The Moral Dimension of Teaching, Affectionate Schools and the Student Drop Out: The Case Study of a Mountainous Community in Pakistan

Year 2012, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 84 - 101, 01.08.2012

Abstract

This study explored the perceptions, perspectives and viewpoints of the students about the reasons for turning the schools into uninteresting and unaffectionate places for the students eventually leading to the increased drop out ratio. This qualitative study was conducted in four secondary schools, which provide education to the children in four different educational systems of Gilgit- Baltistan, Pakistan. A number of six students from each school and altogether twenty four students were selected as the primary participants of this research. Semi structured interviews were the main tools of data collection. The findings highlighted the ethical, moral and behavioral aspect of teacher‘s personality as the most prominent feature for determining the degree of likeliness and affections of the students with their schools. The improvement in the ethics and moral aspect of the teacher‘s personality has all the potentials to improve the other aspects of the unattractive school environment

Keywords

Drop out, moral dimension of teaching, affectionate schools, Pakistan

References

• Baig, S. & Shafa, M., (2011) The Influence of a Whole School Improvement Program on the Value Orientation of a Head teacher in the Mountainous Region of Gilgit Baltistan, Pakistan Journal of Authentic Leadership in Education 2(1) 1-8
• Barr., R., B and Knowles., G., W. (1986) The san Diego City school 1984-85 school leavers and high school diploma program participant attitude study. San Diego city school: Planning research and Evaluation Division
• Beacham, H.,C.,(1980) Reaching and helping school dropouts and potential school leavers. Tallahassee, FL: Florida A &M University
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative Research for Education:An introduction to theory and methods. (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Brophy, J. E. (2004) Motivating Students to learn. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Inc.
• Canfield., J and Hansen., M.V.(1993) Chicken soup for the soul. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health communication, Inc.
• Carpenter., J., M.,(2006) Effective teaching methods for large classes journal of family & consumer sciences education, vol. 24, no. 2,
• Child, D. (2004) Psychology and the Teacher. Landon: Continuum.
• Christophel., D., M., (1990) The Relationships among Teachers‘ Immediacy
• Behaviors, Student Motivation and Learning Communication Education, volume 39,
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, mixed method approaches (2 nd
• ed.). California: Sage publication.
• Dornyei, Z. (1994) motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal 78(3), 273- 284
• Dornyei, Z. (2001) Teaching and Researching Motivation. London: Pearson Education Limited
• Good, T.L., and Brophy, J.E. (1994) Looking in Classrooms. New York: Harper Collins
• Gorham., J and Christophel., D., M.,(1992) Students' Perceptions of Teacher Behaviors As Motivating and Demotivating Factors in College Classes Communication Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 239-252.
• Government of Gilgit Baltistan (2007). EMIS 2008-09 Education Department Statistics: Gilgit Government of Gilgit Baltistan
• Government of Pakistan (2007). National Education Policy 2009: Islamabad Government of Pakistan.
• Hansen., D., (2001) Teaching as a moral activity. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.,pp.826-857). Washington DC: American Research Association.
• Harmer, J. (1991) The practice of English Language Teaching (3 ed.). rd Harlow:Longman.
• Liuoliene, A., and Metiuniene, R. (2006) Second language Motivation. Santalka, 14(2) 93-98.
• Manen.,M. V., (2002) The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness (3rd ed.), Albany, NY: State University
• Mclean, A. (2003) The motivated school. Landon Paul Publishing
• Noddings, N.,(1984) Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education Berkeley: University of California Press
• Rahman.,F., Jumani, N., B. and Basit,. A. (2010) Motivating and de-motivating factors among learners International journal of academic research vol. 2. No. 1.
• Reeve.,J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S. and Jon Barch., J. (2004) Enhancing Students‘ Engagement by Increasing Teachers‘ Autonomy Support Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 28, No. 2,
• Renchler., R., (1992) Student Motivation, School Culture, and Academic Achievement What School Leaders Can Do Eric clearinghouse on educational management [phone].
• Sherman., S.,(2005) Fostering Responsive Teaching by pre -service teacher Teaching & Learning, Volume 19, Number 3, pp.123-143
• Spaulding, C. L.(1992) Motivation in the Classroom (1st ed.). new York: McGraw- hill.
• Sweet,D. A. (1986) Extra curricular activity participents outperform other students.Washington DC: United states Department of education, OERI
• Vansteenkiste., M. and Deci., E., L. (2003) Competitively Contingent Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation: Can Losers Remain Motivated? Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 27, No. 4,
• Woolfolk, A. (2008) Educational Psychology. New Delhi: Pearson Education
• Yates, S. J. (2004). Doing social sciences research. London: SAGE Publications.
• Zimmerman., B.,J., (1990) Self-Regulated learning and Academic Achievement: An Over view Educational Psychologists, 25(1), 3-17