TR
EN
Interrupting Rumination: Resilience As a Mediator of Negative Work Outcomes
Abstract
Grounded in conservation of resources theory and cognitive-behavioral perspectives, this study examines how work-related rumination relates to job stress, burnout, and turnover intention, and whether psychological resilience mediates these links. Survey data were collected from 436 white-collar employees working in the Turkish tourism sector. The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapping in SmartPLS 4. Results show that work-related rumination is positively associated with job stress and burnout and negatively associated with psychological resilience. Psychological resilience partially mediates the associations between rumination and both job stress and burnout. For turnover intention, the indirect path through psychological resilience is significant, whereas the direct path from rumination to turnover intention is not, indicating a primarily indirect relationship. These findings suggest that work-related rumination may be associated with adverse outcomes affecting individuals’ work and non-work lives, particularly in demanding work contexts, whereas psychological resilience appears to function as a protective personal resource in this process.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
None
Ethical Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants conform to the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its subsequent amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this research, Süleyman University Ethics Committee Approval was obtained from the Scientific Research Ethics Committee with a decision number: E.1034062, verification code: 323AFCC4.
References
- Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. Guilford Press.
- Bisht, N. S. (2019). A study on the role of work-related rumination in the relationship between job characteristics and burnout. South Asian Journal of Management, 26(2), 65–87.
- Brosschot, J. F., Gerin, W., & Thayer, J. F. (2006). The perseverative cognition hypothesis: A review of worry, prolonged stress-related physiological activation, and health. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.074
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
- Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The connor-davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
- Cropley, M., & Millward Purvis, L. J. (2003). Job strain and rumination about work issues during leisure time: A diary study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000093
- Cropley, M., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2011). Work and rumination. In J. Langan-Fox & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of stress in the occupations (pp. 487–503). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931153.00061
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Organisational Behaviour
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
August 17, 2026
Submission Date
December 3, 2025
Acceptance Date
April 7, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Number: TAOM2025
APA
Karakuş, G., Uzunbacak, H. H., & Akçakanat, T. (2026). Interrupting Rumination: Resilience As a Mediator of Negative Work Outcomes. İş Ve İnsan Dergisi, TAOM2025, 31-48. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.1835124
AMA
1.Karakuş G, Uzunbacak HH, Akçakanat T. Interrupting Rumination: Resilience As a Mediator of Negative Work Outcomes. İş ve İnsan Dergisi. 2026;(TAOM2025):31-48. doi:10.18394/iid.1835124
Chicago
Karakuş, Gülden, Hasan Hüseyin Uzunbacak, and Tahsin Akçakanat. 2026. “Interrupting Rumination: Resilience As a Mediator of Negative Work Outcomes”. İş Ve İnsan Dergisi, no. TAOM2025: 31-48. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.1835124.
EndNote
Karakuş G, Uzunbacak HH, Akçakanat T (August 1, 2026) Interrupting Rumination: Resilience As a Mediator of Negative Work Outcomes. İş ve İnsan Dergisi TAOM2025 31–48.
IEEE
[1]G. Karakuş, H. H. Uzunbacak, and T. Akçakanat, “Interrupting Rumination: Resilience As a Mediator of Negative Work Outcomes”, İş ve İnsan Dergisi, no. TAOM2025, pp. 31–48, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.18394/iid.1835124.
ISNAD
Karakuş, Gülden - Uzunbacak, Hasan Hüseyin - Akçakanat, Tahsin. “Interrupting Rumination: Resilience As a Mediator of Negative Work Outcomes”. İş ve İnsan Dergisi. TAOM2025 (August 1, 2026): 31-48. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.1835124.
JAMA
1.Karakuş G, Uzunbacak HH, Akçakanat T. Interrupting Rumination: Resilience As a Mediator of Negative Work Outcomes. İş ve İnsan Dergisi. 2026;:31–48.
MLA
Karakuş, Gülden, et al. “Interrupting Rumination: Resilience As a Mediator of Negative Work Outcomes”. İş Ve İnsan Dergisi, no. TAOM2025, Aug. 2026, pp. 31-48, doi:10.18394/iid.1835124.
Vancouver
1.Gülden Karakuş, Hasan Hüseyin Uzunbacak, Tahsin Akçakanat. Interrupting Rumination: Resilience As a Mediator of Negative Work Outcomes. İş ve İnsan Dergisi. 2026 Aug. 1;(TAOM2025):31-48. doi:10.18394/iid.1835124