İdiyopatik Adölesan Skolyozda Schroth Egzersiz Yöntemi ile Kombine (Manuel Terapi+ Schroth Egzersiz Yöntemi) Yöntemin Etkinliğinin Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada tek başına Schroth egzersiz yöntemine karşı Schroth egzersiz yöntemi ve manuel terapi kombinasyonunun adölesan idiyopatik skolyoz hastaları üzerindeki etkisinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Yöntem: 11-18 yaş arası katılımcılar iki gruba ayrılmıştır: bir grup Schroth egzersizlerini uygularken diğeri bu egzersizleri manuel terapi ile birleştirmiştir. Başlangıçta ve 3 aylık tedavi periyodunun ardından gibozite, statik ve dinamik denge, görsel algı ve yaşam kalitesi ölçüldü.

Bulgular: Sonuçlar cinsiyet dağılımı, yaş, boy, kilo, vücut kitle indeksi, statik ve dinamik denge, gibozite ve yaşam kalitesi açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığını (p>0,05) ancak görsel algı açısından kombine terapi grubunun daha iyi sonuçlar gösterdiğini ortaya koydu (p<0,05). Kombine terapi grubunda gibozite, yaşam kalitesi ve statik dengede iyileşme gözlenmesine rağmen, bu farklılıklar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi (p>0.05).

Sonuç: Bu çalışma kombine tedavi grubunun, görsel algıda iyileşme dışında adölesan idiyopatik skolyoz tedavisinde tek başına Schroth egzersiz yöntemine göre anlamlı bir avantaj sağlamadığı sonucuna varmıştır.

Keywords

• Skolyoz
• schroth
• manuel terapi

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Schroth Exercise Method and Combined (Manual Therapy + Schroth Exercise Method) Method in Idiopathic Adolescent Scoliosis

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact of the Schroth exercise method alone versus a combination of the Schroth exercise method and manual therapy on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Method: Participants aged 11-18 were divided into two groups: one practicing Schroth exercises and the other combining these exercises with manual therapy. Gibbosity, static and dynamic balance, visual perception, and quality of life were measured at baseline and after 3-month intervention period.

Results: Results indicated no significant differences between the groups in gender distribution, age, height, weight, body mass index, static and dynamic balance, gibbosity, and quality of life (p>0.05), except for visual perception, where the combined therapy group showed better results (p<0.05). Despite some observed benefits in gibbosity, quality of life, and static balance in the combined therapy group, these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The study concludes that, except for improved visual perception in the combined therapy group, there were no significant advantages over the Schroth exercise method alone in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Keywords

• Scoliosis
• schroth
• manual therapy

References

1. 1. Hakkert AM. Hippocrates: On Nature of Bones. In: Littre PE, editor. Oeuvres Completes d'Hippocrate. Amsterdam; 1982.
2. 2. Sanders JO, Browne RH, McConnell SJ, Margraf SA, Cooney TE, Finegold DN. Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(1):64–73.
3. 3. Bilgiç S, Erşen Ö. Adolesan idiyopatik skolyoz konservatif tedavisi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Orthop Traumatol-Special Topics. 2017;10(2):118–123.
4. 4. Lowe TG, Edgar M, Margulies JY, Miller NH, Raso VJ, Reinker KA, et al. Etiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current trends in research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(8):1157–1168.
5. 5. Karanki İ. Body image and self-esteem levels in girls adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and their effects on quality of life and compliance to treatment [master’s thesis]. Istanbul: Halic University, Institute of Health Sciences; 2016.
6. 6. Gür G. Investigation of the effect of spinal stabilization training and body awareness training on subjective vertical perception and body symmetry in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [doctoral thesis]. Ankara: Hacettepe University, Institute of Health Sciences; 2015.
7. 7. Haumont T, Gauchard GC, Lascombes P, Perrin PP. Postural instability in early-stage idiopathic scoliosis in adolescent girls. Spine. 2011;36(13): E847–E854.
8. 8. Massion J. Postural control system. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998;8(6):746–751.

9. 9. Lion A, Gauchard GC, Barrault D, Perrin PP. Differentiated postural control strategies in young and elderly subjects suffering from severe visual impairment. Age. 2013;35(3):717–726.
10. 10. Sahlstrand T, Örtengren R, Nachemson A. Postural equilibrium in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1978;49(4):354–365.
11. 11. Bisdorff A, Anastasopoulos D, Bronstein A, Gresty M. Subjective postural vertical in peripheral and central vestibular disorders. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1995;(520):68–71.
12. 12. Korovessis P, Kyrkos C, Piperos G, Soucacos PN. Effects of thoracolumbosacral orthosis on spinal deformities, trunk asymmetry, and frontal lower rib cage in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2000;25(16):2064–2071.
13. 13. Dixit S, Agarwal G, Singh J, Kant S, Singh JV. A study on consciousness of adolescent girls about their body image. Indian J Community Med. 2011;36(3):197–202.
14. 14. Pineda S, Bago J, Gilperez C, Climent JM. The Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale: a valid and reliable tool for evaluating adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(2):202–206.
15. 15. Bago J, Sanchez-Raya J, Perez-Grueso FJ, Climent JM. The Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS): a new tool to evaluate subjective impression of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2010; 5:6.
16. 16. Savaş S. Scoliosis and treatment methods. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2003;13(2):105–112.
17. 17. Park JH, Jeon HS, Park HW. Effects of the Schroth exercise on idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(3):593–602.
18. 18. Lehnert-Schroth C. Three-Dimensional Treatment for Scoliosis: A Physiotherapeutic Method for Deformities of the Spine. Palo Alto (CA): Martindale Press; 1992.
19. 19. Çolak TK, Akgül T, Budak FA, Uzel M, Çetin E, Erşen Ö. The impact of Schroth exercises on postural control in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: an experimental study. Spine J. 2020;20(2):216–223.
20. 20. Franko OI, Bray C, Newton PO. Validation of a scoliometer smartphone app to assess scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(8): e72–e75.
21. 21. Panta KP. The reliability of the Standing Stork Test for assessing static balance: a comparison study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(4):1239–1242.
22. 22. Bahar Z. Dynamic balance performance and non-dominant leg advantage in elite athletes. Percept Mot Skills. 2019;126(5):873–885.
23. 23. Engquist KD, Smith CA, Chimera NJ, Warren M. Performance comparison on the Y-Balance Test between high school and collegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(11):3173–3179.
24. 24. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, Acaroglu E, Yazici M, Akcali O, et al. Reliability and validity of the adapted Turkish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine. 2005;30(21):2464–2468.
25. 25. Reichel D, Schanz J. Developmental psychological aspects of scoliosis treatment. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6(3–4):221–225.
26. 26. Assaiante C, Mallau S, Jouve JL, Bollini G, Vaugoyeau M. Do adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) neglect proprioceptive information in sensory integration of postural control? PLoS One. 2012;7(7): e40646.
27. 27. Chen KC, Chiu EH. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by spinal manipulation: a case study. J Altern Complement Med. 2008;14(6):749–751.
28. 28. Tam EMS, Liu Z, Lam TP, et al. Lower muscle mass and body fat in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are associated with abnormal leptin bioavailability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(11):940–946.
29. 29. Tekgül N, Dirik N, Karademirci E, Doğan A. Adolesanlarda vücut kitle indeksi ile ilişkili değişkenlerin incelenmesi. Ege Tıp Dergisi. 2012;51(3):183–186.