Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Organizational Commitment Relationship: A Meta Analysis on Researches Conducted in Turkey

Year 2014, , 3 - 20, 11.11.2014

Sait Gürbüz , Özgür Ayhan , Mahmut Sert

https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.22845

Cited By: 38

Abstract

Recently, one of the significant antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviour to which researcher show attention, has been organizational commitment The purpose of this study was identify the total value of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviour and organizational commitment by using meta-analytic method in Turkish sample. For this reason, a total of 31 individual (primary) studies that have used Turkish sample in both Turkish and English organizational behaviour literature, were analyzed by using psychometric meta-analysis method suggested by Hunter and Schmidt (2004). Results based on 31 independent samples (N=8708) indicated a moderately strong, positive relationship (r= .36) between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behaviour. The theoretical and practical contributions of these findings were discussed, and directions for future research were identified.

Keywords

Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Organizational Commitment, Psychometric Meta-Analysis

Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ve Örgütsel Bağlılık İlişkisi: Türkiye’de Yapılan Araştırmalar Üzerinden Bir Meta Analizi

Abstract

Son yıllarda araştırmacılar tarafından yoğun ilgi gösterilen örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının en önemli öncüllerinden birisi de örgütsel bağlılıktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı; Türkiye örnekleminde, örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen bireysel araştırmaların toplam değerini meta analizi yöntemini kullanarak tespit etmektir. Bu amaçla, Türkçe ve İngilizce yazında Türkiye örnekleminde yapılmış 31 adet müstakil görgül araştırma, Hunter ve Schmidt’in (2004) “Psikometrik Meta Analiz” yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Meta analizlere dâhil edilen 31 bağımsız örneklemden (N=8708) elde edilen sonuçlar değerlendirildiğinde, örgütsel bağlılık ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı (genel boyutları itibarıyla) arasında orta düzeyde olumlu yönde ilişki (r= .36) olduğu görülmüştür. Bu araştırma sonuçlarının teori ve uygulamaya olan katkıları tartışılmış, ileride yapılacak araştırmalar için öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı, Örgütsel Bağlılık, Psikometrik Meta Analiz

References

• Acar, A. Z. (2006). Örgütsel yurttaşlık davranışı: Kavramsal gelişimi ile kişisel ve örgütsel etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(1), 1-14.
• Allen, N. J. & Meyer J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
• Alotaibi, A. G. (2001). Antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior: A study of public personnel in Kuwait. Public Personnel Management, 30(3), 363-376.
• Aslan, Ş. (2008). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile örgütsel bağlılık ve mesleğe bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin araştırılması. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 15(2), 163-178.
• Barnard, C. I. (1968). The Functions of the Executive (2.Baskı), Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
• Bateman, T. S. & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
• Becker, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making?. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 232–244.
• Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. The American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-40.
• Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., & Gilbert, N. L. (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 464-482.
• Bogler, R. & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277-289.
• Borenstein, M., L., Hedges, V., Higgins, J.P.T., & Rothstein, H.R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. UK: John Wiley and Sons.
• Bolat, O. İ. & Bolat, T. (2008). Otel işletmelerinde örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ilişkisi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(19), 75-94.
• Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criteriondomain to include elements of contextual performance. İçinde N. Schmitt ve W. C. Borman (Ed.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 71-98), San Francisco.
• Card, N.A. (2012). Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Chan, D.K-S., Lam, C.B., Chow, S.Y., & Cheung, S.F. (2008). Examining the job-related, psychological and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 362-376.
• Chen, Z. X. & Francesco, A.M. (2003). The relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(3), 490-510.
• Cichy, R. F., Cha, J., & Kim, S. (2009). The relationship between organizational commitment and contextual performance among private club leaders. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28, 53-62.
• Chu, C., Lee, H. & HSU, H.M. (2006). The impact of social support and job stress on public health nurses’ organizational citizenship behaviors in rural Taiwan. Public Health Nursing, 23(6), 496-505.
• Cohen, A. & Danny, K. (2008). Individual values and social exchange variables examining their relationship to and mutual effect on in-role performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Group and Organization Management, 33(4), 425-452.
• Coleman, D. F., Irving, G. P., & Cooper, C. L. (1999). Another look at the locus of control–organizational commitment relationship: It depends on the form of commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 995-1001.
• Çetin, F. (2011). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarının açıklanmasında örgütsel bağlılık, iş tatmini, kişilik ve örgüt kültürünün rolü (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Dalal, R.S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255.
• Dagenais-Cooper, V. & Paille, P. (2012). Employee commitment and organizational citizenship behaviors in the hotel industry: Do foci matter? Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality and Tourism, 11, 303-326.
• Feather, N. T. & Rauter, K.A. (2004). Organizational citizenship behaviours in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 81-94.
• Gale, B. (2010). Örgütsel vatandaşlık ve örgütsel bağlılık ilişkisi (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Tokat
• Gautam, T., Van Dick, R., Upadhyay, N., & Davis, A.J. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior and organizational commitment in Nepal. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 305-314.
• George, J. M. & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good – doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work–organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310-329.
• Gül, H. (2002). Örgütsel bağlılık yaklaşımlarının mukayesesi ve değerlendirilmesi. Ege Academic Review, 2(1), 37-56.
• Gürbüz, S. (2006). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile duygusal bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1), 48-75.
• Gürbüz, S. (2007). Yöneticilerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarının iş tatmini ve algıladıkları örgütsel adalet ile ilişkisi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Gürbüz, S. (2009). Some possible antecedents of military personnel organizational citizenship behavior. Military Psychology, 21, 200–215.
• Gürbüz, S. (2011). Stratejik insan kaynakları yönetiminin örgütsel bağlılığa ve iş tatminine etkisi: İnsan kaynakları yöneticileri üzerinde bir araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(2), 397-418.
• Gürbüz, S., & Bekmezci M. (2012). İnsan kaynakları yönetimi uygulamalarının bilgi işçilerinin işten ayrılma niyetine etkisinde duygusal bağlılığın aracılık ve düzenleyicilik rolü. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(2), 189-213.
• Hunter, J.E. & Schmıdt, F.L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2.Baskı). California, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
• Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J.D, & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader–member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269-277.
• Ilies, R., Fulmer, I. S., Spitzmuller, M., & Johnson, M.D. (2009). Personality and citizenship behavior: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 945– 959.
• Karacaoğlu, K. & Güney, Y.S. (2010). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılıklarının, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları üzerindeki etkisi: Nevşehir ili örneği. Öneri Dergisi, 9(34), 137-153.
• Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131-133.
• Lepine, J.A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D.E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52-65.
• Lipsey, M.W. & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
• Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P.M., & Fetter, R. (1991). Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salesperson’s performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(1), 123–150.
• Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P.M., & Ahearne, M. (1998). Some possible antecedents and consequences of ın-role and extra-role salesperson performance. The Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 87-98.
• Mathieu, J. E. & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A Review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psycological Bulletin, 108(2), 171-194.
• Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the "side-bet theory" of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 372-378.
• Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Gellatly, I. R. (1990). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time – lagged reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 710 – 720.
• Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A Three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management, 1(1), 61-89.
• Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three – component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538 – 551.
• Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, California.
• Meyer, J. P. & Smith C. A. (2000). HRM practices and organizational commitment: Test of a mediation model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17(4), 319-331.
• Meyer, J. P. & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299-326.
• Meyer, J.P., Stanley, D.J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.
• Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (2004). TCM employee commitment survey academic users guide. Canada: Department of Psychology The University of Western Ontario
• Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E. & Vandenberghe C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991-1007.
• Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P., & Organ D. W. (1993). Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3), 209-225.
• Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543-1567.
• Motowidlo, S. J. & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
• Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. M. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
• Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. M. & Steers, R. M. (1982). Organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
• Ngunia, S., Sleegers, P., & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 145-177.
• Obeng, K. & Ugboro, I. (2003). Organizational commitment among public transit employees: An assessment study. Journal of The Transportation Research Forum, 57(2), 83-98.
• O’reilly, C. & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492-499.
• Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books.
• Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43-72.
• Organ, D.W. & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.
• Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenships behavior: It’s construct cleanup time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85-97.
• Özen, Ş. (2002). Türkiye’deki örgütler/yönetim araştırmalarında törensel görgülcülük sorunu. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 5-31.
• Paine, J.B. & Organ, D.W. (2000). The cultural matrix of organizational citizenship behavior: Some preliminary conceptual and empirical observations. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 45-59.
• Pianluprasidh, P. (2005). The effect of perceived organizational support and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behavior among nurses in Thailand (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Alliant İnternational University, California,
• Pigott, T. D. (2006). Book review: Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29, 236-237.
• Podsakoff, P. M. & Mackenzie, S. B. (1994). Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(3), 351-363.
• Podsakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., & Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
• Podsakoff, N.P., Whiting, S.W., Podsakoff, P.M., & Blume, B.D. (2009). Individual - and organizational - level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122-141.
• Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 257–266.
• Shore, L. M. & Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 774-780.
• Sığrı, Ü. (2007). İş görenlerin örgütsel bağlılıklarının Meyer ve Allen tipolojisiyle analizi: Kamu ve özel sektörde karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 261-278.
• Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W. & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.
• Somers, M. J. (1995). Organizational Commitment, Turnover and Absenteeism: An Examination of Direct and Interaction Effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(1),49-58.
• Stum, D. L. (1999). Workforce commitment: Strategies for the new work order. Strategy and Leadership, 27(1), 4-7.
• Şeşen, H. (2010). Kontrol odağı, genel öz yeterlilik, iş tatmini ve örgütsel adalet algısının örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışına etkisi: Ankara’da bulunan kamu kurumlarında bir araştırma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 28(2), 195-220.
• Şeşen, H. & Basım, N. H. (2012). Impact of satisfaction and commitment on teachers’ organizational citizenship. Educational Psychology, 32(4), 475-491.
• Tansky, J. W. (1993). Justice and organizational citizenship behavior: What is the relationship? Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3), 195-207.
• Tett, R. P. & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259-293.
• Ünüvar, T. G. (2011). An integrative model of job characteristics, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Vandenberghe, C. & Tremblay, M. (2008). The role of pay satisfaction and organizational commitment in turnover intentions: A two-sample study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 275-286.
• Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 215-285.
• Van Scotter, J. R. (2000). Relationships of task performance and contextual performance with turnover, job satisfaction, and affective commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 79-95.
• Wasti, S. A. (2005). Commitment profiles: Combinations of organizational commitment forms and job outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 290-308.
• Wasti, S. A. & Erdil, S. E. (2007). Bireycilik ve toplulukçuluk değerlerinin ölçülmesi: Benlik kurgusu ve Indcol ölçeklerinin Türkçe geçerlemesi. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7, (1-2), 39-66.
• Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418–428.
• Williams, L. J. & Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617.
• Yılmaz, K. & Bökeoğlu, O. Ç. (2008). Organizational citizenship behaviors and commitment in Turkish primary schools. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(5), 775-780.
• Yılmazer, A. (2010). Örgütsel bağlılık ve ekstra rol davranışı arasındaki ilişkiler: İmalat sektöründe bir araştırma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 5(2), 236-250.