The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students according to Physical Activity Participation

Volume: 4 Number: Special Issue 2 September 1, 2016
  • Fahri Akçakoyun
  • Efecan Tezcan
  • Merve Ceylan
  • Vedat Mutlu
EN TR

The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students according to Physical Activity Participation

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate communication skills level of university students (Faculty of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Tourism Faculty) who were enrolled in 2014-2015 academic year at Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University according to physical activity participation, gender and which faculty they were enrolled Physical activity type and where to participate in a physical activity. 590 students were voluntarily participated in the study. In this study, Physical activity Behaviour Change questionnaire consisting of 4 questions developed by Marcus and Lewis (2003), criterion validity of which was made by Cengiz et al. (2010) was applied to students in order to determine their participation in physical activities. 5 point likert type Evaluation Scale for Communication Skills (ESCS) developed by Korkut (1996) was used to determine communication skill levels of students.  According to the findings obtained from these questionnaires, independent samples t-test, ANOVA test as well as Gabriel test in order to determine from which sources the difference was originated were applied depending on the aforementioned variables. In light of the obtained results, a significant difference was found for communication skills, their physical activity stage and where to participate in physical activities (p< 0.05). No significant difference was found in communication skill levels according to gender (p > 0.05). No significant difference was determined in communication skills according to physical activity type.

References

  1. Bingöl G, Demir A (2011). Amasya sağlık yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin iletişim Becerileri. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, 26(4), 152-159.
  2. Çalışkan N (2003). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin sözel olmayan iletişim davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi.Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
  3. Çaha Ö (1999). Spora yaslanarak bir nefes almak. Düşünen Siyaset, 1, 115-125.
  4. Demirci E E (2002). İletişim becerileri eğitiminin mesleki eğitim merkezine devam eden genç işçilerin iletişim becerilerini değerlendirmelerine Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  5. Dilekman M, Başçı Z, Bektaş F (2008). Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin İletişim Becerileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(2).
  6. Gülbahçe Ö (2010). KK Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin İletişim Becerilerinin İncelenmesi Kk Educatıon Faculty. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 12(2).
  7. Korkut F (1996). İletişim becerileri eğitiminin lise öğrencilerinin iletişim becerilerini değerlendirmelerine etkisi. 3P Dergisi. 4(3) 191-198.
  8. Şirin H, Izgar H (2013). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin İletişim Becerileri ve Olumsuz Otomatik Düşünceleri Arasındaki İlişki İlköğretim Online, 12(2), 585-596,

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Fahri Akçakoyun This is me

Efecan Tezcan This is me

Merve Ceylan This is me

Vedat Mutlu This is me

Publication Date

September 1, 2016

Submission Date

October 4, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 4 Number: Special Issue 2

APA
Akçakoyun, F., Tezcan, E., Ceylan, M., & Mutlu, V. (2016). The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students according to Physical Activity Participation. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 4(Special Issue 2), 615-624. https://izlik.org/JA25ZJ93LW
AMA
1.Akçakoyun F, Tezcan E, Ceylan M, Mutlu V. The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students according to Physical Activity Participation. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science. 2016;4(Special Issue 2):615-624. https://izlik.org/JA25ZJ93LW
Chicago
Akçakoyun, Fahri, Efecan Tezcan, Merve Ceylan, and Vedat Mutlu. 2016. “The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students According to Physical Activity Participation”. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science 4 (Special Issue 2): 615-24. https://izlik.org/JA25ZJ93LW.
EndNote
Akçakoyun F, Tezcan E, Ceylan M, Mutlu V (October 1, 2016) The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students according to Physical Activity Participation. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science 4 Special Issue 2 615–624.
IEEE
[1]F. Akçakoyun, E. Tezcan, M. Ceylan, and V. Mutlu, “The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students according to Physical Activity Participation”, International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, vol. 4, no. Special Issue 2, pp. 615–624, Oct. 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA25ZJ93LW
ISNAD
Akçakoyun, Fahri - Tezcan, Efecan - Ceylan, Merve - Mutlu, Vedat. “The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students According to Physical Activity Participation”. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science 4/Special Issue 2 (October 1, 2016): 615-624. https://izlik.org/JA25ZJ93LW.
JAMA
1.Akçakoyun F, Tezcan E, Ceylan M, Mutlu V. The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students according to Physical Activity Participation. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science. 2016;4:615–624.
MLA
Akçakoyun, Fahri, et al. “The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students According to Physical Activity Participation”. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, vol. 4, no. Special Issue 2, Oct. 2016, pp. 615-24, https://izlik.org/JA25ZJ93LW.
Vancouver
1.Fahri Akçakoyun, Efecan Tezcan, Merve Ceylan, Vedat Mutlu. The Investigation of the Communication Skill Levels of University Students according to Physical Activity Participation. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science [Internet]. 2016 Oct. 1;4(Special Issue 2):615-24. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA25ZJ93LW