Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

“Gerçeğin” Peşinde: Dil, Kültür, Medya ve İnsan Üzerinden Gerçekliğin Sosyal İnşasına Dair Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme.

Year 2021, Issue: 53, 157 - 178, 31.03.2021

Ayşe Simin Kara

https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.864087
Cited By: 1

Abstract

İnsan, en önemli bilişsel süreçlerden biri olan dil yetisi kazanımını elde ettiğinden bu yana geçmişten günümüze hikâye anlatıcılığında değişmeyen unsurlar olduğunu görüyoruz. Değişmeyen unsurlara baktığımızda iyi bir hikâyenin kişisel ve duygusal bağ kurduğunu, dinleyiciyi alıp götürdüğünü ve herşeyden önemlisi harekete geçirdiğini söyleyebiliriz. Değişen tek şeyin ise hikâye anlatımının araçları olduğunu söylemek mümkün. Hikaye anlatıcılığı bir anlatı yöntemi olarak iletişimin her türünde karşımıza çıkmakta, iletişim uzmanları tarafından etkin iletişim adına bir strateji olarak konumlandırılmaktadır. Her türlü içeriğin üretildiği ve yeniden üretildiği dolayımlı bir medya ortamında yaşıyoruz. Teknolojik gelişmeler sayesinde hikâye anlatıcıların ikna gücü öyle kuvvetlenmiştir ki şekillendirilen dünyamızın aslında “gerçek” olmadığını unutuyoruz. Bu çalışmanın amacı, “gerçek” kavramına eleştirel bir bakış açısı sunmaktır. Bu bakış açısı, hipergerçekliği (gerçek ötesi), medyanın toplumun kimlik ve gerçeklik anlayışı üzerindeki etkisini vurgulayarak gerçeğin inşasını eleştirel, stratejik ve sözbilimsel olarak inceleyen post-modern perspektiften sunacaktır. Ayrıca, gazeteciliğin geleceği olarak ifade edilen mekânsal gazetecilik örneği üzerinden hakikatın inşasını konu alıp yeni teknolojilerin hiper ortam üzerinden nasıl “gerçeği” inşaa ettiklerini eleştirel bir dille yansıtacaktır.

Keywords

göstergebilim gerçek ötesi sözbilim gerçekliğin sosyal inşası retorik

References

  • Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment (Vol. 15). Verso Books.
  • Ambrose, D. (2009). Lyotard and Levinas: the logic of obligation. JAC, 633-659.
  • Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. 1957. Trans. Annette Lavers. New York: Hill and Wang, 302-06.
  • Barthes, R. (1977). Rhetoric of the image. In Heath, S. (Ed.) Image, music, text. London: Fontana
  • Baudrillard, J. (1975). The mirror of production (Vol. 17). St. Louis: Telos Press.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1983). The precession of simulacra. New York.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1988). The hyper-realism of simulation. Jean Baudrillard: selected writings, 143-147.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan press.
  • Baudrillard, J. (2005). Violence of the virtual and integral reality. International Journal of Baudrillard Studies, 2(2), 1-16.
  • Baudrillard, J. (2019). For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Verso Books.
  • Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Foucault and the Critique of Modernity. In Postmodern Theory (pp. 34-75). Palgrave, London.
  • Bevilacqua, V. M. (1965). Adam Smith's Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres. Studies in Scottish Literature, 3(1), 41-60.
  • Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2013). Narrative persuasion. The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice, 2, 200-219.
  • Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric. In J. Luraites, C.
  • Braet, A. C. (1992). Ethos, pathos and logos in Aristotle's Rhetoric: A re-examination. Argumentation, 6(3), 307-320.
  • Brown, R. H. (1987). Society as text: Essays on rhetoric, reason, and reality. University of Chicago Press.
  • Browning, G. K. (2000). Lyotard and the End of Grand Narratives. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
  • Browning, G. K. (2003). Lyotard and Hegel: what is wrong with modernity and what is right with the philosophy of right. History of European ideas, 29(2), 223-239.
  • Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Univ of California Press.
  • Cadoux, M. (2019). “AR and VR will make spatial journalism the future of reporting”. Erişim 5 Ocak 2020: https://venturebeat.com/2019/11/10/ar-and-vr-will-make-spatial-journalism-the future-of-reporting/
  • Canter, D. V., Grieve, N., Nicol, C., & Benneworth, K. (2003). Narrative plausibility: The impact of sequence and anchoring. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(2), 251-267.
  • Cheney, G. (1983). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication. Quarterly journal of speech, 69(2), 143-158.
  • Cohen, A. (2010). Myth and myth criticism following the dialectic of enlightenment. European Legacy, 15(5), 583-598.
  • Condit, & S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary Rhetorical Theory (pp. 217–225). New Jersey, USA: Guilford Press.
  • D'Angelo, F. J. (1975). A conceptual theory of rhetoric. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
  • D'Angelo, F. J. (2009). The rhetoric of intertextuality. Rhetoric Review, 29(1), 31-47.
  • De Saussure, F. (2006). Nature of the linguistic sign. Images: A reader, 105-107.
  • Denzin, N. K. (1986). Postmodern social theory. Sociological theory, 4(2), 194-204.
  • D'haen, T. (1983). Text to reader: a communicative approach to Fowles, Barth, Cortazar and Boon (Vol. 16). John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics (Vol. 217). Indiana University Press.
  • Edbauer, J. (2005). Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies. Rhetoric society quarterly, 35(4), 5-24.
  • Ellis, G. (1995). Storytelling and storybooks: A broader version of the communicative approach. ESOL France-British Council, 2(1), 89-100.
  • Evans, J., & Hall, S. (Eds.). (1999). Visual culture: The reader. Sage.
  • Fawcett, R. P. (2000). A theory of syntax for systemic functional linguistics (Vol. 206). John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Gane, M. (2002). Baudrillard's bestiary: Baudrillard and culture. Routledge.
  • Gottdiener, M. (1985). Hegemony and mass culture: A semiotic approach. American journal of sociology, 90(5), 979-1001.
  • Grimaldi, W. M. (1978). Rhetoric and Truth: A Note on Aristotle." Rhetoric" 1355a 21-24. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 173-177.
  • Habermas, J. (1988). Legitimation Crisis. Oxford: Polity Press .
  • Habermas, J., & Levin, T. Y. (1982). The entwinement of myth and enlightenment: Re-reading dialectic of enlightenment. New German Critique, (26), 13-30.
  • Jappy, T. (2013). Introduction to Peircean visual semiotics. A&C Black.
  • Jenks, C. (Ed.). (2002). Visual culture. Routledge.
  • Kant, I. (1929). Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith, (Boston/New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
  • Kellner, D. (1989). Jean Baudrillard: From Marxism to postmodernism and beyond (Vol. 179). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Lyotard, J. F. (2000). The postmodern condition. Sociology of Education: Theories and methods, 1, 362.
  • Lyotard, J. F., & Brügger, N. (2001). What about the Postmodern? The Concept of the Postmodern in the Work of Lyotard. Yale French Studies, (99), 77-92.
  • Lyotard, J. F., & Engelmann, P. (1986). Das postmoderne wissen: Ein bericht. Böhlau.
  • MacDonald, M. (2006). Empire and communication: the media wars of Marshall
  • McLuhan. Media, Culture & Society, 28(4), 505-520.
  • Malpas, S. (2003). Jean-François Lyotard. Psychology Press.
  • Malpas, S., & McGowan, K. (2002). 5 Postmodernism. Year's Work in Critical & Cultural Theory, 9(1).
  • Merrin, W. (2005). Baudrillard and the media: A critical introduction. Polity.
  • McKerrow, R. E. (1989). Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communications Monographs, 56(2), 91-111.
  • Moriarty, S. E. (2002). The symbiotics of semiotics and visual communication. Journal of Visual Literacy, 22(1), 19-28.
  • Moriarty, S. E. (2005). Visual semiotics theory. Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, 8, 227-241.
  • Morris, C. W. (2014). Writings on the general theory of signs (Vol. 16). Walter de Gruyter.
  • Özgen, N. (2019). Siyasal Sistemler Bağlamında Sansür Kavramı Örnek Olay: İliştirilmiş Gazetecilik Pratiği. Electronic Turkish Studies, 14(6).
  • Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce (Vol. 217). Courier Corporation.
  • Poster, M. (1984). Foucault, Marxism, and History (p. 962). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage.
  • Smith, J. K. (2006). Who's Afraid of Postmodernism?(The Church and Postmodern Culture): Taking Derrida, Lyotard, and Foucault to Church. Baker Academic.
  • Smith, M. W. (2001). Reading simulacra: Fatal theories for postmodernity. SUNY Press.
  • Smith, R. G. (2015). Jean Baudrillard: From hyperreality to disappearance. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Theguardian. (2019). “Global attention span is narrowing and trends don't last as long, study reveals”. Erişim tarihi 19 Aralık 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/apr/16/got-a-minute-global-attention-span-is-narrowing-study-reveals
  • Vatz, R. E. (1973). The myth of the rhetorical situation. Philosophy & rhetoric, 154-161.

Year 2021, Issue: 53, 157 - 178, 31.03.2021

Ayşe Simin Kara

https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.864087
Cited By: 1

Abstract

References

  • Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment (Vol. 15). Verso Books.
  • Ambrose, D. (2009). Lyotard and Levinas: the logic of obligation. JAC, 633-659.
  • Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. 1957. Trans. Annette Lavers. New York: Hill and Wang, 302-06.
  • Barthes, R. (1977). Rhetoric of the image. In Heath, S. (Ed.) Image, music, text. London: Fontana
  • Baudrillard, J. (1975). The mirror of production (Vol. 17). St. Louis: Telos Press.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1983). The precession of simulacra. New York.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1988). The hyper-realism of simulation. Jean Baudrillard: selected writings, 143-147.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan press.
  • Baudrillard, J. (2005). Violence of the virtual and integral reality. International Journal of Baudrillard Studies, 2(2), 1-16.
  • Baudrillard, J. (2019). For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Verso Books.
  • Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Foucault and the Critique of Modernity. In Postmodern Theory (pp. 34-75). Palgrave, London.
  • Bevilacqua, V. M. (1965). Adam Smith's Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres. Studies in Scottish Literature, 3(1), 41-60.
  • Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2013). Narrative persuasion. The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice, 2, 200-219.
  • Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric. In J. Luraites, C.
  • Braet, A. C. (1992). Ethos, pathos and logos in Aristotle's Rhetoric: A re-examination. Argumentation, 6(3), 307-320.
  • Brown, R. H. (1987). Society as text: Essays on rhetoric, reason, and reality. University of Chicago Press.
  • Browning, G. K. (2000). Lyotard and the End of Grand Narratives. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
  • Browning, G. K. (2003). Lyotard and Hegel: what is wrong with modernity and what is right with the philosophy of right. History of European ideas, 29(2), 223-239.
  • Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Univ of California Press.
  • Cadoux, M. (2019). “AR and VR will make spatial journalism the future of reporting”. Erişim 5 Ocak 2020: https://venturebeat.com/2019/11/10/ar-and-vr-will-make-spatial-journalism-the future-of-reporting/
  • Canter, D. V., Grieve, N., Nicol, C., & Benneworth, K. (2003). Narrative plausibility: The impact of sequence and anchoring. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(2), 251-267.
  • Cheney, G. (1983). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication. Quarterly journal of speech, 69(2), 143-158.
  • Cohen, A. (2010). Myth and myth criticism following the dialectic of enlightenment. European Legacy, 15(5), 583-598.
  • Condit, & S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary Rhetorical Theory (pp. 217–225). New Jersey, USA: Guilford Press.
  • D'Angelo, F. J. (1975). A conceptual theory of rhetoric. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
  • D'Angelo, F. J. (2009). The rhetoric of intertextuality. Rhetoric Review, 29(1), 31-47.
  • De Saussure, F. (2006). Nature of the linguistic sign. Images: A reader, 105-107.
  • Denzin, N. K. (1986). Postmodern social theory. Sociological theory, 4(2), 194-204.
  • D'haen, T. (1983). Text to reader: a communicative approach to Fowles, Barth, Cortazar and Boon (Vol. 16). John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics (Vol. 217). Indiana University Press.
  • Edbauer, J. (2005). Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies. Rhetoric society quarterly, 35(4), 5-24.
  • Ellis, G. (1995). Storytelling and storybooks: A broader version of the communicative approach. ESOL France-British Council, 2(1), 89-100.
  • Evans, J., & Hall, S. (Eds.). (1999). Visual culture: The reader. Sage.
  • Fawcett, R. P. (2000). A theory of syntax for systemic functional linguistics (Vol. 206). John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Gane, M. (2002). Baudrillard's bestiary: Baudrillard and culture. Routledge.
  • Gottdiener, M. (1985). Hegemony and mass culture: A semiotic approach. American journal of sociology, 90(5), 979-1001.
  • Grimaldi, W. M. (1978). Rhetoric and Truth: A Note on Aristotle." Rhetoric" 1355a 21-24. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 173-177.
  • Habermas, J. (1988). Legitimation Crisis. Oxford: Polity Press .
  • Habermas, J., & Levin, T. Y. (1982). The entwinement of myth and enlightenment: Re-reading dialectic of enlightenment. New German Critique, (26), 13-30.
  • Jappy, T. (2013). Introduction to Peircean visual semiotics. A&C Black.
  • Jenks, C. (Ed.). (2002). Visual culture. Routledge.
  • Kant, I. (1929). Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith, (Boston/New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
  • Kellner, D. (1989). Jean Baudrillard: From Marxism to postmodernism and beyond (Vol. 179). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Lyotard, J. F. (2000). The postmodern condition. Sociology of Education: Theories and methods, 1, 362.
  • Lyotard, J. F., & Brügger, N. (2001). What about the Postmodern? The Concept of the Postmodern in the Work of Lyotard. Yale French Studies, (99), 77-92.
  • Lyotard, J. F., & Engelmann, P. (1986). Das postmoderne wissen: Ein bericht. Böhlau.
  • MacDonald, M. (2006). Empire and communication: the media wars of Marshall
  • McLuhan. Media, Culture & Society, 28(4), 505-520.
  • Malpas, S. (2003). Jean-François Lyotard. Psychology Press.
  • Malpas, S., & McGowan, K. (2002). 5 Postmodernism. Year's Work in Critical & Cultural Theory, 9(1).
  • Merrin, W. (2005). Baudrillard and the media: A critical introduction. Polity.
  • McKerrow, R. E. (1989). Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communications Monographs, 56(2), 91-111.
  • Moriarty, S. E. (2002). The symbiotics of semiotics and visual communication. Journal of Visual Literacy, 22(1), 19-28.
  • Moriarty, S. E. (2005). Visual semiotics theory. Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, 8, 227-241.
  • Morris, C. W. (2014). Writings on the general theory of signs (Vol. 16). Walter de Gruyter.
  • Özgen, N. (2019). Siyasal Sistemler Bağlamında Sansür Kavramı Örnek Olay: İliştirilmiş Gazetecilik Pratiği. Electronic Turkish Studies, 14(6).
  • Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce (Vol. 217). Courier Corporation.
  • Poster, M. (1984). Foucault, Marxism, and History (p. 962). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage.
  • Smith, J. K. (2006). Who's Afraid of Postmodernism?(The Church and Postmodern Culture): Taking Derrida, Lyotard, and Foucault to Church. Baker Academic.
  • Smith, M. W. (2001). Reading simulacra: Fatal theories for postmodernity. SUNY Press.
  • Smith, R. G. (2015). Jean Baudrillard: From hyperreality to disappearance. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Theguardian. (2019). “Global attention span is narrowing and trends don't last as long, study reveals”. Erişim tarihi 19 Aralık 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/apr/16/got-a-minute-global-attention-span-is-narrowing-study-reveals
  • Vatz, R. E. (1973). The myth of the rhetorical situation. Philosophy & rhetoric, 154-161.
There are 64 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Communication and Media Studies
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Ayşe Simin Kara 0000-0002-5641-9738

Publication Date March 31, 2021
Submission Date January 19, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 53

Cite

APA Kara, A. S. (2021). “Gerçeğin” Peşinde: Dil, Kültür, Medya ve İnsan Üzerinden Gerçekliğin Sosyal İnşasına Dair Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme. İletişim Kuram Ve Araştırma Dergisi, 2021(53), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.864087

Cited By

SQUİD GAME DİZİSİ’NDE YER ALAN MEKÂN VE SEMBOLLER ÜZERİNE İNCELEME
Meriç Uluslararası Sosyal ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.54707/meric.1058504
 Download Cover Image