The Adaptation of Language Learning Curiosity Scale into Turkish Language
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to adapt the original language learning curiosity scale into the Turkish language. The concept of curiosity has been explained in many types and scopes. Language curiosity comprises two main curiosity types reflecting as a feeling of interest and deprivation (Litman, 2007; Litman & Jimerson, 2004; Mahmoodzadeh & Khajavy, 2019). The data was collected from 670 volunteer middle school students who live in Ankara, Turkey. The 6 point Likert-type original scale has 11 items with two subscales related to the feeling of interest (1, 4, 9, 11. items) and deprivation (2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10. items). Internal consistency of the original full scale and subscales as a feeling of interest and as a feeling of deprivation were proved reliable with the findings of 0.80, 0.74 and 0.72 respectively. CFA of the original scale was performed with a two-factor model which demonstrates well fit indices. After a series of translation process of the scale items into Turkish language, the adapted scale was applied at three middle schools in Ankara. The adapted scale’s descriptive statistics showed similar findings with the original scale results. Internal consistency of the adapted scale and the subscales as a feeling of interest and as a feeling of deprivation were detected .92, .86 and .88 respectively. CFA of the adapted scale was calculated with the same model of the original scale as a two-factor model showed well fit indices. The adapted scale’s two-factor model demonstrated a well fit indices (.94 for CFI, .93 for TLI, .08 for RMSEA and .06 for SRMR) similar to the original one’s findings. These statistical demonstrations prove that the adapted scale items are valid and reliable for the Turkish language and culture with the scope of middle school students in Turkey. The Turkish version of the language learning curiosity scale may be testified for the higher level of students who studies in high schools or colleges with other variables.
Keywords
Language Learning Curiosity , Feeling of Interest , Feeling of Deprivation.
References
- Adıgüzel, C., & TatlıDalioğlu, S. (2015). Study on Turkish adaptation of “new teacher possible selves questionnaire. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 14(53), 173-185.
- Bergh, D. (2015). Chi-Squared Test of Fit and Sample Size-A Comparison between a Random Sample Approach and a Chi-Square Value Adjustment Method. J Appl Meas, 16(2), 204-217.
- Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 180.
- Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Conflict and information-theory variables as determinants of human perceptual curiosity. Journal of experimental psychology, 53(6), 399.
- Berlyne, D. E. (1958). The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. Journal of experimental psychology, 55(3), 289.
- Collins, R. P., Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2004). The measurement of perceptual curiosity. Personality and individual differences, 36(5), 1127-1141.
- Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
- Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press. New York, 748.
- Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
- Hon-Keung, Y., Man-shan, K., & Lai-fong, C. A. (2012). The Impact of Curiosity and External Regulation on Intrinsic Motivation: An Empirical Study in Hong Kong Education. Online Submission, 2(5), 295-307.