EFFECT OF GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS ON SOCIAL WELFARE

Year 2018, , 919 - 928, 01.09.2018

Taner Güney

https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2018445662

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of government effectiveness on the level of social welfare in Turkey and EU Member States. Cash benefits, direct in-kind provision of goods and services, and tax breaks with social purposes by the government used as a social welfare indicator in the study which targeted at low-income households, the elderly, disabled, sick, unemployed, or young persons. The estimates obtained by using the SystemGMM method with data from Turkey and 22 EU member states in 1990-2014 indicate that government effectiveness has a positive and statistically significant effect on social welfare in Turkey and EU member states. Accordingly, when government effectiveness increases the level of social welfare of low-income families, elderly, disabled, sick, unemployed or young people is increasing

Keywords

Government Effectiveness, Social Welfare, System-GMM

HÜKÜMET ETKİNLİĞİNİN SOSYAL REFAH DÜZEYİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye ve AB üyesi ülkelerde hükümet etkinliğinin sosyal refah düzeyi üzerindeki etkisini analiz etmektir. Çalışmada sosyal refah göstergesi olarak devletin düşük gelirli ailelere, yaşlılara, engellilere, hasta, işsiz veya genç insanlara yaptığı mal ve hizmet yardımı ile vergi indirimleri kullanılmıştır. Türkiye ve 22 AB üyesi ülkenin 1990-2014 dönemindeki verisiyle Sistem-GMM yöntemi kullanılarak elde edilen tahminler, söz konusu ülkelerde hükümet etkililiğinin, sosyal refah düzeyini pozitif yönlü ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Buna göre hükümet etkililiği arttığında düşük gelirli aileler, yaşlılar, engelliler, hasta, işsiz veya genç bireylerin sosyal refah düzeyi artmaktadır.

Keywords

Hükümet Etkinliği, Sosyal Refah, Sistem-GMM

References

• Anderson, T. W. & Hsiao, C. (1981). Estimation of dynamic models with error components. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(375), 598–606.
• Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
• Arellano, M. & O. Bover (1995). Another look at the ınstrumental variable estimation of error- components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
• Baltagi, Badi H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. Canada: John Wiley & Sons.
• Barr, N. (1987). The economics of welfare state. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press,.
• Barr, N. (1992). Economic theory and the welfare state: A survey and ınterpretation. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(2),741-803.
• Barr, N. (2004). Economics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Barry, N. (1992). Liberty and welfare: Comment on Griggs. Politics, 12(2), 35-37.
• Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
• Briggs, A. (2000). Welfare state in historical perspective. In C. Pierson, F. G. Castels (Eds.), The welfare state reader (pp. 18-31). Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Briggs, A. (1961). The welfare state in historical perspective. European Journal of Sociology, 2(02), 221-258.
• Cameron, A. C. & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics, methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Caruana, C. (2010). Measuring the efficiency and effectiveness of the welfare state: A comparative study of The Eu-27member States. Bank of Valletta Review, 42, 75-106.
• Çevik, H. H. (1998). Kamu hizmetlerinin üretilmesinde ve sunulmasında sosyal refah çoğulculuğu. Türk İdare Dergisi, 418, 109–122.
• Dereli, T. (2002). Introduction to social policy. (Ders Notları), İstanbul.
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Gilbert, N. & Terrell, P. (1998). Dimensions of social welfare policy. Massachusetts: Allyn– Bacon Publication.
• Gough, I. (1989). Welfare state. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (Eds.), Social economics (pp. 276-281). Londra: Palgrave Press.
• Hicks, A. & Esping-Andersen, G. (2005). Comparative and historical studies of public policy and the welfare state. In T. Janoski, R. Alford, A. Hicks, & M. A. Schwartz (Eds.), The handbook of political sociology: States, civil societies and globalization (pp. 509-525). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1999). Governance matters. Policy Research Working Paper, 2196. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
• Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative ınstitutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7, 207–27.
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Fconomics, and Organization, 15(l), 222-79.
• Marangoz, Ş. (2001). Refah devleti: Gelişimi, oluşumu, modelleri ve güncel değişimler (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Mishan, E. J. (1969). Welfare economics:An assessment. Amsterdem: North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
• Moon, J. D. (2004). The political theory of the welfare state. In G. F. Gaus, C. Kukathas (Eds.), Handbook of political theory (pp. 210-222). London: Sage Publication.
• Özdemir, S. (2007). Küreselleşme sürecinde refah devleti. Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı, İstanbul: İstanbul Ticaret Odası Yayınları.
• Pierson, C. (2001). Modern devlet. (Çev. D. Hattatoğlu). İstanbul: Çiviyazıları.
• Pinch, S. (1997). Worlds of welfare: Understanding the changing geographies of social welfare provision. London: Routledge Press.
• Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to “difference” and “system” GMM in stata. The Center for Global Development Working Paper Series, No. 103.
• Sacks, A. & Levi, M. (2010). Measuring government effectiveness and its consequences for social welfare in Sub-Saharan African Countries. Social Forces, 88(5), 2325-2352.
• Sinn, Hans-W. (1995). A theory of the welfare state. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97 (4), 495-526.
• Şenocak, H. (2009). Sosyal güvenlik sistemini oluşturan bileşenlerin tarihi süreç ışığında değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 59, 409-468.
• Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2012). İleri panel veri analizi: Stata uygulamalı. İstanbul: Beta.