Character Strengths in Turkey: Initial Adaptation Study of Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth (VIA-Youth) and Life Satisfaction in Young People

Abstract

The character strengths and virtues approach is a classification system to examine the characteristics of good character in terms of twenty-four strengths and six virtues. This study was designed to investigate the psychometric properties regarding the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the VIA-Youth. A tool developed to evaluate the character strengths of youth. In addition, character strengths were examined in terms of life satisfaction, values and demographic characteristics. 1963 high school students between 14-19 years participated in this study by completing VIA-Youth and the Human Values and Life Satisfaction inventories. The results confirm the six-factor model in the theoretical framework. It has also been concluded that character strengths affect life satisfaction and values and that socio demographic features are related to strengths. The adaptation of this inventory into Turkish culture contributes to the current understanding of the universal aspects of character strengths for studies within the context of positive youth development. Besides the adaptation, the relationships between character strengths, values, demographic characteristics and life satisfaction were discussed and suggestions were made.

Keywords

• Character strengths,virtues,Turkish VIA-youth,values,life satisfaction

References

1. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Hannah, S. T., Sweetman, D., & Peterson, C. (2012). Impact of employees’ character strengths of wisdom on stress and creative performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(2), 165-181.
2. Balzarotti, S., John, O.P., & Gross, J.J. (2010). An italian adaptation of the emotion regulation questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 61–67.
3. Biswas-Diener, R. (2006). From the equator to the North Pole: A study of character strengths. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 293–310.
4. Brdar, I., Anić, P., & Rijavec, M. (2011). Character strengths and well-being: Are there gender differences? In I. Brdar (Ed.), The human pursuit of well-being: A cultural approach (pp. 145-156). New York, NY: Springer.
5. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with Lisrel, Prelis, and Simplis: Basic concepts applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Dahiya, T.S. (2013). Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the values in action-inventory of strength (youth) for the Hindi speaking Indian youth in the age range of 10 to 17. Indian Streams Research Journal, 3(7), 1-5.
7. Dahlsgaard, K. K. (2005). Is virtue more than its own reward?: Character strengths and their relation to well-being in a prospective, longitudinal study of middle school-aged adolescents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA.
8. Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.

9. Dilmac, B. (2007). The assesment of the teaching of humane values which are imposed a group of science high school students by humane values scale (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
10. Dossett, T. H. (2011). The influence of the character strengths of gratitude and kindness on subjective well-being (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, USA.
11. Erkus, A. (2012). Psikolojide olcme ve olcek gelistirme-1 temel kavramlar ve islemler [Measurement and scale development in psychology-1 basic concepts and processes]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
12. Furnham, A., & Lester, D. (2012). The development of a short measure of character strength. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(2), 95-101.
13. Gillham, J., Adams-Deutsch, Z., Werner, J., Reivich, K., Coulter-Heindl, V., Linkins, M. ... Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Character strengths predict subjective well-being during adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 31-44.
14. Gradisek, P. (2012). Character strengths and life satisfaction of Slovenian in-service and pre-service teachers. CEPS Journal, 2(3), 167-180.
15. Gusewell, A., & Ruch, W. (2012). Are only emotional strengths emotional? Character strengths and disposition to positive emotions. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 4(2), 218-239.
16. Hutchinson, A. K., Stuart, A. D., & Pretorius, H. G. (2010). Biological contributions to well-being: The relationships amongst temperament, character strengths and resilience. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1-10.
17. Kline, R. B. (2010). Promise and pitfalls of structural equation modeling in gifted research. In R. E. Subotnik ve B. Thompson (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting on giftedness (pp. 147-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Koker, S. (1991). Normal ve sorunlu ergenlerin yasam doyumu duzeyinin karsilastirilmasi [Comparison of life satisfaction levels of normal and problematic adolescents](Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
19. Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., Peterson, C. et. al. (2007). Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The via inventory of strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 341–351.
20. Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 321-349.
21. Macdonald, C., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2008). Values in action scale and the Big 5: An empirical indication of structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 787-799.
22. Niemiec, R. M. (2013). VIA character strengths: Research and practice (The first 10 years). In H. H. Knoop & A. Delle Fave (Eds.), Well-being and cultures: Perspectives from positive psychology, cross-cultural advancements in positive psychology 3, (pp. 11-29). New York, NY: Springer.
23. Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well–being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603-619.
24. Park, N. (2004). Character Strengths and Positive Youth Development. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 40-54.
25. Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006a). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 891–909.
26. Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006b). Character strengths and happiness among young children: Content analysis of parental descriptions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 323–341.
27. Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). The values in action inventory of character strengths for youth. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 13–23). New York, NY: Springer.
28. Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2004). Classification and measurement of character strengths: Implications for practice. In P. Alex Linley ve S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 433-446). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
29. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 17–26.
30. Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beerman, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3), 149-156.
31. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues a handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32. Proctor, C., Maltby, J., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths use as a predictor of well-being and health-related quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(1), 153-169.
33. Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wyss, T., & Ruch, W. (2011). The relation of character strengths to past, present, and future life satisfaction among German-speaking women. Applied Psychology: Health And Well-Being, 3(3), 370-384.
34. Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS) adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31(3), 138-149.
35. Seider, S., Gilbert, J., Novick, S., & Gomez, J. (2013). The role of moral and performance character strengths in predicting achievement and conduct among urban middle school students. Teachers College Record, 115(8), 1-18.
36. Shryack, J., Steger, M.F., Krueger, R.F., & Kallie, C. S. (2010). The structure of virtue: An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the virtues in action inventory of strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(6), 714-719.
37. Singh, K., & Choubisa, R. (2010). Empirical validation of values in-action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) in Indian context. Psychological Studies, 55(2), 151-158.
38. Steen, T. A., Kachorek, L. V., & Peterson, C. (2003). Character strengths among youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(1), 5–16.
39. Sencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranissal olcumlerde guvenilirlik ve gecerlilik [Reliability and validity in social and behavioral measurements]. Ankara, Turkey: Seckin.
40. Tavsancil, E. (2002). Tutumlarin olculmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel.
41. Thun, B., & Kelloway, E. K. (2011). Virtuous leaders: Assessing character strengths in the workplace. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28(3), 270-283.
42. Toner, E., Haslam, N. Robinson, J., & Williams, P. (2012). Character strengths and wellbeing in adolescence: Structure and correlates of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Children. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 637–642.
43. Van Eeden, C., Wissing, M. P., Dreyer, J. Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2008). Validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth (VIA-Youth) among South African learners. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18(1), 143-154.