kredi, mevduat, net kâr ve net faiz geliri büyüme oranlarında anlamlı artışlar olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bu sonuçlar, KKM uygulamasının bankaların fon toplama gücü, kredi verme kapasitesi ve kârlılığı üzerinde kısa vadeli pozitif etkiler yarattığını göstermektedir. Ancak DiD yöntemiyle yapılan regresyon analizleri, yalnızca mevduat ve özkaynak büyüme oranlarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif etki tespit etmiş; kredi, net kâr ve faiz gelirleri üzerindeki etkileri ise anlamlı bulunmamıştır. Bu durum, KKM uygulamasının etkilerinin büyüme göstergeleri arasında farklılaştığını ve bazı alanlarda sınırlı kalabildiğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

• Bankacılık Sektörü
• Kur Korumalı Mevduat
• T-Testi
• Mann-Whitney U Testi
• Difference-in-Differences (DiD)

References

1. Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Comparing financial systems. MIT Press.
2. Atanasov, V. & Black, B. (2016). Shock-based causal inference in corporate finance and accounting research. Critical Finance Review, 5(2), 207-304. https://doi.org/10.1561/104.00000036
3. Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (1999). Empirical strategies in labor economics. In O. C. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics, 3, 1277–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03004-7
4. Barth, J. R., Lin, C., Ma, Y., Seade, J., & Song, F. M. (2013). Do bank regulation, supervision and monitoring enhance or impede bank efficiency? Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), 2879-2892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.030
5. Bouchaud, J. P., & Potters, M. (2003). Theory of financial risk and derivative pricing: From statistical physics to risk management. Cambridge University Press.
6. Brown, M., & Huang, Y. (2021). Impacts of financial regulations on banking sectors' performance. Journal of Financial Stability, 50(3), 100-112.
7. Büyükoğlu, B. (2023). Effects of banking regulations on banking performance. Özgür Publications. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub47
8. Chen, Y., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.009

9. Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance, 1(2), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1088/1469-7688/1/2/304
10. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2001). Financial structures and economic growth: A cross-country comparison of banks, markets, and development. MIT Press.
11. Diamond, D. W., & Dybvig, P. H. (1983). Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 401-419.
12. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage publications.
13. Frost, J. (2020). Hypothesis Testing: An Intuitive Guide for Making Data-Driven Decisions. Statistics by Jim Publishing.
14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
15. Jayaratne, J., & Strahan, P. E. (1996). The finance-growth nexus: Evidence from Bank Branch Deregulation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 639-670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946668
16. Garcia, M., & Volkan, A. (2019). The impact of deposit insurance on financial stability in Latin American banks. Journal of Financial Stability, 45(2), 123-134.
17. Günal, M., & Deniz, F. (2024). Kur korumalı mevduat sistemi ve kur riskinin mevduatın krediye dönüşüm oranına etkisi: Türk bankacılık sektörü üzerine bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(4), 2659-2670. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2024.1939
18. Kartal, F. (2024). Kur korumalı mevduat sistemi ve sonuçları. İşletme Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 73-95. https://doi.org/10.33416/baybem.1411835
19. Khatun, N. (2021). Applications of normality test in statistical analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 11, 113-122. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2021.111006
20. Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 688-726.
21. Lilliefors, H. W. (1967). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 399-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916
22. Nachar, N. (2008). The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.1.p013
23. Noman, A. H. M., Gee, C. S., & Isa, C. R. (2018). Does bank regulation matter on the relationship between competition and financial stability? Evidence from Southeast Asian countries. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 48, 144-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.02.001
24. Özkan, S., Balsarı, Ç., & Varan, S. (2014). Effect of banking regulation on performance: Evidence from Turkey. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(4), 196-211. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X500412
25. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
26. Patel, S., & Kasman, B. (2020). Short-term liquidity effects of currency protection mechanisms in Asian banking sectors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 54(4), 204-219.
27. Rachev, S. T., Menn, C., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2005). Fat-tailed and skewed asset return distributions: Implications for risk management, portfolio selection, and option pricing. John Wiley & Sons.
28. Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21-33.
29. Roth, J., Sant’Anna, P. H. C., Bilinski, A., & Poe, J. (2023). What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 2218–2244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008
30. Schiozer, R. F., Mourad, F. A., & Martins, T. C. (2021). A tutorial on the use of differences-in-differences in management, finance, and accounting. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 25(1), e200067. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021200067
31. Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika, 52(3-4), 591-611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
32. Sullivan, M., & Wong, Y. (2022). Regulatory impacts on financial growth: Evidence from an international survey. Journal of Financial Regulation, 28(1), 112-134.
33. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
34. Tsay, R. S. (2010). Analysis of financial time series (Vol. 543). John Wiley & Sons. Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası (TCMB). (2021). Kur Korumalı Mevduat Ürünü Hakkında Bilgilendirme. Erişim tarihi:01.02.2025, https://www.tcmb.gov.tr
35. Vrbik, J. (2020). Deriving CDF of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistic. Applied Mathematics, 11, 227-246. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2020.113018
36. Wiley, B. J., & Navickas, J. (2021). Effect of financial regulation on performance of banking sector in the United States of America. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(3), 11–21. Retrieved from https://www.stratfordjournals.com/journals/index.php/journal-of-accounting/article/view/912
37. Yap, B. W., & Sim, C. H. (2011). Comparisons of various types of normality tests. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 81(12), 2141-2155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2010.520163