Predicting early university dropout in open and distance education: A comparison of data mining models
Abstract
While open and distance education programs provide access to higher education, they face higher dropout rates than conventional campus-based programs. Early identification of students at risk is a critical step in supporting them. The existing literature on dropout has been quite limited. Despite the potential of Educational Data Mining (EDM) to transform student retention strategies, there is a noticeable lack of studies evaluating algorithm performance on national-level datasets. In particular, the use of data mining techniques in educational systems with big data has not been sufficiently investigated. This study fills the gap by comparing eight different classification algorithms, including various Decision Trees and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), on a massive dataset of 650,317 students. Focusing on naturally occurring early-stage data, this research aims to determine which models provide the highest prediction validity in the context of big data. The results show that the C5.0 algorithm has the highest classification accuracy, and the ANN provided the most robust discriminative power with an AUC of .867. The findings have the potential to contribute to actions aimed at preventing school dropout in open and distance education.
Keywords
References
- Agrusti, F., Bonavolonta, G., & Mezzini, M. (2019). University dropout prediction through educational data mining techniques: a systematic review. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135017
- Aguş, F.S. (2019). Açık ve uzaktan eğitimde öğrencilerin okulu bırakma nedenleri: Anadolu Üniversitesi açıköğretim sistemi üzerine bir araştırma [Reasons for student dropout in open and distance education: A study at Anadolu University open education system]. [Unpublished master's thesis]. Anadolu University.
- Ahmed, A.B.E.D., & Elaraby, I.S. (2014). Data mining: A prediction for student’s performance using classification method. World Journal of Computer Application and Technology, 2(2), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.13189/wjcat.2014.020203
- Akbaş, G., & Apar, A. (2010). Avrupa 2020 Stratejisi: Akıllı, sürdürülebilir ve kapsayıcı büyüme için avrupa stratejisi özet bilgi notu [Europe 2020 Strategy: European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth summary factsheet]. Ankara
- Akgün, K., & Özek, M.B. (2020). Eğitsel veri madenciliği yöntemi ile ilgili yapılmış çalışmaların incelenmesi: İçerik analizi [Examining the studies on educational data mining method: content analysis]. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 3(2), 127 142. https://doi.org/10.47714/uebt.753526
- Aksu, G. (2018). PISA başarısını tahmin etmede kullanılan veri madenciliği yöntemlerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of data mining methods used for estimating PISA success]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hacettepe University.
- Aksu, G., & Doğan, N. (2018). Veri madenciliğinde kullanılan öğrenme yöntemlerinin farklı koşullar altında karşılaştırılması [Comparison of learning methods used in data mining under different conditions]. Ankara Üniversitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 52(1), 163 188. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.464262
- Albreiki, B., Zaki, N., & Alashwal, H. (2021). A Systematic literature review of students’ performance prediction using machine learning techniques. Education Sciences, 11(9), Article 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090552
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
National and International Success Comparisons
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Selma Tosun
*
0000-0001-7444-7903
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
June 25, 2026
Publication Date
-
Submission Date
October 14, 2025
Acceptance Date
March 12, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Number: Advanced Online Publication