Analysis of the Relationship between University Students’ Problematic Internet Use and Loneliness

Öz

The computer is part of the information and communication age, and the Internet today is the most used communication tool. Studies have shown that there is a relationship between problematic Internet use and loneliness. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between problematic Internet use sub-scales and loneliness. In this study, data were collected from the college students at an Anatolian University in Turkey. The participants of this study consisted of 392 undergraduates. Of the participants, 43% are male (n = 167) and 57% female (n = 225). The average age for the participants is 22 years old. The Problematic Internet Use Scale and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale were used as data collection instruments. In the present study, structural equation modeling (SEM) procedures are used to explore the relationships that exist among the variables. The findings of the study revealed that while university students’ social benefit/social comfort of Internet has a direct effect on their excessive Internet use and negative consequences, it is related to the loneliness level indirectly. In addition, it is seen in the research model that with an increase in the negative consequences of the Internet, the loneliness level was raised. Another result from the study is that when university students’ excessive Internet use increased, their loneliness level decreased.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Problematic internet use
• loneliness
• structural equation modeling

Analysis of the Relationship between University Students’ Problematic Internet Use and Loneliness

Abstract

The computer is part of the information and communication age, and the Internet today is the most used communication tool. Studies have shown that there is a relationship between problematic Internet use and loneliness. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between problematic Internet use sub-scales and loneliness. In this study, data were collected from the college students at an Anatolian University in Turkey. The participants of this study consisted of 392 undergraduates. Of the participants, 43% are male (n = 167) and 57% female (n = 225). The average age for the participants is 22 years old. The Problematic Internet Use Scale and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale were used as data collection instruments. In the present study, structural equation modeling (SEM) procedures are used to explore the relationships that exist among the variables.  The findings of the study revealed that while university students’ social benefit/social comfort of Internet has a direct effect on their excessive Internet use and negative consequences, it is related to the loneliness level indirectly. In addition, it is seen in the research model that with an increase in the negative consequences of the Internet, the loneliness level was raised. Another result from the study is that when university students’ excessive Internet use increased, their loneliness level decreased.

Keywords

• Problematic internet use
• loneliness
• structural equation modeling

References

1. Akar, F. (2015). Purposes, causes and consequences of excessive internet use among Turkish adolescents. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 35-56. Doi: 10.14689/ejer.2015.60.3
2. Aktürk, A. O., Emlek, B., & Çelik, İ. (2017). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Facebook Bağlanma Stratejilerinin ve Yaşam Doyumlarının İncelenmesi. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(2). Doi:10.17860/mersinefd.336739
3. Ang, R. P., Chong, W. H., Chye, S., & Huan, V. S. (2012). Loneliness and generalized problematic Internet use: Parents’ perceived knowledge of adolescents’ online activities as a moderator. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1342-1347. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.019
4. Batigun, A. D., & Hasta, D. (2010). İnternet bağımlılığı: Yalnızlık ve kişilerarası ilişki tarzları açısından bir değerlendirme. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 11(3), 213-219.
5. Bonetti, L., Campbell, M. A., & Gilmore, L. (2010). The relationship of loneliness and social anxiety with children's and adolescents' online communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 279-285. Doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0215
6. Boz, B. & Adnan, M. (2017). How do freshman engineering students reflect an online calculus course? International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 5(4), 262-278. DOI:10.18404/ijemst.83046.
7. Bozoglan, B., Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2014). Problematic Internet use: Functions of use, cognitive absorption, and depression. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 117-123.
8. Can, G. (2004). Kişilik Gelişimi. B. Yeşilyaprak (Ed.) Gelişim ve öğrenme psikolojisi (113-142), Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.

9. Caplan, S.E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic internet use. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 721-736. Doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03019.x
10. Caplan, S.E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic internet use. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 2, 234-242. Doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9963
11. Casale, S., Caplan, S. E., & Fioravanti, G. (2016). Positive metacognitions about Internet use: The mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic use. Addictive Behaviors, 59, 84-88. Doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.014
12. Çelik, İ. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının sosyal ağ (Facebook) kullanımlarının incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Konya.
13. Celik, I., Sahin, I., & Aydin, M. (2014). Reliability and Validity Study of the Mobile Learning Adoption Scale Developed Based on the Diffusion of Innovations Theory. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 300-316. Doi: 10.18404/ijemst.65217
14. Ceyhan, A. & Ceyhan, E. (2008). Loneliness, depression, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of problematic internet use. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11(6), 699–701. Doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0255
15. Ceyhan, A. (2011). İnternet kullanma temel nedenlerine göre üniversite öğrencilerinin problemli internet kullanımı ve algıladıkları iletişim beceri düzeyleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 59-77.
16. Ceyhan, E. (2010). Problemli internet kullanım düzeyi üzerinde klinik statüsünün, internet kullanım amacının ve cinsiyetin yordayıcılığı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 1323-1355.
17. Ceyhan, E., Ceyhan, A. A., & Gürcan, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Problematic Internet Usage Scale. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(1), 411-416.
18. Demir, A. (1989). UCLA yalnızlık ölçeğinin gecerlik ve güvenirliği [Validity and reliability of UCLA loneliness scale]. Psikoloji dergisi, 23, 14–18.
19. Demirer, V., Bozoglan, B., & Sahin, I. (2013). Preservice teachers' internet addiction in terms of gender, internet access, loneliness and life satisfaction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(1), 56-63.
20. Derbyshire, K. L., Lust, K. A., Schreiber, L. R., Odlaug, B. L., Christenson, G. A., Golden, D. J., & Grant, J. E. (2013). Problematic Internet use and associated risks in a college sample. Comprehensive psychiatry, 54(5), 415-422. Doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.11.003
21. Engelberg, E., & Sjöberg, L. (2004). Internet use, social skills, and adjustment. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(1), 41-47. Doi: 10.1089/109493104322820101
22. Erdogan, N. (2016). Communities of practice in online learning environments: A sociocultural perspective of science education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(3), 246-257. DOI:10.18404/ijemst.20679.
23. Eren, F., Çelik, İ., & Aktürk, A. O. (2014). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin Facabook algısı: bir metafor analizi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 22(2), 635-648.
24. Esen, E. & Siyez, D. M. (2016). Ergenlerde internet bağımlılığını yordayan psiko-sosyal değişkenlerin incelenmesi. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(36).
25. Hamburger, Y. A. ve Ben-Artzi E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 71–80. Doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00014-6
26. Harrington, D. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. Doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
28. Inderbitzen, H. M., Walters, K. S., & Bukowski, A. L. (1997). The role of social anxiety in adolescent peer relations: Differences among sociometric status groups and rejected subgroups. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26(4), 338-348. Doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2604_2
29. Joreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1984). LISREL–VI user’s guide (3rd ed.). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
30. Karahan, E. & Roehrig, G. (2016). Use of web 2.0 technologies to enhance learning experiences in alternative school settings. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(4), 272-283. DOI:10.18404/ijemst.32930.
31. Karal, H., & Kokoç, M. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal ağ siteleri kullanım amaçlarını belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 1(3). Doi: 10.16949/turcomat.85676
32. Kesici, S., Sahin, I. & Thompson, A. (2010). Prediction of Preservice Teachers’ Problematic Internet Use by Their Psychological Needs and Internet Use Functions. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 1471-1478). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
33. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34. Koc, M., & Ferneding, K. A. (2013). An Ethnographic Inquiry on Internet Cafes within the Context of Turkish Youth Culture. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3).
35. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet para¬dox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74. Doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00248
36. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?. American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
37. Kubey, R. W., Lavin, M. J, & Barrows, J. R. (2001). Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. J Communication, 51:366-382. Doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02885.x
38. Kurtaran, G. T. (2003). İnternet bağımlılığını yordayan değişkenlerin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek lisans tezi. Mersin Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Mersin.
39. Lam, L. T., & Wong, E. M. (2015). Stress moderates the relationship between problematic Internet use by parents and problematic Internet use by adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(3), 300-306. Doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.263
40. Li, X., Li, D., & Newman, J. (2013). Parental behavioral and psychological control and problematic Internet use among Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of self-control. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(6), 442-447. Doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0293
41. Li, X., Newman, J., Li, D., & Zhang, H. (2016). Temperament and adolescent problematic Internet use: The mediating role of deviant peer affiliation. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 342-350. Doi: 0.1016/j.chb.2016.02.075
42. Lopez-Fernandez, O., Honrubia-Serrano, M. L., Gibson, W., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). Problematic Internet use in British adolescents: An exploration of the addictive symptomatology. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 224-233. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.042
43. Mazzoni, E., Baiocco, L., Cannata, D., & Dimas, I. (2016). Is internet the cherry on top or a crutch? Offline social support as moderator of the outcomes of online social support on Problematic Internet Use. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 369-374. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.032
44. Moody, E. J. (2001). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 393-401. Doi: 10.1089/109493101300210303
45. Morahan-Martin, J. (1999). The relationship between loneliness and Internet use and abuse. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2(5), 431-439. Doi: 10.1089/cpb.1999.2.431
46. Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Computers in human behavior, 16(1), 13-29. Doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00049-7
47. Moreno, M. A., Jelenchick, L. A., & Christakis, D. A. (2013). Problematic internet use among older adolescents: A conceptual framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1879-1887. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.053
48. Mossbarger, B. (2008). Is internet addiction addressed in the classroom? A survey of Psychology text books. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 468–474. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.02.002
49. Odabasioglu, G. Ozturk, O. Genc, Y., & Pektas, O. (2007). On olguluk bir seri ile internet bağımlılığı-klinik görünümleri. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 8, 46-51. Doi: 10.24289/ijsser.279705
50. Odaci, H., & Celik, Ç. B. (2013). Who are problematic internet users? An investigation of the correlations between problematic internet use and shyness, loneliness, narcissism, aggression and self-perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2382-2387. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.026
51. Odaci, H., & Cikrikci, O. (2014). Problematic internet use in terms of gender, attachment styles and subjective well-being in university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 61-66. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.019 Oktan, V. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinde problemli internet kullanimi, yalnizlik ve algilanan sosyal destek. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(1), 281-292.
52. Ozcan, N. & Buzlu, S. (2005). Problemli İnternet Kullanımını Belirlemede Yardımcı Bir Araç: “İnternet Bilissel Durum Ölçeği’nin Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Geçerlilik ve Güvenirliği. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 6(1); 19-26.
53. Ozgur, H., Demiralay, T., & Demiralay, I. (2014). Exploration of problematic Internet use and loneliness among distance education students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 75-90. Doi: 10.17718/tojde.43009
54. Ozturk, E. Ozmen, S. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının problemli internet kullanım davranışlarının, kişilik tipi, utangaçlık ve demografik değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 1785-1808.
55. Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196. Doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
56. Pawlak, C. (2002). Correlates of Internet use and addiction in adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 63(5-A), pp. 1727.
57. Peris, R., Gimeno, M. A., Pinazo, D., Ortet, G., Carrero, V., Sanchiz, M., & Ibanez, I. (2002). Online chat rooms: Virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented people. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(1), 43-51. Doi: 10.1089/109493102753685872
58. Pontes, H. M., Caplan, S. E., & Griffiths, M. D. (2016). Psychometric validation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in a Portuguese sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 823-833. Doi: 0.1016/j.chb.2016.06.015
59. Roscoe, B., & Skomski, G. G. (1989). Loneliness among late adolescents. Adolescence, 24(96), 947.
60. Rotunda, R. J., Kass, S. J., Sutton, M. A., & Leon, D. T. (2003). Internet use and misuse preliminary findings from a new assessment instrument. Behavior Modification, 27(4), 484-504. Doi: 10.1177/0145445503255600
61. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A. & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472
62. Ryan, T. & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658–1664. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004
63. Shaw, L. H., & Gant, L. M. (2002). In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 157-171. Doi: 10.1089/109493102753770552
64. Sheeks, M., & Birchmeier, Z. (2007). Shyness, sociability, and the use of computer-mediated communication in relationship development. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(1), 64-70. Doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9991
65. Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 67-75. Doi: 10.1027/1864-1105.20.2.67
66. Siciliano, V., Bastiani, L., Mezzasalma, L., Thanki, D., Curzio, O., & Molinaro, S. (2015). Validation of a new Short Problematic Internet Use Test in a nationally representative sample of adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 177-184. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.097
67. Silverman, T. (1999). The Internet and relational theory. American Psychologist, 54, 780–781. Doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.780
68. Škařupová, K., Ólafsson, K., & Blinka, L. (2015). Excessive internet use and its association with negative experiences: quasi-validation of a short scale in 25 European countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 118-123. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.047
69. Spada, M. M. (2014). An overview of problematic Internet use. Addictive behaviors, 39(1), 3-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.007
70. Tanriverdi, S. (2012). Ortaöğretim öğrencelerinde internet bağımlılığı ile algılanan sosyal destek arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Van.
71. Tokunaga, R. S., & Rains, S. A. (2016). A review and meta-analysis examining conceptual and operational definitions of problematic Internet use. Human Communication Research, 42(2), 165-199. Doi: 10.1111/hcre.12075
72. Tutgun, A. (2009). Öğretmen Adaylarının Problemli İnternet Kullanım Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi: İstanbul.
73. Tutgun, A. (2012). BÖTE bölümü öğrencilerinin internet kullanım özellikleri ve tercihlerinin incelenmesi. Online Academic Journal of Information Technology, 3(6), 27-45. Doi: 10.5824/1309-1581.2012.1.002.x
74. Unsal, H., Sahin, I., Celik, I., Akturk, A. O., & Shelley, M. (2012). Relationship between secondary school students’ perceived social support and their self-efficacy in educational Internet use. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 2512-2517). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
75. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental psychology, 43(2), 267. Doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
76. Winzelberg, A. (1997). The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(3), 393-407. Doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00016-2
77. Yeh, Y. C., Ko, H. C., Wu, J. Y. W. ve Cheng, C. P. (2008). Gender differences in relationships of actual and virtual social support to internet addiction mediated through depressive symptoms among college students in Taiwan. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 485-487. Doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0134
78. Yıldız, C., & Bölükbaş, K. (2005). İnternet kafeler, gençlik ve sosyal sapma. Ahmet Tarcan (Edt). İnternet ve toplum Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.