Türkiye ve İrlanda Fen Öğretimi Programlarının Karşılaştırılması

Hüseyin Eş; Mustafa Sarıkaya

Research Article

A Comparison of Science Curriculum in Ireland and Turkey

Year 2010, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 1092 - 1105, 26.06.2010

Hüseyin Eş , Mustafa Sarıkaya

Abstract

In this study, Turkish Ministry of National Education of Primary School Science and Technology
Curriculum (2005) and Ireland Primary School Science Curriculum (1999) have been evaluated by comparing
the contents and purposes. In this study, qualitative document review method has been used. At the end of the
research, differences have been found with regard to class levels of curriculums, learning areas, dispersal of
learning areas according to the class levels, curriculum purposes and numbers of acquisitions.

Keywords

Science and Technology, Science Curriculum, Curriculum Development

References

Abraham, M., Williamson, V. & Westbrook, S. (1994). A cross age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 (2), 147–165.
Ayas, A., Çepni, S. ve Özbay, Y. (1994). Bilginin sosyal yapılanmasının öğretmen eğitimi ve müfredat programlarıyla ilişkisi, akademik yorum. Eğitim, 30.
Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Johnson, D. ve Turgut, M.F. (1997). Fizik öğretimi. YÖK/ Dünya Bankası. Milli eğitimi geliştirme projesi. Hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi. Ankara.
Deboer, G.E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York and London: Teachers College Press, Colombia University.
Department of Education and Science (DES), (2009). Irish education system. www.educationireland.ie/irish-education.html adresinden 2009 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Eş, H., Sarıkaya, M., Taşkın ekici, F. ve Ekici, E. (2010). Türkiye MEB ve Ontario (Kanada) Eyaleti fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programlarının karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmesi. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 1C0148, 5, (2), 567-583.
Griffiths, A. K. & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade–12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (6), 611–628.
Guzzetti, B. J. (2000). Learning counter- intuitive science concepts: what have we learned from over a decade of research. Reading, Writing, Quarterly, 16 (2). 89-95.
Kavak, N. ve Tufan, Y. (2006). Fen-teknoloji okuryazarlığı ve informal fen eğitimi: gazetelerin potansiyel rolü. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26 (3), 17-28.
Kelly, D.L. (2002). The TIMSS 1995 international benchmarks of mathematics and science achievement: profiles of world class performance at fourth and eighth grades. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8 (1), 41-54.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., Olson, J. E., Erberger, E., Preuschoff, C. & Galia, J. (2008). TIMMS 2007 international science report: findings from iea’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMMS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
McMinn, D.G., Nakamaye, K. L. & Smieja, D. A. (1994). Enhancing under graduate education.Chemistry Education, 71 (9), 755-758.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB), (2005). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi 4., 5., 6., 7. ve 8. sınıflar öğretim programı. Ankara: MEB Yayınevi.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB), (2007). Eğitimi araştırma ve geliştirme dairesi başkanlığı PISA 2006 Uluslararası öğrenci değerlendirme programı ulusal ön rapor. http://earged.meb.gov.tr/earged/Ol%C3%A7me/pisa/Dokumanlar/PISA_2006_Ulusal_On.pdf adresinden 2009 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Mulford, D. R. & Robinson, W. R. (2002). An inventory for alternate conceptions among first–semester general chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 79 (6), 739–744.
National Qualifications Authority of Ireland (NQAI), (2009). Primary. http://www.qualificationsrecognition.ie/recognition/ir_edu_train/primary.html adresinden 2009 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Nisbet, J. & Shucksmith, J. (1986). Learning strategies. routledge & Kegan Paul. London: Boston and Henley.
Osborne, R. & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: the implications of children’s science. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.
Reddy, V. (2005). Cross-national achievement studies: learning from South Africa’s participation in the trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Compare A Journal of Comparative Education, 35(1), 63-77.
Sarikaya, M. (2004). The application of an activity relating to the determination of Avogadro’s number in a class of first–year science students. The Chemical Educator, 9 (1), 17–19.
Social, Environmental and Scientific Education (SESE). (1999). Primary School Curriculum Science. Dublin: The Stationary Office (Government Publications).
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L. & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: action research in the classroom. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, (29), 409-421.
Sönmez, V. (2001). Program geliştirmede öğretmen el kitabı (Geliştirilmiş Dokuzuncu Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Su, Z. & Su, J. (1994). Teaching and learning science in American and Chinese high schools: a comparative study. Comparative Education, 30 (3), 255-265.
Taşar, M. F. ve Karaçam, S. (2008). T.C. 6-8. sınıflar fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programının A.B.D. Massachusetts eyaleti bilim ve teknoloji/mühendislik dersi öğretim programı ile karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 179. http://yayim.meb.gov.tr/dergiler/179/15.pdf adresinden 2009 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
Vries, M. J. (2006). “Two decades of technology education in retrospect,” in de Vries M. J. & Mottier, I. (eds.) international handbook of technology education: reviewing the past twenty years. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.