Design and Content Validity Analysis of Physics Test based on Local Wisdom for High School Students

Year 2019, Volume: 4 Issue: 4, 602 - 609, 01.10.2019

Nunung Fadilah Mundilarto .

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628426

Abstract

This research was conducted to design the physics test instrument based on local wisdom “Gasing”used in measuring the cognitive skill of the 11th-gradesenior high school students and to analyze the content validity. The question formatof the test is two-tier multiple-choice. The first tier consists of 5 answer choices and the second tier consistsof 5 choices of answer reasons. A methodological study was conducted to examine the content validity of the physics test instrument through atwo-step process (design and judgment). The design stage was conducted through five-steps, including determining the objectives, selecting the appropriate item format, preparing the table of specifications, writing the test items, and editing the test items. At the expert’s judgment stage wasto analyze the content validity obtained from the assessment of six validators (3 lecturers and 3 physics teachers) using the Aiken’s formula. Based on the results of the research showedthat the highest content validity value was oneand the content validity index of 32 items wasabove 0.78. Thus, the physics test instrument based on local wisdom “Gasing” that developed wasvalid and feasible in terms of the validity of its contents.

Keywords

Physics test, local wisdom, , cognitive skills, content validity

References

• Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validty of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142.Astuti, S., & Rahayu, E. N. (2012). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen autentik berbasis literasi sains pada materi sistem ekskresi. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 2(2), 102-110.Asysyifa, D. S., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analysis of students critical thinking skills using partial credit models(PCM) in physics learning. Intenational Journal of Educational Research Review, 4 (2), 245-253.Bowker, R. & Tearle, P. (2007). Gardening as a learning environment: A study of children’s perceptions and understanding of school gardens as part of an international project. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Learning Environ Res, 83-100.Cahyono, N. (2011). Transformasi Permainan Anak Indonesia. http://permainan-nusantaraRetrieved 05 September, 2011.Chartock, R. K. (2010). Strategies and lessons for culturally responsive teaching: A primer for K-12 teacher. Pearson Education: Boston.Eick, C. J. (2012). Use of the outdoor classroom and nature-study to support sciences and literacy learning: a narrative case study of a third-grade classroom.Springer, J Sci Teacher Educ, 23, 789-803.Etkina, E., Heuvelen, A. V., Brahmia, S. W., Brookes, D. T., Gentile, M., Murthy, S., Rosengrant, D., & Warren, A. (2006). Scientific abilities and their assessment. Physical Review Special Topics -Physics Education Research, 020103, 1-15. Fahmi, R. (2017). Pengembangan Model Outdoor Learning melalui Game Berbasis Local Wisdom untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Peserta Didik pada Materi Keseimbangan Benda Tegar.M.Pd. thesis. Pascasarjana Pendidikan Fisika. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Guney, B. G. & Seker, H. (2012). The use of history of science as a cultural tool to promote students’ empathy with the culture of science. Educational consultancy and research center, theory & practice, 12(1), 533-539.Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno. (2014). Penerapan Partial Credit Model pada Tes Pilihan Ganda Termodifikasi Merupakan Alternative Asesmen Fisika yang Adil. Denpasar: Prosiding konferensi Ilmiah Tahunan HEPI tahun 2014.Kenney, J. L., Militana, H. P., & Donohue, M. H. (2003). Helping teachers to use their school’s backyard as an outdoor classroom: a report on the watershed learning center program. The journal of environmental education, 35(1), 18-26.Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res, 2-5.Mitana, J. M. V., Muwagga, A. M., & Ssempala, C. (2019). Assessment for successful ıntelligence: Aparadigm shift in classroom practice.Intenational Journal of Educational Research Review, 4 (1), 106-115.Mungmachon, R. (2012). Knowledge and local wisdom: community treasure. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science,2(13), 174-181.Musanna, A. (2011). Rasionalitas dan aktualitas kearifan lokal sebagaibasis Pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 17(6), 588-598.Oriondo, L. L. & Antonio, E. M. D. (1985). Evaluating educational outcomes (Test, measurment and evaluation). Rex Printing Company: Florentino St.Popov, O. & Tevel, E. (2007). Developing prospective physics teachers’ skills of independent experimental work using outdoors approach. Jurnal of Baltic science education, 6(1), 47-57.Suastra, I. W. & Yasmini, L. P. B. (2013). Model pembelajaran fisika untuk mengembangkan kreativitas berpikir dan karakter bangsa berbasis kearifan lokal Bali. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(2), 221-235.Sudjana, N. (2013). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar.PT. Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung.Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., & Specht, M. (2012). A quest formeta-learning gains in a physics serious game. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 361-374. Vlachopoulos, D. & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: a systematic literature review.International Journal ofEducational Technology in Higher Education, 14(22), 1-33.Wagiran. (2011). Pengembangan model pendidikan kearifan lokal dalam mendukung visi pembangunan provinsi daerah istimewa yogyakarta 2020. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 3(3), 329-339.Waltz, C.F., Strickland, O., & Lenz, E.R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research. 4th ed. Springer Publishing Company: New York.Wu, H. M., Kuo, B. C., & Wang, S. C. (2017). Computerized Dynamic Adaptive Tests with Immediately Individualized Feedback for Primary School Mathematics Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 61-72.Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res, 8-18Yaghmale, F. (2003). Content validity and its estimation.Journal of Medical Education, 5-7