PROBLEMS AND EDUCATIONAL NEEDS RELATED TO PORT CATHETER IN CANCER PATIENTS

Year 2022, , 849 - 859, 14.11.2022

Mehmet Zeki Avcı Sevda Şahin , Betülay Kılıç , Hatice Sutcu Cıcek

https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.833491

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the problems and educational needs of cancer patients due to the port catheter. Between January and March 2018, 100 cancer patients over 18 years of age with a port catheter were enrolled. The data was collected through a data collection form consisting of 29 items examining the sociodemographic and port catheter-related problems of patients. It was determined that 14% of patients had problems, 64.3% had infections, 21.4% had catheter exposure, and 14.3% had a displacement of catheter. Primary school graduates stated that they had more problems during catheter use and care, compared to high school and university graduate patients (p=0.037). Male patients were found to have more problems than female patients (p=0.039). In this study, it was observed that patients with cancer were inadequate to maintain home care of the port catheter and therefore experienced complications that could threaten their health, especially infection. It is recommended that patients be given practical training about the maintenance of the port catheter by specially trained nurses.

Keywords

Port Catheters, Central venous catheter, Port catheter complications, Education of patients

Kanser Hastalarında Port Katetere Bağlı Sorunlar Ve Eğitim Gereksinimleri

Abstract

Bu araştırma, kanser hastalarının port kateter nedeniyle yaşadıkları sorunları ve eğitim gereksinimlerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Tanımlayıcı tipteki bir araştırma Ocak-Mart 2018 tarihleri arasında Doktor Burhan Nalbantoğlu Devlet Hastanesi Onkoloji Merkezinde yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini, klinikte yatan ve ayaktan tedavi gören, port kateterli, 18 yaş üstü 100 kanser hastası oluşturmuştur. Veriler, literatür taraması sonucu oluşturulan, hastaların sosyodemografik ve port kateter ilişkili sorunlarını sorgulayan, 29 sorudan oluşan veri toplama formu ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde n ve % gösterim, karşılaştırmalarda ki kare testi kullanılmıştır. Katılımcıların %88’i kateterin takımı öncesi bilgilendirildiklerini, bilgi alınan kişinin %76.5 ile hemşireler olduğu bildirmiştir. Hastaların %14 ünün sorun yaşadığı, bunların %64,3’ünün enfeksiyon, %21.4’ünün kateterin exposure ve %14.3’nün kateterin yer değiştirmesi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. İlköğretim mezunu hastalar, lise ve üniversite mezunu hastalara göre kateter kullanımı ve bakımı sırasında daha fazla sorun yaşadıklarını belirtmiştir (p=0.037). Erkek hastaların kadın hastalara göre daha fazla sorun yaşadığı saptanmıştır (p=0.039). Bu araştırmada kanserli hastaların port kateterin evde bakımını sürdürmede yetersiz oldukları, bu nedenle başta enfeksiyon olmak üzere sağlıklarını tehdit edebilecek komplikasyonlar yaşadıkları görülmüştür. Özel eğitimli hemşireler tarafından, hastaların eğitim durumları ve cinsiyetleri göz önünde tutularak, hastalara port kateterin bakımı hakkında uygulamalı eğitimler verilmesi önerilmektedir

Keywords

Port kateter, Santral venöz kateter, Port kateter komplikasyonları, Hasta eğitimi

References

• Aktoz, M. (2018). Arteryal Hipertansiyon ve Kanser Kimi, Ne Zaman, Nasıl Tedavi Edelim? HT Bülteni, https://www.tkd.org.tr/HTBulteni/?sayi=6 (Erişim Tarihi:1.8.2020)
• Alur, İ., Depboylu, C.B., Demir, T., Toysa, İ.A., Alten, M.C. (2012). Our Central Venous Catheter Applications in Cancer Patients; Retrospective Analysis of 186 Cases. Fleboloji Dergisi, 14(1), 8-12.
• Atalay, O.Y., Köksal, E., Uzunkaya, F., Soylu, İ.A., Kalaycıoğlu, B., Tanrıdır, Y. A. (2016). Complication of subclavian port catheter: Superior vena cava syndrome. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, 6(4), 352-56.
• Carlo, T.C., Lamont, J.P., McCarty, T.M., Living-Ston, S., Kuhn J.A. (2004). A Prospective Randomized Trial Demonstrating Valved Implantable Ports Have Fewer Complications and Lower Overall Cost Than Nonvalved Implantable Ports. Am J Surg, 188,722-7.
• Central Venous Access Devices (CVAD) 2017- Policy for Insertion and Care in Hospital https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg34/resources/policy-for-the-insertion-and-care-of-central-venous-access-devices-cvad-in-hospital-royal-marsden-nhs-ft-pdf-4481503169 (Erişim tarihi:1.8.2020)
• Cicolini, G., Simonetti, V., Comparcini, D., Labeau, S., Blot, S., Pelusi, G., Di Giovanni, P. (2014). Nurses’ knowledge of evidence-based guidelines on the prevention of peripheral venous catheter-related infections: A multicentre survey. J Clin Nurs, 23, 2578-88.
• Çetinkaya, F., Aşiret, G.D. (2017). Identification of Learning Needs of Patients in Medical and Surgical Units. DEUHFED, 10(2), 93-9.
• Dahl, H.D., Hengstmann, J.H., Bode, U., Hansen, H. (1986). Clinical Application of a Totally Implantable Catheter System. Dtsch med Wochenschr, 111: 88-92.
• Di Carlo, I., Cordio, S., La Greca, G., Privitera, G., Russello, D., Puleo, S., Latteri, F. (2001). Totally implantable venous access devices implanted surgically: a retrospective study on early and late complications. Arch Surg, 136(9), 1050–3.
• Dillon, P.A., Foglia, R.P. (2006). Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device. J Pediatr Surg, 41, 1582-7.
• Hsieh, C.C., Weng, H.H., Huang, W.S., Wang, W.K., Kao, C.L., Lu, M.S., Wang, C.S. (2009). Analysis of risk factors for central venous port failure in cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol, 15:4709–14.
• Kaygın, M.A., Dağ, Ö., Güneş, M., Şenocak, M., Erkut, B. (2012). The Use of Intravenous Port in Maling Disease: 5-Year Experience Selçuk Tıp Dergisi, 28(1), 17-21.
• Kelsaka, E., Güldoğuş, F. (2005). Retrospective Evaluation of Our Vascular Port Implantations. International Journal of Hematology and Oncology, 27(4), 195-8. Korkmaz, Ö., Göksel, S., Yetkin, U., Öcal, B. (2016). Insertable Portal Venous Catheter For Administering Chemotherapy: A Three-Year Clinical Experience. Medical Journal of İzmir Hospital, 20 (1), 19-25.
• Kuloğlu, Z. (2019). Port Katater Bakım Rehberi, http://pedgastro.org/icerik/port2019.pdf (Erişim tarihi:1.8.2020) Kutlu, R. (2015). Temporary / Permanent Venous Catheters and Port Placement. Trd Sem, 3, 298-315.
• Madabhavi, I., Patel, A., Sarkar, M., Anand, A., Panchal, H., Parikh, S. (2017). A Study of Use of “PORT” Catheter in Patients with Cancer: A Single-Center Experience. Clin Med Insights Oncol, 11, 1-6.
• McCallum, L., Higgins, D. (2012). Care of peripheral venous cannula sites. Nursing Times, 108 (34-35), 12-5.
• O’Grady, N.P., Alexander, M., Burns, L.A., Dellinger, P., Garland, J., Heard, S. O., Saint, S. (2011). Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections. Clin Infect Dis, 52(9), 162-93.
• Pérez Fidalgo, J.A., García Fabregat, L., Cervantes, A., Margulies, A., Vidall, C., Roila, F. (2012). ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Management of chemotherapy extravasation: ESMO-EONS clinical practice guidelines. Annals of Oncology, 23 (7), 167–73.
• Piredda, M., Biagioli, V., Giannarelli, D., Incletoli, D., Grieco, F., Carassiti, M., De Marinis, M.G. (2016). Improving Cancer Patients' Knowledge About Totally Implantable Access Port: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24(2), 833-41.
• Ryu, T.Y., Park, J., Scherer, P.E. (2014). Hyperglycemia as a risk factor for cancer progression. Diabetes Metab J, 38(5), 330-6.
• Salman, T., Türkyılmaz, D., Yavuzşen, T., Somalı, I., Alacacioğlu, A., Koca, D.,Yılmaz, U. (2016). Evalution of central venous catheter ports placed by medical oncologists: A single center experience. Acta Oncologica Turcica, 49(2), 102-10.
• Samancı, T., Mandel, N.M., Bozkurt, A.K., Kutlu, F., Uras, C. (2004). Evaluation of port complications in 115 cancer patients. Cerrahpaşa J Med, 35(2),71-7.
• Sciacca, L., Vigneri, R., Tumminia, A., Frasca, F., Squatrito, S., Flittitta, L., Vigneric, P. (2013). Clinical and molecular mechanisms favoring cancer initiation and progression in diabetic patients. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 23(9), 808-15.
• Tabatabaie, O., Kasumova, G.G., Eskander, M.F., Critchlow, J.F., Tawa, N.E., Tseng, J.F. (2017). Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices: A Review of Complications and Management Strategies. Am J Clin Oncol, 40(1), 94-105.
• Uğur, Ö., Kudubeş, A.A., Arslan, D., Küçükkurt, H., Özürk, G. (2016). The Examination of the Daily Port Use Behaviour and Affecting Factors of Cancer Patients with Implantable Catheter Port. Turkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci, 8(3), 204-212.
• Vescia, S., Baumgartner, A.K., Jacobs, V.R., Kieche-Bahat M, Rody A, Loibl S, Harbeck, N. (2008). Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence. Annals of Oncology, 19(1), 9-15.
• Wang, Y.C., Lin, P.L., Chou, W.H., Lin, C.P., Huang, C.H. (2017). Long-term outcomes of totally implantable venous access devices. Support Care Cancer, 25, 2049-54.
• Yanık, F., Karamustafaoğlu, Y.A., Karataş, A., Yörük, Y. (2018). Experience in Totally Implantable Venous Port Catheter: Analysis of 3000 Patients in 12 Years. Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 26(3), 422-8.
• Yeşil, S., Tanyıldız, H.G., Ardıçlı, B., Tekgündüz, S.A., Çandır, M.O., Toprak, Ş., Gürses, Ş. (2014). Central Venous Catheter-Related Complications. Gazi Med J, 25(4),135-7.
• Yu, X.Y., Xu, J.L., Li, D., Jiang, Z.F. (2018). Late complications of totally implantable venous access ports in patients with cancer. Risk factors and related nursing strategies. Medicine (Baltimore), 97(38), 12427.