KADIN ÇALIŞANLARIN CİNSİYET ROL STRESİ ve İŞE ADANMIŞLIKLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE YAŞAM KALİTESİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

Abstract

Bu çalışmada kadın çalışanların cinsiyet rol stresi ve işe adanmışlıkları arasındaki ilişkide yaşam kalitesinin düzenleyici rolü sorgulanmıştır. Kadınların yaşamın farklı alanlarındaki rollerinin çakışmasından ortaya çıkan rol stresiyle ilgili bireysel batılı toplumlarda birçok çalışma yapılmış olmasına rağmen kolektivist Türk toplumunda herhangi bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Türk toplumunda kadınların  iş yaşamında daha fazla rol almasının rol stresine yol açabileceği ve bunun işe adanmışlıklarını olumsuz etkileyebileceği düşünülmektedir. Bu süreçte kadınların yaşam kalite algılarının yaşayabilecekleri stresi azaltarak işe adanmışlıklarını arttırabileceği düşünülmektedir. Batı Karadaniz illerindeki kadın çalışanların oluşturduğu 306 kişilik örneklemden elde edilen veriler SPSS 21 programına entegre olarak kullanılan Process 3.0 makrosuyla analiz edilmiştir. 

Keywords

• Rol Stresi,İşe Adanmışlık,Yaşam Kalite Algısı

MODERATION ROLE OF FEMALE EMPLOYEES’ QUALITY OF LIFE PERCEPTIONS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER ROLE STRESS AND WORK ENGAGEMENT

Abstract

Moderation role of female employee’s quality of life perceptions on the relationship between gender role stress and engagement is questioned in this research. Although there are a lot of studyings about gender role stress which is the result of role conflict between different areas of life in individualistic western cultures,  no research is found in collectivist Turkish culture.  It is thought that the prevalence of women in business life might lead gender rol stress and this process might decrease the level of work engagement. But quality of life perceptions may decrease the effect of gender role stress in this relationship.Datas gathered from female employees in Western Blacksea cities were analyzed with Process 3.0  which is used with SPSS 21.

Keywords

• Role Stress,Work Engagement,Quality of Life Perception

References

1. Afşar, S.T. (2014). Impact of Quality of Work-life on Organizational Commitment. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4), 124-152.
2. Alparslan, A. M., Bozkurt, Ö.Ç. ve Özgöz, A. (2015). İşletmelerde Cinsiyet Ayrımcılığı ve Kadın Çalışanların Sorunları. MAKÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(3), 66-81.
3. Bates, S. (2004). Getting Engaged, HR Magazine, 49(2), 44-51.
4. Bell, B.T., Lawton, R. ve Dittmar, H. (2007). The impact of thin models in music videos on adolescent girls’ body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 4, 137-145.
5. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
6. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing, Psychological Review, 88, 354-364.
7. Bem, S. L. (1984). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In Sonderegger, T. B. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Psychology and gender. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
8. Bognar (2005). The Concept of Quality of Life, Social Theory & Practice, 31(4), 561–580.

9. Boudet, A.M., Pettesch, P. ve Turk, C., with Thumala, A. (2012). On Norms And Agency. Conversations with Women and Men about Gender Equality in 20 Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank. (http://bit.ly/1jGGobQ, 12 Nisan 2017 tarihinde erişildi).
10. Brummelhuis, L.L.T., Bakker, A.B., Hetland, J. ve Keulemans, L. (2012). Do new ways of working foster work engagement ?. Psicothema, 24, 113–120.
11. Cogin, J. A. ve Fish, A. (2007). Gender, Work Engagement and Sexual Harassment: An Emprical Investigation, Anzam Conference Paper, 2007. (http://www.anzam.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf- Manager/1803_046.PDF, 02 Mart 2017 tarihinde erişildi).
12. Constanza, R. (2007). Quality of Life: An Approach Integrating Opportunities, Human Needs, and Subjective Well-Being. Ecological Economics, 61, 267–276.
13. Coyle, E. F., Van Leer, E., Fulcher, M. ve Schroeder, K. (2015). Assessing Emerging Adults’ Anticipated Work-Family Conflict and Coping Strategies, Sex Roles.
14. Cummins, R.A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J. ve Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national ndex of subjective wellbeing: the Australian Unity Wellbeing index, Social Indicators Research 64, 159–190.
15. Curtin, N., Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A. and Caruthers, A. (2011). Femininity ideology and sexual health in young women: A focus on sexual knowledge, embodiment, and agency. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23(1), 48-62.
16. Dudte, K. (2008). Social Influence and Gender Norms. Ohio State University, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, 2008.
17. Efthim, P. W., Kenny, M. E. ve Mahalık J. R. (2001). Gender Role Stres in Relation to Shame, Guilt, and Externalization. Journal of Counselling & Development, 79, 430-438.
18. Elprana, G., Felfe, J., Stiehl, S. ve Gatzka, M. (2015). Exploring the Sex Difference in Affective Motivation to Lead Furthering the Understanding of Women’s Underrepresentation in Leadership Positions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14(3),142–152.
19. Eren, E. (2015). Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
20. EUC (2017). Report on Equality between Women and Men in the EU. European Commission Report. Belgium.
21. Gillespie, B.L. ve Eisler, R.M. (1992). Development of the Feminine Gender Role Stress Scale: A cognitive-behavioral measure of stress, appraisal, and coping for women. Behavior Modification, 16, 426-438.
22. Googasian, M. E. (2007). Role Model Effects on Health Communication Practices, Indian University, Unpublished Master Thesis, 2007.
23. Haas, B.K. (1999). A multidisciplinary concept analysis of quality of life, Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21, 728–742.
24. Hakim, C. (2000). Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Hayes, A. F. (2013). An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26. Hayes, J. A. ve Mahalik, J. R. (2000). Gender role conflict and psychological distress in male counseling clients. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 1, 116–125.
27. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. ve Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The Motivation to work. New York: Wiley.
28. Hines, M., Brook, C. ve Conway, G. (2004). Androgen and psychosexual development. The Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 75-81.
29. Jahoda, G. (2002). Culture, biology and development. In Keller, H., Portinga, Y.H. and Schölmerich, A. (Eds.), Between Culture and Biology (pp.13-29). United Kingdom; Cambridge Press.
30. Kahn, R.L. ve Quinn, R.P. (1970). Role stress: A framework for analysis. In McLean, A. (Ed), Occupational mental health. New York NY:Rand-McNally.
31. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 692-724.
32. Kanungo, R. N. ve Hartwick, J. (1987). An alternative to theintrinsic-extrinsic dichotomoy of work rewards. Journal of Management, 13, 751-766.
33. Karatepe, O.M. (2012). Job resources,work engagement, and hotel employee outcomes: a time-lagged analysis. Economic Research, 25, 1127–1140.
34. Liu, W. M., Rochlen, A. ve Mohr, J. J. (2005). Real and ideal gender-role conflict: Exploring psychological distress among men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6(2), 137-148.
35. Luthans, F. ve Peterson, S.J. (2002). Employee Engagement and Manager Self-Efficacy, Journal of Management Development, 21 (5), 376-387.
36. Mahalik, J. R. vd. (2005). Development of the conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory, Sex Roles, 52, 417-435.
37. May, D.R., Gilson, R.L. ve Hartner, L.M. (2004). The Psychological Conditions of Meaningful, Safety, and Availability and Engagement of the Human Spirit at Work, Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 77, 11-37.
38. O’Neil, J. M. (1981). Patterns of gender role conflict and strain: Sexism and fear of femininity in men’s lives. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 60, 203–210.
39. O’Neil, J. M. ve Denke, R. (2016). An empirical review of gender role conflict research: New conceptual models and research paradigms. In Wong, Y. J., Wester, S. R., Wong, Y. J., and Wester, S. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of men and masculinities (pp. 51-79). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
40. Paustian-Underdahl, S.C., Walker, L.S. ve Woehr, D.J. (2014). Gender and Perceptions of Leadership Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis of Contextual Moderators, Journal of Applied Psychology , 99(6), 1129–1145.
41. Rees, C., Alfes, K. ve Gatenby, M. (2013). Employee voice and engagement: connections and consequences, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2780–2798.
42. Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A. ve Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617-635.
43. Richmond, K., Levant, R., Smalley, B. ve Cook, S. (2015). The Femininity Ideology Scale (FIS): dimensions and its relationship to anxiety and feminine gender role stress. Women & Health, 55(3), 263-279.
44. Rothbard, N.P. (2001). Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family Roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655-84.
45. Rothstein, B. ve Tannenberg, M. (2015). The Quality of Government and Development Policy, The Quality of Government Institute Report, 2015. (http://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1549/1549815_the-quality-of-government-and-development-policy.pdf, 15 Mayıs 2017 tarihinde erişildi).
46. Schalock, R. L. ve Keith, K.D. (Eds.) (2016). Cross-Cultural Quality of Life: Enhancing the Lives of People with Intellectual Disability (2nd Ed). American Assoc. on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
47. Schalock, R.L., Brown, I., Brown, R., Cummins, R.A., Felce, D. ve Matikka, L. (2002). Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: report of an international panel of experts, Ment Retard., 40(6), 457–70.
48. Schaufeli, W. B. ve Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.
49. Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A. ve Salanova, M. (2004). The Measurement of Work Engagement with a short questionnaire; A Cross- National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66 (4), 701-716.
50. Schaufeli, W. B. ve Salanova, M. (2006). Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In Gilliland, S. W., Steiner, D. D., and Skarlicki, D. P. (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (Vol. 5): Managing social and ethical issues in organizations. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
51. Schwarz, N. ve Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 61–84). Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
52. Seidlitz, L. ve Diener, E. (1993). Memory for positive versus negative life events: Theories for the differences between happy and unhappy persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 654–664.
53. Sirgy, J. (2011). Theoretical perspectives guiding QOL indicator projects, Social Indicators Research, 103, 1-22.
54. Spence, J. T. ve Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
55. Thomas, K. W. (2009). Intrinsic Motivation at Work (2nd Ed.). San Fransisco: Berrett-Koehler Pub.
56. Thomas, K. W. ve Tymon, W. G. (2009). Work Engagement Profile Interpretive Report. Joe Trainer XYZ, Ltd. (http://www.cppasiapacific.com/content /Sample%20Reports/ 248520.pdf, 14 Haziran 2017 tarihinde erişildi).
57. Wallace, C., Pichler, F. ve Hayes, B.C. (2007). First European Quality of Life Survey. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Loughlinstown,Dublin.
58. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. ve Schaufeli, W.B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235–244.
59. Zapf, W. (2000). Social Reporting in the 1970s and 1990s. Social Indicators Research, 51, 1-15.