Research Article

Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey

Volume: 4 Number: 2 October 31, 2017
EN TR

Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey

Abstract

Participation banks are different from conventionel banks in that their working principles are complementary to the financial system and operate in the same competitive environment as conventionel banks. From this point of view, the finacial performance of the participation banks will be more or less different depending on the conventionel banks, and they will provide clues about the future growth performance of these banks. In this study, financial performance of 3 participation banks including Turkiye Finans, Albaraka Turk and Kuveyt Turk and three conventionel banks of similar size (Şeker Bank, Turk Ekonomi Bankasi and ING Bank) were compared using 2010-2016 financial data. In comparison, a total of 11 ratios were used in profitability, liquidity, risk and solvency, asset quality and capital adequacy. 

Keywords

References

  1. AKÇAN, Ahmet, Özel Finans Kurumlarının Türk Finans Sektöründeki Konumu ve Geleceği, Malatya: İnönü Üniversitesi SBE, 1997, (Doktora Tezi)
  2. AKIN, Cihangir, Faizsiz bankacılık ve kalkınma, Kayıhan Yayınları, İstanbul, 1986.
  3. AKTEPE, İhsan Emin, Sorularla katılım bankacılığı, Türkiye Katılım Bankaları Birliği, İstanbul, 2013
  4. AKYÜZ, Yılmaz, Katılım bankalarının net kar performansına etki eden faktörlerin çoklu doğrusal regresyon yöntemi ile analizi. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar. 50 (584), 2013, ss. 81-92.
  5. ARAS, Osman Nuri, Mustafa ÖZTÜRK, Reel ekonomiye katkıları bakımından katılım bankalarının kullandırdığı fonların analizi. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 3 (2), 2011, ss. 167-179.
  6. AYRIÇAY, Yücel, Mahmut YARDIMCIOĞLU, Bircan DEMİR, Mevduat ve katılım bankalarının finansal performanslarının karşılaştırılması. KSÜ İİBF Dergisi. 4 (2), 2014.
  7. BAĞCI, Haşim, Ticari bankalar ile katılım bankalarının kârlılık performanslarının topsis yöntemi ile karşılaştırılması, İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi SBE, 2013, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi.)
  8. BAYINDIR, Servet, Katılım bankacılığı için yeni bir ürün olarak mal(emtia) vadeli işlem sözleşmeleri ve fıkhi açıdan incelenmesi, Finansal yenilik ve açılımları ile katılım bankacılığı, Aydın Yabanlı (Ed.). İstanbul: Türkiye Katılım Bankaları Birliği, 2012, ss. 155-200.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mustafa Yurttadur
İSTANBUL GELİŞİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Hayati Demirbaş This is me
Türkiye Finans Katılım Bankası
Türkiye

Publication Date

October 31, 2017

Submission Date

July 7, 2017

Acceptance Date

July 18, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 4 Number: 2

APA
Yurttadur, M., & Demirbaş, H. (2017). Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 89-117. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.326621
AMA
1.Yurttadur M, Demirbaş H. Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey. IGUJSS. 2017;4(2):89-117. doi:10.17336/igusbd.326621
Chicago
Yurttadur, Mustafa, and Hayati Demirbaş. 2017. “Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey”. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Social Sciences 4 (2): 89-117. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.326621.
EndNote
Yurttadur M, Demirbaş H (October 1, 2017) Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Social Sciences 4 2 89–117.
IEEE
[1]M. Yurttadur and H. Demirbaş, “Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey”, IGUJSS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 89–117, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.17336/igusbd.326621.
ISNAD
Yurttadur, Mustafa - Demirbaş, Hayati. “Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey”. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Social Sciences 4/2 (October 1, 2017): 89-117. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.326621.
JAMA
1.Yurttadur M, Demirbaş H. Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey. IGUJSS. 2017;4:89–117.
MLA
Yurttadur, Mustafa, and Hayati Demirbaş. “Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey”. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, Oct. 2017, pp. 89-117, doi:10.17336/igusbd.326621.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Yurttadur, Hayati Demirbaş. Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey. IGUJSS. 2017 Oct. 1;4(2):89-117. doi:10.17336/igusbd.326621

Cited By

 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)