Functional Status of Women and Their Partners After Childbirth

Year 2018, , 510 - 523, 19.09.2018

Sevgi Özkan , Sinem Göral Türkcü Özlem Kayhan Pınar Serçekuş Ak , Ümran Sevil

https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.443222

Cited By: 6

Abstract

The aim of this study is to define the changes within the social dimension of the functional status of women and their partners in the months following the birth of their child. A total of 90 participants were included in the study (45 women and 45 partners). Data were collected in two steps via face-to-face interviews. The first step involved administration of a personal information form and the functional status inventories to the women and their partners between the postpartum sixth and eighth weeks. The second step involved re-administration of the same functional status inventories to the women and their partners in the postpartum sixth month. Results from the examination of the functional status of the women and their partners in the postpartum second and sixth months showed that there was a significant increase in the areas of household activities (p=0,000), social and community activities (p=0,000) and self-care activities (p=0,000) for the women in the sixth month; similarly, for the fathers, household activities (p=0,008), social and community activities (p=0,003) and child care activities (p=0,007) rose in the sixth month. Furthermore, the study found that certain sociodemographic variables had an effect on functional status (p=0,000). It is important that nurses and/or midwives support parents during the pregnancy process, particularly during the transition into their new roles as women and their partners, and help prepare them for the changes to occur as they enter into this new period of life.

Keywords

Functional Status, Transition to Motherhood, Transition to Fatherhood

Functional Status of Women and Their Partners After Childbirth

Abstract

The aim of
this study is to define the changes within the social dimension of the
functional status of women and their partners in the months following the birth
of their child.
A total of 90 participants were included in the study
(45 women and 45 partners). Data were collected in two steps via face-to-face
interviews. The first step involved administration of a personal information
form and the functional status inventories to the women and their partners
between the postpartum sixth and eighth weeks. The second step involved
re-administration of the same functional status inventories to the women and
their partners in the postpartum sixth month. Results from the examination of the functional
status of the women and their partners in the postpartum second and sixth
months showed that there was a significant increase in the areas of household
activities (p=0,000), social and community activities (p=0,000) and self-care
activities (p=0,000) for the women in the sixth month; similarly, for the
fathers,  household activities (p=0,008),
social and community activities (p=0,003) and child care activities (p=0,007)
rose in the sixth month. Furthermore, the study found that certain sociodemographic
variables had an effect on functional status (p=0,000). It is important that nurses and/or
midwives support parents during the pregnancy process, particularly during the
transition into their new roles as women and their partners, and help prepare them
for the changes to occur as they enter into this new period of life.

Keywords

Functional Status, Transition to Motherhood, Transition to Fatherhood

References

• Anderson, A.M. (1996). The father- infant releationship; becoming connected. Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses,1(2), 83-92.
• Anderson, A.M. (1996). The father- infant releationship; becoming connected. Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses,1(2), 83-92.
• Apay Ejder, S., & Pasinlioğlu, T. A. (2009). Sectional study: the invertigation of functional situations of the women after the labor. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 1(1), 20-29.
• Barclay, L., Donovan, J., & Genovese, A. (1996). Men's experiences during their partner's first pregnancy: a grounded theory analysis. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 13(3),12-24.
• Barclay, L., & Lupton, D. (1999). The experiences of new fatherhood: a socio-cultural analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(4), 1013-1020.
• Başbakkal, Z. (1999). Babaların bebek bakımındaki rolü (Doktora Tezi). [Role of parents in baby care] (Doctoral Thesis). Ege Üniversitesi, Institute of Health Sciences, Izmir.
• Beji, N.K., Coşkun, A., & Yıldırım, G. (2003). Effects of childbirth on the functional ability of women. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 1, 22-29.
• Fawcett, J., & Tulman, L.(1990). Building a programme of research from the roy adaptation model of nursing, Journal of Advenced Nursing, 15(6), 720-725.
• Fawcett, J., Tulman, L., & Myers, S. (1988). Development of the inventory of functional status after childbirth. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 33(6), 252-260.
• Fichardt, A.E., Van Wyk, N.C., & Weich, M. (1994). The needs of postpartum women. Curationis, 17(1), 15-21.
• Gjerdingen, D.K., & Chaloner, K.(1994). Mothers’ experience with houshold roles and social support during the first postpartum years. Women Health, 21(4), 54-74.
• Henderson, A.D, & Brouse, A.J. (1991). The experiences of new fathers during the first 3 weeks of life. Journal of Advanced Nursing,16(3), 293-298.
• Herbert, P. (1994). Support of first- time mothers in three months after birth. Nursing Times, 90(24), 36-37.
• Hodnett, E.D. (1996). Nursing support of the laboring woman. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 25(3), 257-264.
• McVeigh, C.A. (1997). Functional status after childbirth: a comparison of Australian women from english and non-english speaking backraunds. Australian College of Midwives Incorporated Journal, 10(2), 15-21.
• McVeigh, C. A. (2000a). Anxiety and functional status after childbirth. Australian College of Midwives Journal, 13(1), 14-18.
• McVeigh, C.A. (2000b). Satisfaction with social support and functional status after childbirth. Maternal Child Nursing Journal, 25(1), 25-30.
• McVeigh, C.A. (2001). Functional status after fatherhood, an Australian study. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 31, 32-38.
• McVeigh, C.A., Chaboyer, W. (2002). Reability and validity of inventory of functional status after childbirth when used in Australian population. Nursing & Health Sciences, 4(3), 107-112.
• Özkan, S., & Sevil, Ü. (2007). The study of validity and reliability of inventory of functional status after childbirth. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 6, 199-208.
• Posmontier, B. (2008). Functional status outcomes in mothers with and without postpartum Depression. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 53(4), 310-318.
• Sevil, Ü., & Özkan, S. (2010). Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the inventory of functional status-fathers (IFS-F). Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Science, 2, 16-23.
• St John, W., Cameron, C, & McVeigh. C. (2005). Meeting the challenge of new fatherhood during the early weeks. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 34(2), 180-189.
• Şanlı,Y., & Öncel, S. (2014). Kadınların doğum sonrası fonksiyonel durumları ve etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi [Evaluation of the functional status of woman after childbirth and effective factors]. Journal of Turkish Obstetric and Gynecology Society, 2, 105-114.
• Tulman, L., & Fawcett, J. (1988). Return of functional ability after childbirth. Nursing Research, 37, 70-75.
• Tulman, L., Fawcett, J., Groblewski, L., & Silverman, L. (1990). Changes in functional status after childbirth. Nursing Research, 39(2), 70-75.
• Tulman, L.J., Fawcett, J., & Weiss, M. (1993). The inventory of functional status−fathers: development and psychometric testing. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 38, 276-282.