Short Communication
BibTex RIS Cite

When interviewing: how many is enough?

Year 2020, , 73 - 79, 01.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.693217

Abstract

Researchers need to know what is an appropriate sample size for interview work, but how does one decide upon an acceptable number of people to interview? This question is not relevant to case study work where one would typically interview every member of a case, or in situations where it is both desirable and feasible to interview all target population members. However, in much of qualitative and mixed-methods research and evaluation, the researcher can only reasonably interview a subset of the target population. How big or small should that subset be? This paper provides a brief explanation of why the concept of generalization is inappropriate with respect to the findings from qualitative interviewing, what wording to use in place of generalization, and how one should decide on sample size for interviews.

References

  • Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. Retrieved December 28, 2019 from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf
  • Channell, A. C. (2019). Teacher and Parent Perspectives on Alignment to The Next Generation Science Standards Following Teacher Professional Development. (PhD), Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.
  • Cobern, W. W., Gibson, A. T., & Underwood, S. A. (1999). Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive Study of 16 Ninth Graders' Everyday Thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 541 564. DOI.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098 2736(199905)36:5<541:AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-1
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. American Psychologist, 30(2), 116-127. DOI:10.1037/h0076829
  • Ellis, P. D. (2010). Effect Size FAQs. Retrieved December 20, 2019 from https://effectsizefaq.com/about/
  • Gobo, G. (2007). Sampling, representativeness and generalizability. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, p. 405-426. ISBN-13: 978-0761947769.
  • Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: the Trees, the Forest, and the Low-Hanging Fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886-1891. DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812.
  • Royall, R. M. (1986). The Effect of Sample Size on the Meaning of Significance Tests. The American Statistician, 40(4), 313-315. DOI:10.2307/2684616
  • Seidman, I. E. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and The Social Sciences, 3rd Edition. Teachers College Press: Columbia University, New York. ISBN-13: 978-0807746660.
  • Teo, T. (2013) (Ed.). Handbook of Quantitative Methods for Educational Research. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands. ISBN: 978-94-6209-404-8.

When interviewing: how many is enough?

Year 2020, , 73 - 79, 01.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.693217

Abstract

Researchers need to know what is an appropriate sample size for interview work, but how does one decide upon an acceptable number of people to interview? This question is not relevant to case study work where one would typically interview every member of a case, or in situations where it is both desirable and feasible to interview all target population members. However, in much of qualitative and mixed-methods research and evaluation, the researcher can only reasonably interview a subset of the target population. How big or small should that subset be? This paper provides a brief explanation of why the concept of generalization is inappropriate with respect to the findings from qualitative interviewing, what wording to use in place of generalization, and how one should decide on sample size for interviews.

Thanks

Here is an example of how this approach might be worded for a research proposal. For this example, we are indebted to our colleague Dr Brandy Pleasants.

References

  • Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. Retrieved December 28, 2019 from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf
  • Channell, A. C. (2019). Teacher and Parent Perspectives on Alignment to The Next Generation Science Standards Following Teacher Professional Development. (PhD), Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.
  • Cobern, W. W., Gibson, A. T., & Underwood, S. A. (1999). Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive Study of 16 Ninth Graders' Everyday Thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 541 564. DOI.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098 2736(199905)36:5<541:AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-1
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. American Psychologist, 30(2), 116-127. DOI:10.1037/h0076829
  • Ellis, P. D. (2010). Effect Size FAQs. Retrieved December 20, 2019 from https://effectsizefaq.com/about/
  • Gobo, G. (2007). Sampling, representativeness and generalizability. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, p. 405-426. ISBN-13: 978-0761947769.
  • Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: the Trees, the Forest, and the Low-Hanging Fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886-1891. DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812.
  • Royall, R. M. (1986). The Effect of Sample Size on the Meaning of Significance Tests. The American Statistician, 40(4), 313-315. DOI:10.2307/2684616
  • Seidman, I. E. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and The Social Sciences, 3rd Edition. Teachers College Press: Columbia University, New York. ISBN-13: 978-0807746660.
  • Teo, T. (2013) (Ed.). Handbook of Quantitative Methods for Educational Research. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands. ISBN: 978-94-6209-404-8.
There are 10 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

William Cobern This is me 0000-0002-0219-203X

Betty Adams This is me 0000-0002-8554-8002

Publication Date April 1, 2020
Submission Date December 17, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Cobern, W., & Adams, B. (2020). When interviewing: how many is enough?. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(1), 73-79. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.693217

Cited By







Making Ends Meet in a Pandemic: African Library Initiatives During COVID‐19
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.890









Establishing survey validity: A practical guide
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
William COBERN
https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.781366


23823             23825             23824