Review Article
BibTex RIS Cite

L’ÉTRANGER STRANGE TO ITS TRANSLATION: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TURKISH TRANSLATION OF L’ÉTRANGER FROM BERMAN’S PERSPECTIVE

Year 2017, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 314 - 323, 30.06.2017

Abstract

Philosophical works are rich resources in terms of ideological aspects and literary inferences. Since these works aim to transmit the philosophical references to readers, original utilizations should be well-preserved in translation. Nevertheless, certain deviations can be observed in the translation of philosophical works due to the individual preferences of the translators, their social environments and cultural, political or ideological background information. Antoine Berman’s translational approach evaluates the possible deviations and deformations in the translation of literary products. Twelve deforming tendencies classified by Berman constitute a solid basis for the evaluation of the translations of philosophical works and the preferences of the translators. Within this context, the present study analyzes the Turkish translation of one of the most well-known philosophical novels, L’Étranger within the scope of Berman’s perspective. This study aims to present a comprehensive case study demonstrating the impacts of the deformations observed in the translations of philosophical works. For this purpose, the study firstly gives brief information on the ideology of Albert Camus, the author of L’Étranger. Secondly, it elaborates Berman’s translational perspective in order to provide a theoretical aspect for the analysis. Thirdly, L’Étranger is briefly introduced, and the examples selected from this novel are analyzed within the scope of Berman’s approach so as to create awareness about the significance of the preservation of philosophical references in the translation.

References

  • Berman, A. (2000). Translation and the Trials of the Foreign. (Trans. Lawrence Venuti). The Translation Studies Reader, London: Routledge. 284-97.
  • Bloom, R. (2012). ‘Lost in Translation: What the First Line of “The Stranger” Should Be’. The New Yorker. Retrieved May 14, 2015 from http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/lost-in-translation-what-the-first-line-of-the-stranger-should-be.
  • Camus, A. (1942). L’Étranger. Paris: Les Éditions Gallimard.
  • Camus, A.(1946). The Stranger. (Trans. Stuart Gilbert). New York: Vintage Books.
  • Camus, A. (1981). Yabancı. (Trans. Vedat Günyol) İstanbul: Can Yayınları.
  • Camus, A. (2014). Biography. A&E Television Networks. Retrieved May 16, 2015 from http://www.biography.com/people/albert-camus-9236690.
  • Demirdeler, N. & Dönmez, E. (2013). Albert Camus’nün Yabancı’sında Saçma Kavramı. KalemKahveKlavye. Retrieved May 13, 2015 from http://www.kalemkahveklavye.com/2013/05/albert-camus-yabanci.html.
  • Ertel, E. (2011). A Testament to Translation Criticism. The Translator. 17 (1). Pp. 137-141.
  • Massardier-Kenney, F. (2010). Antoine Berman’s way-making to translation as a creative and critical act. Translation Studies. 3 (3). Pp. 259-271.
  • Munday, J. (2001). Introducing Translation Studies. New York: Routledge.
  • Naylor, T. H. (2012). Albert Camus: Life is Absurd, Rebél, Live, and Try to Die Happy. Second Vermont Public. Retrieved May 13, 2015 from http://vermontrepublic.org/albert-camus-life-is-absurd-rebel-live-and-try-to-die-happy/.
  • Aronson, R. (2011). Albert Camus. Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved May 15, 2015 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/camus/.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu (n.d). tdk.gov.tr. Retrieved May 14, 2015 from http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_bts&view=bts&kategori1=veritbn&kelimesec=121743.

L’ÉTRANGER STRANGE TO ITS TRANSLATION: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TURKISH TRANSLATION OF L’ÉTRANGER FROM BERMAN’S PERSPECTIVE

Year 2017, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 314 - 323, 30.06.2017

Abstract

References

  • Berman, A. (2000). Translation and the Trials of the Foreign. (Trans. Lawrence Venuti). The Translation Studies Reader, London: Routledge. 284-97.
  • Bloom, R. (2012). ‘Lost in Translation: What the First Line of “The Stranger” Should Be’. The New Yorker. Retrieved May 14, 2015 from http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/lost-in-translation-what-the-first-line-of-the-stranger-should-be.
  • Camus, A. (1942). L’Étranger. Paris: Les Éditions Gallimard.
  • Camus, A.(1946). The Stranger. (Trans. Stuart Gilbert). New York: Vintage Books.
  • Camus, A. (1981). Yabancı. (Trans. Vedat Günyol) İstanbul: Can Yayınları.
  • Camus, A. (2014). Biography. A&E Television Networks. Retrieved May 16, 2015 from http://www.biography.com/people/albert-camus-9236690.
  • Demirdeler, N. & Dönmez, E. (2013). Albert Camus’nün Yabancı’sında Saçma Kavramı. KalemKahveKlavye. Retrieved May 13, 2015 from http://www.kalemkahveklavye.com/2013/05/albert-camus-yabanci.html.
  • Ertel, E. (2011). A Testament to Translation Criticism. The Translator. 17 (1). Pp. 137-141.
  • Massardier-Kenney, F. (2010). Antoine Berman’s way-making to translation as a creative and critical act. Translation Studies. 3 (3). Pp. 259-271.
  • Munday, J. (2001). Introducing Translation Studies. New York: Routledge.
  • Naylor, T. H. (2012). Albert Camus: Life is Absurd, Rebél, Live, and Try to Die Happy. Second Vermont Public. Retrieved May 13, 2015 from http://vermontrepublic.org/albert-camus-life-is-absurd-rebel-live-and-try-to-die-happy/.
  • Aronson, R. (2011). Albert Camus. Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved May 15, 2015 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/camus/.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu (n.d). tdk.gov.tr. Retrieved May 14, 2015 from http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_bts&view=bts&kategori1=veritbn&kelimesec=121743.
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Language Studies (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Tuğçe Elif Taşdan This is me

Publication Date June 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Taşdan, T. E. (2017). L’ÉTRANGER STRANGE TO ITS TRANSLATION: CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TURKISH TRANSLATION OF L’ÉTRANGER FROM BERMAN’S PERSPECTIVE. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 5(2), 314-323.