Exploring Efficacy of a Community-Based Reading Programme for At-Risk ChildrenJanet Siew Poh LAW

Volume: 7 Number: 2 January 17, 2016
  • Janet Siew Poh Law
  • Noel Kok Hwee Chıa

Exploring Efficacy of a Community-Based Reading Programme for At-Risk ChildrenJanet Siew Poh LAW

Abstract

This study reports an exploratory evaluation of a community-based reading programme kidsREAD. Children (N=186) aged 4 through 8, of different ethnic groups, from 12 reading clubs, were exposed to one hour of reading intervention with trained volunteers at various locations. For one year, volunteers read stories to children once a week in groups less than 30, then divided them up into smaller groups to engage in a variety of reading-related activities. Paired t-tests and inter-correlation analyses were conducted. Parent survey was collated for triangulation. There were significant improvements in use of English language, individual participation and peer interaction, and reading skills, at post-programme evaluation. Effect size analyses pointed to a significant impact of programme participation on changes in reading-related behaviour. Results from the analysis were used to predict the reading success for the programme, illustrated through the equation: RgA à [(UEL)(PAI)(RS)] à RgS. 

Keywords

References

  1. Allington, R.L. & Cunningham, P.M. (1996). Schools that work: Where all children read and write. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
  2. Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 285–303.
  3. Arizpe, E. & Blatt, J. (2011). How responses to picturebooks reflect and support the emotional development of young bilingual children. In Bettina Kümmerling- Meibauer (Ed.), Emergent literacy - Children’s books from 0 to 3. Series: Studies in written language and literacy (13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  4. Beck, I.L., & McKeown, M.G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55(1), 10–20.
  5. Biemiller, A., & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 44-62. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.44
  6. Bravo, M.A., Hiebert, E.H., & Pearson, P.D. (2007). Tapping the linguistic resources of Spanish/English bilinguals: The role of cognates in science. In R.K. Wagner, A.E. Muse, & K.R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 140-156). New York: Guilford.
  7. Brozo, W.G. (1990). Learning how at-risk readers learn best: A case for interactive assessment. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 33(7). 522-527.
  8. Bryan, T. H. (1978). Social relationships and verbal interactions of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(2): 107-115.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Janet Siew Poh Law This is me

Noel Kok Hwee Chıa This is me

Publication Date

January 17, 2016

Submission Date

January 17, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 7 Number: 2

APA
Law, J. S. P., & Chıa, N. K. H. (2016). Exploring Efficacy of a Community-Based Reading Programme for At-Risk ChildrenJanet Siew Poh LAW. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 7(2), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.40006