Do Pregnant Women Want their Partners and Families with them at Birth?

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to determine the person pregnant women want to be with during labor, the stage of labor at which this support is desired, how women evaluate the support provided after birth, and to identify the factors influencing these outcomes.
Method: The study included 381 pregnant women who applied to the maternity ward of Erzurum City Hospital. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire form containing sociodemographic characteristics and information about the birth process and analyzed using IBM SPSS 25.
Results: 72.7% of the participants live in nuclear families, and 81.9% are unemployed. 88.6% of the pregnant women received prenatal care, and the rates of positive birth experiences were higher in this group. Spousal support during childbirth was limited (82.4% gave birth without a spouse), but family support also influenced the positive perception of the birth experience. The rate of pregnant women who wanted their partner present during childbirth was 59.3%, and the rate of those who wanted a family member present was 73.2%. The most important factor influencing the decision to have a partner (37.5%) or a family member (50.1%) present was the desire for support. 
Conclusion: The study shows that prenatal care and spousal and family support have significant effects on positive birth experiences. As the level of education increases, the rate of participation in childbirth preparation classes increases. Pregnant women prefer to have their spouses or a family member present during labor and delivery.

Keywords

• Family supports
• midwifery
• pregnancy
• spouses

Gebeler Doğumda Eşlerini, Ailelerini Yanında İstiyor Mu?

Abstract

Amaç: Bu araştırma, gebelerin doğum eylemi sırasında yanlarında bulunmasını istedikleri kişiyi belirlemeyi, bu desteğin doğumun hangi aşamasında istenildiğini, doğum sonrası sağlanan desteğin kadınlar tarafından nasıl değerlendirildiğini incelemeyi ve etkileyen faktörleri belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır.
Yöntem: Araştırma, Erzurum Şehir Hastanesi doğumhane birimine başvuran 381 gebe kadını kapsamaktadır. Veriler, sosyodemografik özellikler ve doğum süreçleriyle ilgili bilgileri içeren bir anket formu aracılığıyla yüz yüze görüşmelerle toplanmış ve IBM SPSS 25 kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Katılımcıların %72,7’si çekirdek ailede yaşamaktadır ve %81,9’u çalışmamaktadır. Gebelerin %88,6’sı doğum öncesi bakım almış olup, bu gruptaki olumlu doğum deneyimi oranları daha yüksektir. Doğum sırasında eş desteği sınırlı kalmış (%82,4’ü eşsiz doğum yapmıştır), ancak aile desteği doğum deneyimini olumlu algılama da etkili olmuştur. Gebelerin doğum anında eşlerini yanlarında isteme oranı %59,3, aileden birini yanlarında isteme oranı ise %73,2 olarak belirlenmiştir. Gebelerin eşlerini (%37,5) veya aileden birini (%50,1) yanında istemesinde de en önemli etkenin destek alma isteği olduğu belirlenmiştir. 
Sonuç: Araştırma, doğum öncesi bakım alma ve eş ve aile desteğinin olumlu doğum deneyimi üzerinde belirgin etkileri olduğunu göstermektedir. Eğitim seviyesi arttıkça, doğuma hazırlık eğitimlerine katılma oranı artmaktadır. Gebeler doğum sürecinde ve doğum anında eşlerinin veya aileden birinin yanlarında olmasını tercih etmektedir.

Keywords

• Aile desteği
• ebe
• eş desteği
• gebelik

References

1. 1. Sapkota S, Kobayashi T, Kakehashi M, Baral G, Yoshida I. In the Nepalese context, can a husband's attendance during childbirth help his wife feel more in control of labour? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-49.
2. 2. Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D. Women's experiences of labour and birth: An evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery. 2009;25(2):e49–e59.
3. 3. Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(10):CD003766.
4. 4. Afulani P, Kusi C, Kirumbi L, Walker D. Companionship during facility-based childbirth: Results from a mixed-methods study with recently delivered women and providers in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:150. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1806-1.
5. 5. Munkhondya BM, Munkhondya TE, Chirwa E, Wang H. Efficacy of companion-integrated childbirth preparation for childbirth fear, self-efficacy, and maternal support in primigravid women in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:36.
6. 6. Wanyenze EW, Byamugisha JK, Tumwesigye NM, Muwanguzi PA, Nalwadda GK. A qualitative exploratory interview study on birth companion support actions for women during childbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):63.
7. 7. Iravani M, Zarean E, Janghorbani M, Bahrami M. Women's needs and expectations during normal labor and delivery. J Educ Health Promot. 2015;4:6.
8. 8. Dunne CL, Fraser J, Gardner GE. Women's perceptions of social support during labour: Development, reliability and validity of the Birth Companion Support Questionnaire. Midwifery. 2014;30(7):847–852. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.010.

9. 9. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on health promotion interventions for maternal and newborn health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
10. 10. Timur Taşhan S, Duru Y. Views on spousal support during delivery: A Turkey experience. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:245. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1779-0.
11. 11. Banda G, Kafulafula G, Nyirenda E, Taulo F, Kalilani L. Acceptability and experience of supportive companionship during childbirth in Malawi. BJOG. 2010;117(8):937–945.
12. 12. Montagu D, Sudhinaraset M, Diamond-Smith N, et al. Where women go to deliver: Understanding the changing landscape of childbirth in Africa and Asia. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(8):1146–1152. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx060.
13. 13. Bohren MA, Berger BO, Munthe-Kaas H, Tunçalp Ö. Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3:CD012449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012449.pub2.
14. 14. Kabakian-Khasholian T, Portela A. Companion of choice at birth: Factors affecting implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:265.
15. 15. Adeyemi AB, Fatusi AO, Phillips AS, Olajide FO, Awowole IO, Orisawayi AO. Factors associated with the desire for companionship during labor in a Nigerian community. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;141(3):360–365. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12471.
16. 16. Mwakyusa MO, Said A, Selemani S, et al. "If my husband was in the labor ward with me, my baby wouldn't have died": Experiences on birth companionship from a tertiary health facility, Tanzania. PLoS One. 2025;20(1):e0309602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309602.
17. 17. Zamani P, Ziaie T, Lakeh NM, Leili EK. The correlation between perceived social support and childbirth experience in pregnant women. Midwifery. 2019;75:146–151.
18. 18. Demir R. Kadınların doğumda sosyal destek tercihleri ve deneyimleri: Nitel bir çalışma. Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023;12(1):201–210.
19. 19. Dellmann T. "The best moment of my life": A literature review of fathers' experience of childbirth. Aust Midwifery. 2004;17(3):20–26. doi: 10.1016/S1448-8272(04)80014-2.
20. 20. Mehran N, Hajian S, Simbar M, Alavi Majd H. Spouse's participation in perinatal care: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:373.
21. 21. Lazoğlu M, Apay SE. Obstetride aile merkezli bakım. Ebelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;2(2):71–75.
22. 22. Hawkins M, Misra D, Zhang L, Price M, Dailey R, Giurgescu C. Family involvement in pregnancy and psychological health among pregnant Black women. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2021;35(1):42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2020.09.012.
23. 23. Kashaija DK, Mselle LT, Mkoka DA. Husbands' experience and perception of supporting their wives during childbirth in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:573.
24. 24. Beyene Getahun K, Ukke GG, Alemu BW. Utilization of companionship during delivery and associated factors among women who gave birth at Arba Minch town public health facilities, southern Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240239.
25. 25. Saeieh SE, Rahimzadeh M, Yazdkhasti M, Torkashvand S. Perceived social support and maternal competence in primipara women during pregnancy and after childbirth. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2017;5(4):408.
26. 26. Tani F, Castagna V. Maternal social support, quality of birth experience, and post-partum depression in primiparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(6):689–692.
27. 27. Mete S, Çiçek Ö. Doğum desteği: Yeniden önem kazanmaya başlayan bir uygulama. Bezmialem Sci. 2018;6:138–142. doi: 10.14235/bs.2017.1635.
28. 28. Chaote P, Mwakatundu N, Dominico S, et al. Birth companionship in a government health system: A pilot study in Kigoma, Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:135.
29. 29. Redshaw M, Henderson J. Fathers' engagement in pregnancy and childbirth: Evidence from a national survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:70.
30. 30. Lisnawati L, Sumiaty S, Fadliah U. Husband support and the activity of health officers to antenatal care (ANC) visits of pregnant women. Urban Health. 2019;2(1).