Cousins, J. B., Elliott, C., Amo, C., Bourgeois, I., Chouinard, J. A., Goh, S. C., Lahey, R. (2008). Organizational capacity to do and use evaluation: Results of a pan-Canadian survey of evaluators. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 23(3), 1-35.
Kusek, Jody Zall (2011). Assessing Country Readiness for Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation to Support Results Informed Budgeting. Global Expert Team (GET) Brief. World Bank, Washington, DC. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/10456 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Morariu, J., E. Reed and K. Brennan (2012). Readiness for Evaluation and Learning. Assessing Grant maker and Grantee Capacity. Innovation Network.
Preskill, H. and Torres, R.T. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks. CA.
Rugh, J., and Segone, M., editors (2013). Voluntary Organizations for Professional Evaluation (VOPEs): Learning from Africa, Americas, Asia, Australasia, Europe and Middle East. EvalPartners, UNICEF, IOCE.
Segone, M. and Ocampo, A. (2006). IOCE (International Organization for Cooperation in Evaluation). Creating and developing evaluation organizations. Lessons learned from Africa, Americas, Asia, Australasia and Europe, Peru
Tarsilla, M. (2012). From building evaluation capacity to supporting evaluation capacity development: The cases of Democratic Republic of Congo, Niger and South Africa. PhD Dissertation. Western Michigan University.
United Nations Evaluation Group (2016, 2017). Norms and standards for evaluation. New York: UNEG.
TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA
In designing Evaluation Capacity Building (ECB) programs in a country, it is vital to know the baseline situation. A necessary step is to reveal the status of current understanding and practices of evaluation. The objective of the paper is to explore the evaluation readiness of organizations in Turkey. Following the literature on organizational culture on evaluative inquiry, the study reports on the development and administration of a structured questionnaire with particular focus on various dimensions of organizational readiness for evaluation such as culture, leadership, resources and existing evaluation practices, if any. The survey sample includes 71 representatives of government agencies and, domestic and international NGOs in Turkey. Although evaluation is regarded and perceived as a tool for organizational learning and improved organizational performance, the culture, leadership and structure of the organizations do not show supporting characteristics on the implementation and use of evaluation in organizations. The results reveal a necessity of positioning evaluation as a major tool for efficient use of resources and organizational learning in Turkish organizations.
Cousins, J. B., Elliott, C., Amo, C., Bourgeois, I., Chouinard, J. A., Goh, S. C., Lahey, R. (2008). Organizational capacity to do and use evaluation: Results of a pan-Canadian survey of evaluators. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 23(3), 1-35.
Kusek, Jody Zall (2011). Assessing Country Readiness for Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation to Support Results Informed Budgeting. Global Expert Team (GET) Brief. World Bank, Washington, DC. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/10456 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Morariu, J., E. Reed and K. Brennan (2012). Readiness for Evaluation and Learning. Assessing Grant maker and Grantee Capacity. Innovation Network.
Preskill, H. and Torres, R.T. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks. CA.
Rugh, J., and Segone, M., editors (2013). Voluntary Organizations for Professional Evaluation (VOPEs): Learning from Africa, Americas, Asia, Australasia, Europe and Middle East. EvalPartners, UNICEF, IOCE.
Segone, M. and Ocampo, A. (2006). IOCE (International Organization for Cooperation in Evaluation). Creating and developing evaluation organizations. Lessons learned from Africa, Americas, Asia, Australasia and Europe, Peru
Tarsilla, M. (2012). From building evaluation capacity to supporting evaluation capacity development: The cases of Democratic Republic of Congo, Niger and South Africa. PhD Dissertation. Western Michigan University.
United Nations Evaluation Group (2016, 2017). Norms and standards for evaluation. New York: UNEG.
Akgüngör, S., Gülcan, Y., & Kuştepeli, Y. (2021). TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.839771
AMA
Akgüngör S, Gülcan Y, Kuştepeli Y. TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. January 2021;21(2):275-286. doi:10.24889/ifede.839771
Chicago
Akgüngör, Sedef, Yaprak Gülcan, and Yeşim Kuştepeli. “TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 21, no. 2 (January 2021): 275-86. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.839771.
EndNote
Akgüngör S, Gülcan Y, Kuştepeli Y (January 1, 2021) TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 21 2 275–286.
IEEE
S. Akgüngör, Y. Gülcan, and Y. Kuştepeli, “TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 275–286, 2021, doi: 10.24889/ifede.839771.
ISNAD
Akgüngör, Sedef et al. “TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 21/2 (January 2021), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.839771.
JAMA
Akgüngör S, Gülcan Y, Kuştepeli Y. TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;21:275–286.
MLA
Akgüngör, Sedef et al. “TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 21, no. 2, 2021, pp. 275-86, doi:10.24889/ifede.839771.
Vancouver
Akgüngör S, Gülcan Y, Kuştepeli Y. TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;21(2):275-86.