Examination of Natural Science Laboratory Perception Levels of Students at Primary Education Grade 6 and Their Attitudes Towards Laboratory Practices of Natural Science Course

Abstract

Keywords

• -

References

1. Adesoji, A. F., & Raimi, M. S. (2004). Effects of Enhanced Laboratory Instructional Technique on Senior Secondary Students’ Attitude toward Chemistry in Oyo Township, Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3).
2. Akçay, S., Aydoğdu, M., Yıldırım, H. İ., & Şensoy, Ö. (2005). Fen Eğitiminde İlköğretim 6. Sınıflarda Çiçekli Bitkiler Konusunun Öğretiminde Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretimin Öğrenci Başarısına Etkisi [The Effect of Computer Assisted Instruction in Flowery Plant Subject in 6th Grade Students in Science Education on the Success of Student]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 13(1), 103-116.
3. Aladejana, F., & Aderibigbe, O. (2007). Science Laboratory Environment and Academic Performance. Journal of Science Technology Education, 16, 500-506. Alıcıgüzel, İ. (1979). İlk ve Orta Dereceli Okullarda Öğretim. İstanbul: İnkılap ve Aka Press.
4. Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Validity and Worth in the Science Curriculum: Learning School Science Outside the Laboratory. The Curriculum Journal. 17(3), 213–228. Büyükkaragöz, S. S. (1997). Program Geliştirme. 2. Baskı. Konya: Kurucular Ofset.
5. Chang, H., Quintan, C., & Krajcik, J.S. (2010). The Impact of Designing and Evaluating Molecular Animations on How Well Middle School Students Understand the Particulate Nature of Matter. Science Education, 94(1), 73-94.
6. Doğdu, S., & Arslan Z. (1990). Eğitim Teknolojisi Uygulamaları ve Eğitim Araç-Gereçleri. Ankara: Tekışık Web Ofset.
7. Erkuş, A. (2005). Bilimsel Araştırma Sarmalı. Ankara: Seçkin Press. Greenfield, T. A. (1997). Gender and Grade Level Differences in Science Interest and Participation. Science Education, 81(3), 259.
8. Habibe, T. (2006). Lise Kimya Öğretiminde Laboratuar Kullanımına İlişkin Öğrenci Görüşleri [Student Views on the Laboratory Use in High School Chemistry Education]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 31-43.

9. Hançer, A. H., & Yalçın, N. (2007). Fen Eğitiminde Yapılandırmacı Yaklaşıma Dayalı Bilgisayar Destekli Öğrenmenin Bilgisayara Yönelik Tutuma Etkisi [The Effects of Computer Based Learning Based Upon Constructivist Approach in Science Education on Attitudes toward Computer]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 15(2), 549-560.
10. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.
11. Horstman, M., Aldiss, S., Richardson, A., & Gibson, A. (2008). Methodological Issues When Using the Draw and Write Technique with Children Aged 6 to 12 Years. Qualitative Health Research, 18(7), 1001-1011.
12. Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2000). Fizik Öğretiminde Laboratuar Uygulamalarının Yürütülmesinde Karşılaşılan Güçlükler. Türk Fizik Derneği, 19 th Physics Congress, 26-29 September, Fırat University, Elazığ.
13. Klahr, D., & Li, J. (2005). Cognitive Research and Elementary Science Instruction: From the Laboratory, to the Classroom, and Back. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(2), 217-238.
14. Knox, K. L., Moynihan, J. A., & Markowitz, D. G. (2003). Evaluation of Short Term Impact of a High School Summer Science Program on Students’ Perceived Knowledge and Skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(4), 471-478.
15. Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and centers for contemporary teaching. In: Fraser, B. J. and Tobin, K. G. (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Markowitz, D. G. (2004). Evaluation of the Long-Term Impact of a University High School Summer Science Program on Students’ Interest and Perceived Abilities in Science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 395-407.
17. Mckee, E., Williamson, M. V., & Ruebush, E. L. (2007). Effects of a Demonstration Laboratory on Student Learning. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 16(5), 395-400.
18. Orion, N., Hofstein, A., Tamir, T., & Giddings G. J. (1997). Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing the Learning Environment of Outdoor Science Activities. Science Education, 81(2), 161.
19. cy of Hands-On Experimentation and Student Attitudes toward Science: A Statistically Significant Relation. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 15 (3/4), 285-297.
20. Osborne, J. (2003). Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
21. Oskay Özyalçın, Ö., Erdem, E., & Yılmaz, A. (2009). Kimya Laboratuar Uygulamalarının Öğrencilerin Kimyaya Yönelik Tutum ve Başarılarına Etkisi Üzerine Bir Çalışma [A Study about the Effects of Chemistry Laboratory Applications on Students’ Attitudes toward Chemistry and Achievement]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 8(27), 222-321.
22. Ottander, C., & Grelsson, G. (2006). Laboratory Work: The Teachers’ Perspective. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 113-118.
23. Özmen, H. (2001). Kimya Öğretmenliği Öğrencilerinin Laboratuar Uygulamalarında Karşılaştıkları Güçlüklerin Tespiti. Retrieved October 30, 2010, from http://egitim.cukurova.edu.tr/efdergi /makaleler.asp?dosya=185.
24. Taşkın Ekici F., Ekici E., & Taşkın S. (2002). Fen Laboratuarlarının İçinde Bulunduğu Durum, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, 16-18 September, Ankara. Retrieved October 30, 2010, from http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek 5/b_kitabi/PDF/Fen/Bildiri/ t90d.pdf.
25. Tsai, C. C. (2003). Taiwanese Science Students’ And Teachers’ Perceptions Of The Laboratory Learning Environments: Exploring Epistemological Gaps. Internatiınal Journal Science Education, 25(7), 847–860.
26. Tweedy, M. E., & Hoese W. J. (2005). Diffusion activities in college laboratory manuals. Journal of Biological Education, 39(4), 150-155.
27. Uluçınar, Ş., Cansaran, A., & Karaca, A. (2004). Fen Bilimleri Laboratuvar Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilmesi [The Evaluation of Laboratory Studies in Science]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(4), 465-477.
28. Yeşilyurt, S. (2005). Biyoloji Eğitimi Öğrencilerinin Biyoloji Laboratuar Uygulamalarında Karşılaştıkları Güçlüklerin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(30), 88-96.
29. Yeşilyurt, S. (2006). Öğretmen Adayları ve Öğretim Elemanları Gözüyle Genel Biyoloji Lâboratuar Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilmesi [An Investigation on General Biology Laboratory Applications in Terms of The View of Prospective Teachers and Lecturers]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 14(2), 481- 496.
30. Yeşilyurt, M., Kurt, T., & Temur, A. (2005). İlköğretim Fen Laboratuarı İçin Tutum Anketi Geliştirilmesi ve Uygulanması. Pamukkale University Journal of The Faculty of Education, 17, 23-37.