Küresel Bisiklet Ekosisteminde Dijital Dönüşüm: Uygulamalar ve Beklentiler

Abstract

Alternatif bir hareketlilik biçimi olarak bisiklet, rekreasyon alanlarının ekonomik, kültürel ve sosyal gelişiminde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Teknolojik gelişmeleri yakından takip eden ve kullanan ciddi boş zaman aktivitesi olarak bisiklet kullanıcılarının akıllı şehir beklentilerinin ve bu kapsamda yapılabilecek iyileştirmelerin neler olduğu çalışma kapsamında araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla 4 Mayıs - 23 Haziran 2023 tarihleri arasında Türkiye'nin üç büyük şehrinde (İstanbul, Ankara ve İzmir) bisiklet kullanıcılarıyla 33 derinlemesine yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşmeler İzmir'de yüz yüze ve şehir dışında Zoom üzerinden gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılımcılar akıllı bisikletçilerin temel özelliklerini genç, çevre dostu, eğlenceli, sosyal, yeniliklere açık, sportif, teknolojiye meraklı, cesur, rekabetçi ve zamanı verimli kullanan olarak tanımlamışlardır. Ayrıca bisiklet kullanıcılarının akıllı şehirlerden beklentilerini; entegre kamu sistemleri, çevresel uygulamalar, özel öneri sistemleri, bisiklet kullanımını teşvik eden uygulamalar, bilgi platformları, akıllı güvenlik uygulamaları ve akıllı turizm yönetimi olmak üzere yedi tematik grupta sıralamak mümkündür. Sonuç olarak, akıllı teknolojilerin dijital deneyim elde etme, küresel ekosistemin bir parçası olma, yeni fırsatlar sunma, bisiklet kullanımının yaygınlaşmasında bisiklet deneyimlerini zenginleştirdiği ve çarpan etkisi yarattığı tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

• Ciddi Boş Zaman Aktivitesi
• Bisiklet
• Akıllı Şehirler
• Akıllı Şehir Teknolojileri
• Akıllı Bisiklet Kullanıcıları

Digital Transformation in the Global Cycling Ecosystem: Applications and Expectations

Abstract

As an alternative mode of mobility, cycling plays a significant role in the economic, cultural, and social development of recreational areas. The study investigated the smart city expectations of leisure cyclists who closely follow and utilize technological advancements as a significant leisure activity, and explored potential improvements within this scope. To this aim, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 cyclists in Turkey's three metropolitan cities (Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir) from May 4th to June 23rd, 2023. The interviews took place face-to-face in Izmir and for participants located outside the city via Zoom. Participants described smart cyclists as young, environmentally friendly, social, open to innovation, sporty, tech-savvy, brave, competitive, and time-efficient individuals. Furthermore, the expectations of cyclists from smart cities could be categorized into seven thematic groups: integrated public systems, environmental applications, specialized recommendation systems, applications promoting cycling, information platforms, smart security applications, and smart tourism management. As a result, it was found that smart technologies enrich cycling experiences and generate a multiplier effect in promoting widespread bicycle use by providing digital experiences, being part of the global ecosystem and offering new opportunities.

Keywords

• Serious leisure activity
• Bicycle
• Smart Cities
• Smart City Technologies
• Smart Cyclists

References

1. Abu-Sharkh, O. M. F., ve Dabain, Z. (2016). Greenbikenet: An intel- ligent mobile application with green wireless networking for cycling in smart cities. Mobile Networks and Applications, 21(2), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-015-0652-x
2. Antoschin, R., ve Wimmer, M. A. (2021). Smart cities: Practitioners’ understanding and expectations: results from a qualitative study in the city of Koblenz. In 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2021), October 06-08, 2021, Athens, Greece. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9 Pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494309
3. Anowar, S., Eluru, N., ve Hatzopoulou, M. (2017). Quantifying the value of a clean ride: How far would you bicycle to avoid exposure to traffic-related air pollution? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 105, 66–78.
4. Arsenio, E., ve Ribeiro, P. (2015). The economic assessment of health benefits of active transport. Transp. Sustain. 7, 1–22.
5. Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., ve Wareham, J. (2013). A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9
6. Behrendt, F. (2016). Why cycling matters for smart cities. Internet of bicycles for intelligent transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.08.018
7. Bıyık, C. (2019). Smart cities in Turkey: Approaches, advances and applications with greater consideration for future urban transport development. Energies 2019, 12, 2308. https://doi.org10.3390/en12122308
8. Boes, K., Buhalis, D., ve Inversini, A. (2016). Smart tourism destinations: ecosystems for tourism destination competitiveness. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 2(2), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-12-2015-0032

9. Brown, T., O'Connor, J., ve Barkatsas, A. (2009). Instrumentation and motivations for organised cycling: The development of the cyclist motivation instrument (CMI). Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 8, 211-8.
10. Buhalis, D., ve Amaranggana, A. (2014) Smart tourism destinations. In Z. Xiang & I. Tussyadiah (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2014 (pp. 553–564). Dublin:Springer.
11. Cohen, B. (2012, 22 Haziran). Smart cities hub. http://smartcitieshub.com/2012/11/11/smart-cities-ranking-methodology/
12. Cox P. (2005) Conflicting agendas in selling cycling’ paper presented to Velo-City conference. Dublin: Delivering The Vision Dublin: Department of Transport, Dublin, European Cyclists Federation and National Development Plan.
13. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma tasarımı: Beş yaklaşım. Sage Publications.
14. Dorcic, J., Komsic, J., ve Markovic, S. (2018) Mobile technologies and applications towards smart tourism – state of the art. Tourism Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-07-2017-0121
15. Dudycz, H. & Piatkowski, I. (2018). Smart mobility solutions in public transport based on analysis chosen smart cities. Business Information, 2, 19–35.
16. Egger, R. (2013). The impact of near field communication on tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, IV(2), 119–133.
17. Gretzel, U., Werthner, H., Koo, C., ve Lamsfus, C. (2015). Conceptual foundations for understanding smart tourism ecosystems. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 558–563.
18. Habib, A., Alsmadi, D., ve Prybutok, V. R. (2020) Factors that determine residents’ acceptance of smart city Technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(6), 610-623. https://doi.org.10.1080/0144929X.2019.1693629
19. Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszcza, J., ve Williams, P. (2010). Foundations For Smarter Cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 4, 1-16.
20. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up?, City, 12(3), 303-320, https://doi.org.10.1080/13604810802479126
21. Huang, C. D., Goo, J., Nam, K., ve Yoo, C. W. (2017). Smart tourism technologies in travel planning: The role of exploration and exploitation. Information & Management, 54(6), 757-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.11.010
22. Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International.
23. Meireles, M., ve Ribeiro, P. J. G. (2020). Digital platform/mobile app to boost cycling for the promotion of sustainable mobility in mid-sized starter cycling cities. Sustainability, 12(5), 20-64. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052064
24. Nam, T., ve Pardo, T. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and ınstitutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 282-291.
25. Neuhofer, B., Buhalis, D., ve Ladkin, (2015). Smart technologies for personalized experiences: a case study in the hospitality domain. Electron Markets. 25, 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0182-1
26. Nikolaeva, A., te Brömmelstroet, M., Raven, R., ve Ranson, J. (2019). Smart cycling futures: Charting a new terrain and moving towards a research agenda. Journal of Transport Geography, 79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102486
27. O'Connor, J. P., ve Brown, T.D. (2007). Real cyclists' don't race: informal affiliations of the weekend warrior. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 42(1), 83-97.
28. Oliveira, F., Nery, D., Costa, D. G., Silva, I., ve Lima, L. (2021). A survey of technologies and recent developments for sustainable smart cycling. Sustainability, 13(6), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063422
29. Qin, M., Tang, C.H., Jang, S. ve Lehto, X. (2017). Mobile app introduction and shareholder returns. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31 (June), 173-180.
30. Rivers, D. J. (2020). Strava as a discursive field of practice: Technological affordances and mediated cycling motivations. Discourse, Context & Media, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100345
31. Savastano, M., Suciu, M-C., Gorelova, I. & Stativă, G-A. (2023). How smart is mobility in smart cities? An analysis of citizens' value perceptions through ICT applications. Cities, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104071
32. Shin, H. H., Jeong, M., ve Cho, M. H. (2021). The impact of smart tourism technology and domestic travelers' technology readiness on their satisfaction and behavioral intention: A cross-country comparison. International Journal of Tourism Research, 23(5), 726-742. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2437
33. Stebbins, R.A., (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, QC and Kingston, ON.
34. Stebbins, R. (2016). Serbest Zaman Fikri: Temel İlkeler. (M. Demirel, N. Ekinci, Ü. Üstün, U. Işık, O. Gümüşgül, Çev.) Ankara: Spor Yayınevi ve Kitabevi
35. Tekin, H. (2012). Nitel araştırma yönteminin bir veri toplama tekniği olarak derinlemesine görüşme. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(13):101-116.
36. Veillette, P., Grisé, E., ve El-Geneidy A. (2018). Park ‘n’ Roll: Identifying and prioritizing locations for new bicycle parking in Québec City, Canada. Transp. Res. Rec. 2672, 73–82.
37. Yeh, H. (2017). The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: from citizens’ perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq. 2017.05.001
38. Yuan, Y., ve Chen, W. (2021). Design and development of embedded system of portable bicycle exerciser. Microprocess. Microsyst, 81(2021).
39. Zhang, Y., Wen, H., Qiu, F., Wang, Z., ve Abbas, H. (2019). iBike: Intelligent public bicycle services assisted by data analytics. Future Generation Computer Systems, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.12.017