Phaseolus Türlerinin Sıcaklık Stresine Dayanıklılık için Yerel Çeşitlerle Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Sanayi öncesi döneme göre dünya genelinde yüzey sıcaklığı yaklaşık bir derece artmış ve iklim değişikliği nedeniyle de sıcaklık artışının gelecekte de devam edeceği tahmin edilmektedir. Yakın gelecekteki ihtiyaçları karşılamak için sıcaklığa dayanıklı fasulye türlerine (Phaseolus spp.) ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı (i) sekiz P. acutifolius A. Gray genotipi, iki P. dumosus Macfady genotipi, sekiz P. coccineus L. genotipi, beş P. lunatus L. genotipi, altı P. vulgaris L. genotipi ve P. vulgaris × P. coccineus türler arası bir melez olmak üzere sıcaklığa dayanıklı fasulyeleri belirlemek, (ii) yerel çeşitleri Phaseolus türleriyle karşılaştırmak ve (iii) faktör ve fenotipik korelasyonlar kullanarak fenolojik, morfolojik ve agronomik özellikleri değerlendirmektir. Toplam 30 genotip, sera koşullarında sıcaklık stresine maruz bırakılmıştır. En yüksek sıcaklık 55 0C olarak ölçülmüştür. Phaseolus türlerinin fenolojik, morfolojik ve agronomik özellikleri fenotipik korelasyon ve faktör analizleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. P. acutifolius'un bir genotipi (PI-319447) ve P. vulgaris'in iki tescilli çeşidi (Goynuk98 ve Ozayse) ile P. acutifolius'un üç genotipi (PI-312198, PI-535202 ve PI-535236) daha erken çiçek açan genotipler olarak belirlenmiştir. P. vulgaris'in tescilli bir çeşidi (Goynuk98) ve yerel çeşidi (APN3062), bitki başına en yüksek tane verimine sahip olmuştur. Tane verimi stres toleransını belirlemede önemli parametre olarak görülmektedir. P. acutifolius ve P. vulgaris'in sıcaklığa dayanıklı genotiplerinin, erken olgunlaşmayla sıcaklıktan kaçma yeteneğinin yanı sıra sıcaklık stresine katlanma yeteneğine de sahip olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bazı yerel çeşitlerin ise yüksek tane verimi nedeniyle sıcaklık stresi koşullarında yetiştirilebileceği düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

• Tarımsal özellik
• Fasulye
• Sıcaklık
• Morfolojik özellik
• Phaseolus
• Fenolojik özellik

Project Number

FYL-2019-4326

Heat Stress Resilience of Phaseolus Species in Comparison to Local Cultivars

Abstract

The global surface temperature in the world has increased by about one degree since pre-industrial period and it is estimated that the temperature increase will continue in the future owing to climate change. Heat-resilient bean species (Phaseolus spp.) are required to supply requirements for the near future. The aim of this study is (i) to determine the heat-resilient beans including eight genotypes of P. acutifolius A. Gray, two genotypes of P. dumosus Macfady, eight genotypes of P. coccineus L., five genotypes of P. lunatus L., six genotypes of P. vulgaris L., and an interspecific hybrid between P. vulgaris × P. coccineus, (ii) to compare local cultivars to Phaseolus species and (iii) to evaluate phenological, morphological and agronomic characteristics using factor and phenotypic correlations. A total of 30 genotypes were subjected to heat stress during reproductive stage under greenhouse conditions. Maximum temperature was rise the 55 0C. The phenological, morphological and agronomical characteristics of Phaseolus species were studied using phenotypic correlations and factor analysis. A genotype (PI-319447) of P. acutifolius and two registered cultivars (Goynuk98 and Ozayse) of P. vulgaris and three genotypes (PI-312198, PI-535202 and PI-535236) of P. acutifolius were determined to be earlier-flowered genotypes. A registered cultivar (Goynuk98) and landrace (APN3062) of P. vulgaris had the highest seed yield per plant.Seed yield is considered an important character in determining stress tolerance. Heat-resilient genotypes of P. acutifolius and P. vulgaris were considered to be not only escape ability via earliness but also buffering capability of heat stress. Some local cultivars were considered to grow under heat stress conditions due to high seed yield.

Keywords

• Agronomical trait
• Bean
• Heat
• Morphological trait
• Phaseolus
• Phenological trait

Project Number

FYL-2019-4326

Thanks

We thank the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for providing us with genetic materials, Akdeniz University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit for its support for this study (FYL-2019-4326), and the Deanery of the Faculty of Agriculture for use of the Venlo greenhouse to grow the plants. We are also grateful to C. TOKER (Prof.) for his valuable contributions to the research and H. SARI (PhD) for the statistical analysis.

References

1. Almeida, C., & Pedrosa-Harand, A. (2013). High macro-collinearity between lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) and the common bean (P. vulgaris L.) as revealed by comparative cytogenetic mapping. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 126(7): 1909-1916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2106-9
2. Angioi, S. A., Rau, D., Attene, G., Nanni, L., Bellucci, E., Logozzo, G., & Papa, R. (2010). Beans in Europe: origin and structure of the European landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 121(5): 829-843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1353-2
3. Asfaw, A., Ambachew, D., Shah, T., & Blair, M. W. (2017).Trait associations in diversity panels of the two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) gene pools grown under well-watered and water-stress conditions.Frontiers in Plant Science, 8: 733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00733
4. Aquino-Bolaños, E. N., García-Díaz, Y. D., Chavez-Servia, J. L., Carrillo-Rodríguez, J. C., Vera-Guzmán A. M., & Heredia-García, E. (2016). Anthocyanins, polyphenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 28(8): 581-588. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2016-02-147
5. Basavaraja, T., Manjunatha L., Chandora R., Gurumurthy S., & Singh N. P. (2020). Assessment of genetic variability, diversity and trait correlation analysis in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Legume Research, 44(3): 252-260. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4208
6. Bitocchi, E., Nanni, L., Bellucci, E., Rossi, M., Giardini, A., Zeuli, P. S., Logozzo, G., Stougaard, J., McClean, P., Attene, G., & Papa, P. (2012). Mesoamerican origin of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is revealed by sequence data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(14): 788-796. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108973109
7. Broughton, W. J., Hernandez, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P., &Vanderleyden, J. (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.)–model food legumes. Plant and Soil, 252 (1): 55-128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024146710611
8. Bomers, S., Sehr, E. M., Adam, E., von Gehren, P., Hansel-Hohl, K., Prat, N., & Ribarits, A. (2022). Towards heat tolerant runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus L.) by utilizing plant genetic resources. Agronomy, 12(3): 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030612

9. Borel, J. C., Ramalho, M. A. P., de Carvalho, V. R. F., Abreu, Â. D. F. B. (2013). Genetic and Phenotypic parameters in common bean segregant populations from intra and inter-gene pool crosses of elite lines. Euphytica, 193(1): 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0907-1
10. Bornowski, N., Hart, J. P., Palacios, A. V., Ogg, B., Brick, M. A., Hamilton, J. P., Beaver, J. S., Buell, C. R.,& Porch, T. (2023). Genetic variation in a tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray) diversity panel reveals loci associated with biotic stress resistance. The Plant Genome, 16: e20363. https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20363
11. Buitrago-Bitar, M.A., Cortés, A. J., López-Hernández, F., Londoño-Caicedo, J. M., Muñoz-Florez, J. E., Muñoz, L. C., & Blair, M. W. (2021).Allelic diversity at abiotic stress responsive genes in relationship to ecological drought indices for cultivated tepary bean, Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray, and its wild relatives. Genes, 12(4): 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040556
12. Burbano-Erazo, E., León-Pacheco, R. I., Cordero-Cordero, C. C., López-Hernández, F., Cortés, A. J., &Tofiño-Rivera, A. P. (2021). Multi-environment yield components in advanced common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) × tepary bean (P. acutifolius A. Gray) interspecific lines for heat and drought tolerance. Agronomy, 11(10): 1978.https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101978
13. Cagirgan, M. I., & Yildirim, M. B. (1990).An application of factor analysis to data from control and macro mutant populations of ‘Quantum’ barley. Journal of Faculty of Agriculture of Akdeniz University, 4: 125-138.
14. Canci, H., & Toker, C. (2009).Evaluation of yield criteria for drought and heat resistance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195(1): 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00345.x
15. Cattel, R. B. (1965). Factor analysis: An introduction to essentials. I. The propose and underlying models. Biometrics, 21: 190-215.
16. Checa, O., Ceballos, H., & Blair, M. V. (2006). Generation means analysis of climbing ability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Heredity, 97(5): 456-465. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esl025
17. Cortes, A. J. (2013). On the origin of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).American Journal of Plant Sciences, 4(10): 1998-2000. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.410248
18. De la Fuente, M., Lopez-Pedrouso, M., Alonso, J., Santalla, M., De Ron, A. M., Alvarez, G., & Zapata, C. (2012). In-depth characterization of the phaseolin protein diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 50(3): 315-325.
19. Dohle, S., BernyMier y Teran, J.C., Egan, A., Kisha, T., &Khoury, C.K. (2019). Wild Beans (PhaseolusL.) of North America. InS. Greene, K. Williams, C.Khoury, M. Kantar, & L. Marek (Eds.), NorthAmericanCrop Wild Relatives. Springer (pp. 99-127). Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97121-6_4
20. Ellis, T. H. N., Hofer, J. M., Vikeli, E., Ambrose, M. J., Higuera-Poveda, P., Wingen, L. U., &Chayut, N. (2021). Diversity of pod shape in Pisum. Diversity, 13(5): 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13050203
21. Flores-Sosa, Á. R., Aquino-Bolaños, E. N., Cardador-Martínez, A., Chávez-Servia, J. L., Vera-Guzmán, A. M., Carrillo-Rodríguez, J. C., & Jiménez, J. E. A. (2020). Variation in protein and amino acids content among landraces of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 32(10): 750-760. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2020.v32.i10.2175
22. García-Díaz Y. D., Vera-Guzmán A. M., Aquino-Bolaños E. N., Muciño-Serrano S., & Chávez-Servia J. L. (2022). Phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and mineral contents in grains of Phaseoluslunatus L. and P. coccineus L. landraces. Legume Research, 45(9): 1155-1160. https://doi.org/10.18805/LRF-690
23. Gepts, P. (1998). Origin and evolution of common bean: Past events and recent trends. HortScience, 33(7): 1124-1130. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.33.7.1124
24. Gross, Y., & Kigel, J. (1994). Differential sensitivity to high temperature of stages in the reproductive development of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Research, 36(3): 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)90112-0
25. Guerra-García, A., Suárez-Atilano, M., Mastretta-Yanes, A., Delgado-Salinas, A., & Piñero, D. (2017). Domestication genomics of the open-pollinated scarlet runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 8: 1891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01891
26. Hamabwe, S. M., Otieno, N., Soler-Garzón, A., Miklas, P., Parker, T., Kramer, D. M., Chattopadhyay, A., Cheelo, P., Kuwabo, K., & Kamfwa, K. (2023). Identification of quantitative trait loci for drought tolerance in Bukoba/Kijivu Andean mapping population of common bean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 136: 222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04463-2
27. Hamburdă, S. B., Munteanu, N., Stoleru, V., Butnariu, G., Teliban, G. C., & Popa, L. D. (2014). Experimental results on runner bean cultivation (Phaseolus coccineus L.) in intercropping system. Lucrări Științifice, Seria Horticultură, 57 (1): 75-80.
28. Jankulovskaa, M., Ivanovska, S., & Atanasova, N. S. (2021).Morphological variability of seed qualitative and quantitative traits in Macedonian runner bean local varieties.ISHS Acta Horticulturae 1320: VIII South-Eastern Europe Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1320.5
29. Kwak, M., &Gepts, P. (2009).Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. Fabaceae).Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 118(5): 979-992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0955-4
30. Landi, N., Alberico, L., Clemente, A., Peddio, S., Hussain, H. Z., Ragucci, S., ...,& Di Maro, A. (2023). Nutritional, metabolic and genetic profiling of ‘Cerato’and ‘Curniciello’bean landraces from Caserta, Southern Italy. Food Bioscience, 55: 102975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102975
31. Lin, T. Y., &Marhart, A. H. (1990). Temperature effects on mitochondrial respiration in Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray and Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Physiology, 94(1): 54-58. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.1.54
32. Lioi, L., Zuluaga, D. L., Pavan, S., &Sonnante, G. (2019). Genotyping-by-sequencing reveals molecular genetic diversity in Italian common bean landraces. Diversity, 11(9): 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11090154
33. Mackie, W. (1943). Origin, dispersal, and variability of the lima bean, Phaseolus lunatus. Hilgardia, 15 (1): 1-29. Majid, M. A, Khanum, S., Saikh, M. A. Q., Bhuiya, A. D. (1982).Genetic variability and correlation studies in black gram. Bangladesh Journal of Agriculture, 7: 98-102.
34. Mammo, K.,Wegary, D., Lule, D.,&Mekbib, F. (2015). Agronomic performance and compatibility of common bean genotypes intercropped with maize. Ethiopian Journal of Crop Science, 4(1): 30-44.
35. Martínez-Nieto, M. I., González-Orenga, S., Soriano, P., Prieto-Mossi, J., Larrea, E., Doménech-Carbó, A., Tofei, A. M., Vicente, O., & Mayoral, O. (2022).Are traditional lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) landraces valuable to cope with climate change? Effects of drought on growth and biochemical stress markers. Agronomy, 12(7): 1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12071715
36. Marzooghian, A., Moghaddam, M., Valizadeh, M., &Kooshki, M. H. (2012).Genetic diversity of common bean genotypes as revealed by seed storage proteins and some agronomic traits. Plant Breeding and Seed Science, 67: 125-137. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10129-011-0075-1
37. MINITAB.(2014). Minitab statistical software, release 17 for windows[Computer software]. MINITAB Inc., State College.
38. Mohamed, F., Mohamed, M., Schmitz-Eiberger, N., Keutgen, N., & Noga, G. (2005). Comparative drought postponing and tolerance potentials of two tepary bean lines in relation to seed yield. African Crop Science Journal, 13(1): 49-60.
39. Mulanya, M. M., Kimani, P. M., Narla, R. D., & Ojwang, P. O. (2019). Genetic inheritance of photoperiod sensitivity in Runner bean (Phaseolus coccineous L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 13(9): 1511-1519. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.19.13.09.p1784
40. Nadeem, M. A., & Baloch, F. S. (2023). Genome-wide association studies revealed DArTseq loci associated with seed traits in Turkish common bean germplasm. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 47: 479-496.https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.3103
41. Nemli, S., Asciogul, T. K., Kaya, H. B., Kahraman, A., Eşiyok, D., & Tanyolac, B. (2014). Association mapping for five agronomic traits in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94(15): 3141-3151. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6664
42. Nurmansyah, N., Alghamdi, S. S.,Migdadi, H. M., Khan, M. A., & Afzal, M. (2020). AFLP-based analysis of variation and population structure in mutagenesis induced faba bean. Diversity, 12(8): 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12080303
43. Omae, H., Kumar, A., & Shono, M. (2012). Adaptation to high temperature and water deficit in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) during the reproductive period. Journal of Botany, 2012: 803413. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/803413
44. Papathanasiou, F., Ninou, E., Mylonas, I., Baxevanos, D., Papadopoulou, F., Avdikos, I., Sistanis, I., Koskosidis, A., Vlachostergios, D. N., Stefanou, S., Tigka, E., & Kargiotidou, A. (2022). The evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under water stress based on physiological and agronomic parameters. Plants, 11(18): 2432.https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182432
45. Paredes, M., Becerra, V., & Tay, J. (2009). Inorganic nutritional composition of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes race Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 69(4): 486-495. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392009000400002
46. Pineda Ivars, M., Galdón Rodríguez, B., Álvarez Paiz, N., Morales Afonso, D., Mesa Ríos, D., Romero Díaz, C., & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, E. M. (2023). Physico-chemical and nutritional characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Germplasm. Legume Research, 46(3): 273-280. https://doi.org/10.18805/LRF-715
47. Porch, T. G. (2006). Application of stress indices for heat tolerance screening of common bean. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 192: 390–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00229.x
48. Porch, T., & Jahn, M. (2001). Effects of high-temperature stress on microsporogenesis in heat-sensitive and heat-tolerant genotypes of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Cell& Environment, 24: 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00716.x
49. Porch, T. G., Beaver, J. S., Debouck, D. G., Jackson, S. A., Kelly J. D., & Dempewolf, H. (2013). Use of wild relatives and closely related species to adapt common bean to climate change. Agronomy, 3(2): 433-461. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3020433
50. Purwanti, E., & Fauzi, A. (2019). The morphological characteristics of Phaseolus lunatus L. in different areas of East Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 276(1), 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/276/1/012017
51. Rainey, K. M., & Griffiths, P. D. (2005). Evaluation of Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray plant introductions under high temperatures in a controlled environment. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52(2): 117-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-004-1811-2
52. Reddy Rajasekhar, B., Pandey, M., Singh, J., Singh, P. M., & Rai, N. (2024). Principal component analysis and stability of genotypes in french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Research, 47(5): 745-750. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4569
53. Rosario-Arellano Del J.L., Iglesias-Rojas N. G., Tencos-Muñoz L. C., Ugalde-Acosta F. J., Andrés-Meza P., Verdejo-Lara R. A., Leyva-Ovalle O. R., Rosario-Arellano Del J., Serna-Lagunes R., & Murguía-González J. (2025). Variability in morphometric and agronomic traits of native bean seeds (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and edaphoclimatic characterization. Legume Research, 48(1): 64-74. https://doi.org/10.18805/LRF-826
54. Sadeghi, A., Cheghamirza, K., & Dorri, H. R. (2011). The study of morphoagronomic traits relationship in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Biharean Biologist, 5(2): 102-108.
55. Shankar, T. U., Semwal, D. P., Gupta, V., Archak, S., Nair, R. M., & Tripathi, K. (2023).Spatial distribution, diversity mapping, and gap analysis of wild Vigna species conserved in India’s National Genebank. Diversity, 15(4): 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15040552
56. Smart, J. (1992). Phaseolus vulgaris L. In L. J. G. van der Maesen & S. Somaatmadja (Eds.), Plant Resources of South-East Asia (pp. 60-63). Pudoc/Prosea, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
57. Singh, M., Bisht, I. S., & Dutta, M. (2014). Introduction. InM. Singh, I. Bisht, &M. Dutta. (Eds), Broadening the Genetic Base of Grain Legumes. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2023-7_1
58. Sinkovič, L., Pipan, B., Sinkovič, E., & Meglič, V. (2019).Morphological seed characterization of common (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and runner (Phaseolus coccineus L.) bean germplasm: A Slovenian gene bank example. BioMed Research International, 2019: 6376948. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6376948
59. Small, E. (2014). 45. Tepary Bean–an ideal arid zone crop. Biodiversity, 15(2-3): 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2014.903203
60. Spataro, G., Tiranti, B., Arcaleni, P., Bellucci, E., Attene, G., Papa, R., Spagnoletti, P., Zeuli, P., & Negri, V. (2011). Genetic diversity and structure of a worldwide collection of Phaseolus coccineus L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 122(7): 1281-1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1530-y
61. Suárez, J. C., Contreras, A. T., Anzola, J. A., Vanegas, J. I., & Rao, I. M. (2021a). Physiological characteristics of cultivated tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray) and its wild relatives grown at high temperature and acid soil stress conditions in the Amazon region of Colombia. Plants, 11(1): 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010116
62. Suárez, J. C., Urban, M. O., Contreras, A. T., Grajales, M. Á., Cajiao, C., Beebe, S. E., & Rao, I. M. (2021b). Adaptation of interspecific mesoamerican common bean lines to acid soils and high temperature in the Amazon region of Colombia. Plants, 10(11), 2412. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112412
63. Stefanov, D., Petkova, V., & Denev, I. D. (2011). Screening for heat tolerance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines and cultivars using jip-test. Scientia Horticulturae, 128(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.12.003
64. Tene, T. M., Sari, H., Canci, H., Maaruf, A., Eker, T., & Toker, C. (2023). Traits related to heat stress in Phaseolus species. Agriculture, 13(5): 953. https://doi.org./10.3390/agriculture13050953
65. Tene, T. M., Eker, T., Canci, H., Babacan, U., Cengiz, M. F., & Toker, C. (2025). Star of biochemical traits of heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive Phaseolus genotypes in coping with heat stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 105: 1511-1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-025-01340-4
66. Tigist, S. G., Sibiya, J., Amelework, A., & Keneni, G. (2023).Agromorphological and physiological performance of Ethiopian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under different agroecological conditions. Plants, 12(12), 2342. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122342
67. Toker, C. (2004). Evaluation of selection criteria using phenotypic and factor analysis in chickpea. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica,Section B- Soil& Plant Science, 54: 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710310022023
68. Toker, C., & Cagirgan, M. I. (2004). The use of phenotypic correlations and factor analysis in determining characters for grain yield selection in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Hereditas, 140: 226-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01781.x
69. Toker, C., Canci, H., & Yildirim, T. (2007).Evaluation of perennial wild Cicer species for drought resistance. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54: 1781-1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-006-9197-y
70. Türkan, I., Bor, M., Özdemir, F., & Koca, H. (2005). Differential responses of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in the leaves of drought-tolerant P. acutifolius Gray and drought-sensitive P. vulgaris L. subjected to polyethylene glycol mediated water stress. Plant Science, 168(1): 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.032
71. UPOV, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants.(2005). French bean.International union for the protection of new varieties of plants, Geneva.
72. Yeken, M. Z., Kantar, F., Çancı, H., Özer, G.,& Çiftçi, V. (2018a). Breeding of dry bean cultivars using phaseolus vulgaris landraces in Turkey. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1): 45-54. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.408794
73. Yeken, M. Z., Akpolat, H., Karaköy, T., & Çiftçi, V. (2018b). Assessment of mineral content variations for biofortification of the bean seed. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2): 261-269. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.455311
74. Yeken, M. Z., Özer, G., Çelik, A., & Çiftçi, V. (2018c). Türkiye'de ticari fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) çeşitlerinde bean common mosaic virus ve bean common mosaic necrosis virus etmenlerine dayanıklılıkla ilişkili genlerin karakterizasyonu. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(4): 613–619. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.471371
75. Vázquez, V., Patricia, M. L., MuruagaMartínez, J. S., MayekPérez, N., PérezGuerrero, A., &Ramírez-Sánchez, S. E. (2014). Characterization of the runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus L.) of the trans-Mexican Neovolcanic belt and Sierra Madre oriental. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 5(2): 191-200.
76. WOS, Web of Science. (2023, August 16).https://www.webofscience.com/wos/wosc/summary/fcf5bfed-873e-41dc-8c-7c-03984f932bf9-9e239b96/relevance/1