Computer-Aided Argument Mapping for Improving Critical Thinking: Think Better! Discuss Better! Write Better!

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the impacts of the use of computer-aided argument maps as a tool to promote prospective teachers’ critical thinking skills and dispositions. In this regard, qualitative research method was used in the study. The data of the research were collected through semi-structured interviews. Study group consists of 30 senior prospective teachers from three different classes studying science teaching at a university in Turkey in 2017-2018 academic year. At these three classes mentioned, individual and collaborative argument maps were created in addition to the ABI (Argumentation-based inquiry) activities. The study group was formed on a volunteer basis with 10 students from each class who were selected from, their course performances into consideration. A computer software was used to create the argument maps. Data obtained from interviews were analyzed through NVIVO program. The results obtained indicated that critical thinking skill sub-dimensions such as explanation, analysis, interpretation, evaluation, Self-correction and critical thinking disposition sub-dimensions such as questioning the reliability of sources, being open and fair-minded, being respectful of differences were emphasized more in the group in which the prospective teachers performed computer-aided, individual and collaborative mapping rather than the group in which only ABI activities were performed.

Keywords

• Argument map
• Argumentation Based Inqiry
• Critical Thinking Skill and Disposition
• Argumentation

References

1. Akgun, A., & Duruk, U. (2016). The investigation of preservice science teachers' critical thinking dispositions in the context of personal and social factors. Science Education International, 27(1), 3-15.
2. Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 65-83.
3. Allen, M., Berkowitz, S., Hunt, S., & Louden, A. (1999). A meta‐analysis of the impact of forensics and communication education on critical thinking. Communication Education, 48(1), 18-30.
4. Can, Ş., & Kaymakçı, G. (2015). Pre-service teacher’s critical thinking tendencies. Education Sciences, 10(2), 66-83.
5. Charness, N., Tuffiash, M., Krampe, R., Reingold, E., & Vasyukova, E. (2005). The role of deliberate practice in chess expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 151-165.
6. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2017). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
7. Çakırlar-Altuntaş, E., Yılmaz, M., & Turan, S. L. (2017). An investigation on critical thinking tendencies of pre-service biology teachers. Ege Journal of Education, 19(1), 34-45
8. Çevik, S. (2013). An investigation of the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service teachers at a private non-profit university. Doctoral dissertation, Bilkent University, Ankara.

9. Çınar, İ. (2009). Küreselleşme, eğitim ve gelecek[Globalization, education and the future]. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 2(1).
10. Darabi, A., Liang, X., Suryavanshi, R., & Yurekli, H. (2013). Effectiveness of online discussion strategies: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 228-241.
11. Davies, M. (2011). Introduction to the special issue on critical thinking in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 255-260.
12. Davies, M. (2013). Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 529-544.
13. Demirci, C. (2000). Critical Thinking. Ankara: Eğitim ve Bilim, Türk Eğitim Derneği, 115, 25.
14. Deniz, E., & Kaptan, F. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarinin eleştirel düşünme beceri düzeyleri üzerine bir inceleme. Cagdas Egitim Dergisi, (389).
15. Donohue, A., van Gelder, T., Cumming, G., & Bissett, M. (2002). Reason! project studies 1999–2002. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
16. Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York: Freeman.
17. Ennis, R. (1991). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching philosophy, 14(1), 5-24.
18. Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The delphi report). Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press; 1990.
19. Fadel, C. (2008). 21st Century Skills: How can you prepare students for the new global economy. Paris: OECD.
20. Retrieved February, 20, 2019. http://www.aacc.nche.edu/Resources/aaccprograms/ate/conf2010/Documents/NSF%20ATE%20-%2021stCS%20-%20STEM%20-%20Charles%20Fadel.pdf
21. Freeley, A.J. & Steinberg, D.L (2000). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22. Grosser, M.M., & Lombard, B.J.J. (2008). The relationship between culture and the development of critical thinking abilities of prospective teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1364-1375.
23. Hand, B., & Keys, C.W. (1999). Inquiry investigation. The Science Teacher, 66(4), 27.
24. Hand, B., Shelley, M.C., Laugerman, M., Fostvedt, L., & Therrien, W. (2018). Improving critical thinking growth for disadvantaged groups within elementary school science: A randomized controlled trial using the Science Writing Heuristic approach. Science Education, 102(4), 693-710.
25. Halpern, D.F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American psychologist, 53(4), 449.
26. Harrell, M. (2011). Argument diagramming and critical thinking in introductory philosophy. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 371-385.
27. Hayırsever, F., & Oğuz, E. (2017). Effect of teacher candidates’ educational beliefs on their critical thinking tendencies. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 17 (2), 757-778.
28. Higher Education Council (2011). Turkey higher education qualifications framework. Last accessed November 3, 2019, http://tyyc.yok.gov.tr.
29. Ioannou, A., Demetriou, S., & Mama, M. (2014). Exploring factors influencing collaborative knowledge construction in online discussions: Student facilitation and quality of initial postings. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(3), 183-195.
30. Jang, J.Y., & Nam, J. (2013). Examining the relationship between a structured reading framework and students' critical thinking ability within an argument-based inquiry approach. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 33(3), 569-580.
31. Janssen, E.M., Mainhard, T., Buisman, R.S., Verkoeijen, P.P., Heijltjes, A.E., van Peppen, L.M., & van Gog, T. (2019). Training higher education teachers’ critical thinking and attitudes towards teaching it. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 310-322.
32. Keys, C.W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084.
33. Korkmaz, Ö. (2009). Teachers’ critical thinking level and dispositions. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 10(1), 1-13.
34. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16-46.
35. Kürüm, D. (2002). Critical thinking abilities of teacher trainees. (Master's thesis, Anadolu University).
36. Lee, M., Kim, H., & Kim, M. (2014). The effects of Socratic questioning on critical thinking in web-based collaborative learning. Education as Change, 18(2), 285-302.
37. McMillan, J.H. (1987). Enhancing college students' critical thinking: a review of studies. Research in Higher Education, 26(1), 3-29.
38. Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2017). General Competencies for Teaching Profession. Retrieved December 3, 2019 from https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretmenlik-meslegi-genel-yeterlikleri/icerik/39
39. Oh, E., & Kim, H. (2016). Understanding cognitive engagement in online discussion: Use of a scaffolded, audio-based argumentation activity. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL, 17(5), 28-48.
40. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2017). Partnership for 21st century skills. Retrieved December 3, 2019 from http://www.p21.org/
41. Paul, R.W., Elder, L., & Bartell, T. (1997). California teacher preparation for instruction in critical thinking: Research findings and policy recommendations. California Commission of Teacher Credentialing, Sacramento, CA (1997)
42. Plant, E.A., Ericsson, K.A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 96-116.
43. Reimold, M., Slifstein, M., Heinz, A., Mueller-Schauenburg, W., & Bares, R. (2006). Effect of spatial smoothing on t-maps: arguments for going back from t-maps to masked contrast images. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 26(6), 751-759.
44. Roviati, E., Widodo, A., Purwianingsih, W., & Riandi, R. (2019, February). Prospective biology teachers’ critical thinking skills in microbiology argument-based inquiry laboratory activities. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157 (2), 022108. IOP Publishing.
45. Sears, A., & Parsons, J. (1991). Towards critical thinking as an ethic. Theory & Research in Social Education, 19(1), 45-68.
46. ter Berg, T., van der Brugge, E., & Cullen, S. (2013). Teaching critical thinking with rationale. In 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. Toulmin, S.E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47. Tufan, D. (2008). Critical thinking skills of prospective teachers: Foreign language education case at the Middle East Technical University. Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
48. Tümkaya, S. (2011). Comparison of college science major students’ learning styles and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 12(3), 215-234. Twardy, C. (2004). Argument maps improve critical thinking. Teaching Philosophy, 27(2), 95-116.
49. Uluçınar, U. (2012). Prediction levels of preservice teachers' critical thinking dispositions on democratic values. Master’s thesis, Osman Gazi University, Eskişehir.
50. van Gelder, T. (2001). A Reason! Able approach to critical thinking. Principal Matters: The Journal for Australasian Secondary School Leaders, May 2002: 34–36, 2001.
51. van Gelder, T., Bissett, M., & Cumming, G. (2004). Cultivating expertise in informal reasoning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 58(2), 142.
52. van Opstal, M.T., & Daubenmire, P.L. (2015). Extending students’ practice of metacognitive regulation skills with the science writing heuristic. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1089-1112.
53. Voss, J.F., & Means, M.L. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and Instruction, 1(4), 337-350.
54. Wagner III, J.A., Leana, C.R., Locke, E.A., & Schweiger, D. M. (1997). Cognitive and motivational frameworks in US research on participation: a meta‐analysis of primary effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 18(1), 49-65.
55. Yıldırım, H.İ., & Şensoy, Ö. (2017). Effects of inquiry based learning approach on creative thinking and scientific process skills. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 6 (1), 34 – 46