The bibliometric journey of IJATE from local to global

Öz

International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education (IJATE) is one of the educational journals that is indexed in major worldwide databases such as Web of Science (WoS) and ERIC. This study presents the bibliometric characteristics of articles published in IJATE between 2014 and 2021 through the bibliometric analyses. Harzing's “Publish or Perish software” was used to collect citation data from WoS and Google Scholar databases as a tool to analyze the impact of articles. Firstly, when contributing institutions are analyzed, especially in recent, it is seen that researchers from countries such as France and Kuwait have been contributing to the journal with publications produced through international collaboration. Moreover, when the average citation numbers per article is calculated, it is understood that Australia (13) and Canada (3.5) are the countries that contribute significantly to the visibility of the journal. Such a trend will contribute significantly to the international recognition of the journal soon. On the other hand, there is a statistically significant positive relationship (r=0.339; p<0.01) between usage count and the number of citations by WoS. Our results reveal that while the number of references used in the articles was in consistent with the literature, the average article title lengths (12±3) were slightly longer than the ideal length (10±3). The results will provide important contributions to editors, reviewers, and authors in the journey of IJATE from local to global. The findings can guide authors, the editors and referees and also serve as a potential roadmap for the future studies and journal.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bibliometric
• Citation analysis
• IJATE
• Usage count
• Web of Science

References

1. Aman, V., & Botte, A. (2017). A bibliometric view on the internationalization of European educational research. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 843-868.
2. Aktaş, İ., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2022). Evaluation of the published articles in educational field: A Bibliometric analysis. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37(3), 1037-1050, https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2021067584
3. Arslan, R., Orbay, K., & Orbay, M. (2022). Bibliometric Profile of an Emerging Journal: Participatory Educational Research. Participatory Educational Research, 9(4), 153-171.
4. Budd, J.M., & Magnuson, L. (2010). Higher education literature revisited: Citation patterns examined. Research in Higher Education, 51(3), 294-304.
5. Chuang, K.Y., Huang, Y.L., & Ho, Y.S. (2007). A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan. Scientometrics, 72(2), 201–212
6. Civera, A., Lehmann, E.E., Paleari, S., & Stockinger, S.A. (2020). Higher education policy: Why hope for quality when rewarding quantity? Research Policy, 49(8), 104083.
7. Doğan, G., Dhyi, S.M.M.A., & Al, U. (2018). A Research on Turkey-addressed dropped journals from Web of Science. Turkish Librarianship, 32(3), 151-162.
8. Dong, B., Xu, G., Luo, X., Cai, Y., & Gao, W. (2012). A bibliometric analysis of solar power research from 1991 to 2010. Scientometrics, 93(3), 1101-1117.

9. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
10. Elgendi, M. (2019). Characteristics of a highly cited article: A machine learning perspective. IEEE Access, 7, 87977-87986.
11. Fire, M., & Guestrin, C. (2019). Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: Observing Goodhart’s law in action. GigaScience, 8(6), giz053.
12. Goodyear, R.K., Brewer, D.J., Gallagher, K.S., Tracey, T.J.G., Claiborn, C.D., Lichtenberg, J.W., & Wampold, B.E. (2009). The intellectual foundations of education: core journals and their impacts on scholarship and practice. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 700-706.
13. Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. Routledge.
14. Harzing, A.W. (2007). Publish or Perish, available from https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish Accessed November 30, 2022.
15. Harzing, A.W. (2022). Publishing in academic journals: Crafting your career in academia, Tarma Software Research Ltd, London, United Kingdom.
16. Henriksen, D. (2016). The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980-2013). Scientometrics, 107(2), 455-476.
17. HIUC-Head of Inter-University Council (Üniversitelerarası Kurul Başkanlığı) (2022). The panel for the assessment of the position of Associate Professor in Fundamental Educational Sciences, https://www.uak.gov.tr/Documents/docentlik/2018 ekim donemi/basvuru-sartlari/TA_Tablo1_2018E_071217.pdf (in Turkish). Accessed November 30, 2022.
18. Hicks, D. (2012). One size doesn’t fit all: On the co-evolution of national evaluation systems and social science publishing. Confero: Essays on Education Philosophy and Politics, 1(1), 67–90.
19. Huang, D.W. (2016). Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 329-335.
20. IJATE (International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education) (2022). Available from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijate Accessed November 30, 2022.
21. Letchford, A., Moat, H.S., & Preis T. (2015). The advantage of short paper titles. Royal Society Open Science, 2(150266), 1-6.
22. Liu, W., Hu, G., & Gu, M. (2016). The probability of publishing in first-quartile journals. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1273-1276.
23. Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E.D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160-1177.
24. Nemati-Anaraki, L., Zarghani, M., Ashoori-Mehranjani, F., & Eshaghi-Kopaei, S. (2019). Relationship between the usage count and the number of citations in the journals of Library and Information Sciences: The case of access type. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 2376. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2376 Accessed November 30, 2022.
25. Orbay, K., Miranda, R., & Orbay, M. (2020). Building journal impact factor quartile into the assessment of academic performance: A case study. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 1-13.
26. Orbay, M., Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Miranda, R. (2021). Analysis of the journal impact factor and related bibliometric indicators in education and educational research category. Education for Information, 37(3), 315-336.
27. Özenç Uçak, N., & Al, U. (2008). Citation Characteristics of Social Sciences Theses. Journal of Faculty of Letters, 25(2), 223–240.
28. Pajić, D., & Jevremov J. (2014) Globally national-locally international: Bibliometric analysis of a SEE psychology journal. Psihologija, 47(2), 263-267.
29. Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
30. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
31. Sezgin, A., Orbay, K., & Orbay, M. (2022). Educational research review from diverse perspectives: A Bibliometric analysis of Web of Science (2011-2020). Sage Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221141628
32. Tonta, Y. (2017). Journals published in Turkey and indexed in Web of Science: An evaluation. Turkish Librarianship, 31(4), 449-482.
33. ULAKBİM (Turkish Academic Network and Information Center) (2022). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/per , Accessed November 30, 2022.
34. Van Dalen, H.P. (2021). How the publish-or-perish principle divides a science: The case of economists. Scientometrics, 126(2), 1675-1694.
35. Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping, Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
36. Wang, X., Fang, Z., & Sun, X. (2016). Usage patterns of scholarly articles on Web of Science: a study on Web of Science usage count. Scientometrics, 109(2), 917-926.