Research Article

Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China

Volume: 14 Number: 1 March 8, 2024
TR EN

Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China

Abstract

This study aims to address the debate on universalism versus relativism regarding human rights over the case of China. By the end of the Cold War and with the increasing effects of globalization dynamics, the idea of human rights had become a controversial issue, and interventions in states that violate human rights have come to the agenda of international society. United States of America and the European Union have frequently mentioned the issue of human rights violations with regard to China. However, China has emphasized that no one should intervene with it on this issue, claiming up until the 1990s in the face of these allegations that the issue was its own internal affair. Meanwhile, China has tried to open a discussion about the universality of human rights through cultural values. China focuses on Asian values, claiming that human rights are a product of the Eurocentric Western modern world. This situation can be considered a challenge of postmodern and post-colonial theories that highlight cultural relativism, regarding the mainstream theories represented by realism and liberalism within the discipline of International Relations. However, using these critical theories may reproduce existing power relations by reducing them into a cultural context. This study seeks to reexamine China’s human rights understanding beyond the universalism vs. relativism debate.

Keywords

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2017). After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order, Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 271–285.
  2. Acharya, A. (2020). The myth of the “civilization state”: Rising powers and the cultural challenge to world order. Ethics & International Affairs, 34(2), 139–156.
  3. Angle, S., & Svensson, M. (2001). The Chinese human rights reader: Documents and commentary 1900–2000. M. E. Sharpe.
  4. Angle, S. C. (2002). Human rights and Chinese thought: A cross-cultural inquiry. Cambridge University Press.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

International Relations (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 8, 2024

Submission Date

February 28, 2023

Acceptance Date

July 12, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 14 Number: 1

APA
Alkış, M. (2024). Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China. İnsan Ve Toplum, 14(1), 46-59. https://izlik.org/JA25UT64DM
AMA
1.Alkış M. Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China. JHS. 2024;14(1):46-59. https://izlik.org/JA25UT64DM
Chicago
Alkış, Mehmet. 2024. “Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China”. İnsan Ve Toplum 14 (1): 46-59. https://izlik.org/JA25UT64DM.
EndNote
Alkış M (March 1, 2024) Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China. İnsan ve Toplum 14 1 46–59.
IEEE
[1]M. Alkış, “Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China”, JHS, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 46–59, Mar. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA25UT64DM
ISNAD
Alkış, Mehmet. “Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China”. İnsan ve Toplum 14/1 (March 1, 2024): 46-59. https://izlik.org/JA25UT64DM.
JAMA
1.Alkış M. Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China. JHS. 2024;14:46–59.
MLA
Alkış, Mehmet. “Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China”. İnsan Ve Toplum, vol. 14, no. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 46-59, https://izlik.org/JA25UT64DM.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Alkış. Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China. JHS [Internet]. 2024 Mar. 1;14(1):46-59. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA25UT64DM