Research Article

Mitigation of Salinity Stress on Chickpea Germination by Salicylic Acid Priming

Volume: 6 Number: 3 December 21, 2020
EN TR

Mitigation of Salinity Stress on Chickpea Germination by Salicylic Acid Priming

Abstract

Salinity is a global problem that threatens chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivation in all stages from germination to maturity. Also, salt-affected areas in the World are increasing by the day. Germination is one of the primary stages affecting plant growth and seed yield. Thus, germination performance of seeds has a vital role in vegetative and productive stages. Seed priming, a cheap and easily applicable technique, improves the germination performance by regulating enzymatic reactions and controlling water intake. Seed priming is controlled hydration of seeds soaked in a solution that has low osmotic potential to start the germination metabolism without elongation of radical. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of different priming treatments on germination traits of chickpea under saline conditions. Three levels of salinity (control, 50 mM and 100 mM NaCl) and 5 priming treatments (non-primed, hydro-priming, 0.1 mM, 0.2 mM and 0.3 mM salicylic acid) were used in the study. Germination percentage (GP), mean germination time (MGT), germination rate (GR), germination index (GI) and coefficient of uniformity of germination (CUG) were varied between 80.7-98.3%, 1.40-2.67 day, 38.1-75.7, 37.5-72.5 and 0.3-0.7, respectively. Although all treatments caused significant positive effects, the 0.2 mM SA mostly improved the germination traits in the study. Also, it was determined that 0.2 mM salicylic acid priming is the threshold for chickpea and higher concentrations have inhibitory effects on the germination process.

Keywords

References

  1. Aflaki, F., Sedghi, M., Pazuki, A., & Pessarakli, M. (2017). Investigation of seed germination indices for early selection of salinity tolerant genotypes: A case study in wheat. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 29(3), 222-226.
  2. Anonymous. (2020). Registry properties of Çakır chickpea cultivar. Available at: https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/gktaem/Belgeler/Tescilli%20%C3%87e%C5%9Fitlerimiz/Nohut/cakir.pdf. Access date: June 10, 2020.
  3. Asadi, M., Heidari, M. A., Kazemi, M., & Filinejad, A. R. (2013). Salicylic acid induced changes in some physiological parameters in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under salt stress. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 9(2), 311-316.
  4. Azarnia, M., Biabani, A., Eisvand, H. R., Alamdari, E. G., & Safikhani, S. (2016). Effect of seed priming with gibberellic acid and salicylic acid on germination characteristic and seed and seedlings physiological quality of lentil (Lens culinaris L.). Iranian Journal of Seed Research, 3(1), 59-72.
  5. Bouallegue, A., Soissi, F., Nouairi, I., Souibgui, M., Abbes, Z., & Mhadhbi, H. (2017). Salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide pretreatments alleviate salt stress in faba bean (Vicia faba) seeds during germination. Seed Science and Technology, 45(3), 675-690.
  6. Boukraa, D., Benabdelli, K., Belabid, L., & Bennabi, F. (2013). Effect of salinity on chickpea seed germination pre-treated with salicylic acid. Scientific Journal of Biological Sciences, 2(4), 86-93.
  7. Cha-Um, S., & Kirdmanee, C. (2010). Effect of glycine betaine on proline, water use, and photosynthetic efficiencies, and growth of rice seedlings under salt stress. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 34, 517-527.
  8. Chen, T., Pineda, I. M. G., Brand, A. M., & Stützel, H. (2020). Determining ion toxicity in cucumber under salinity stress. Agronomy, 10(5), 667.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Botany , Agronomy

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 21, 2020

Submission Date

July 28, 2020

Acceptance Date

September 25, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 6 Number: 3

APA
Ceritoğlu, M., & Erman, M. (2020). Mitigation of Salinity Stress on Chickpea Germination by Salicylic Acid Priming. Uluslararası Tarım Ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(3), 582-591. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.774969

Cited By

17365       17368               17366