Research Article

Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters

Volume: 5 Number: 4 December 17, 2017
  • Ahmet Mor
  • Gökhan İpekoğlu
  • Cansel Arslanoğlu
  • Kürşat Acar
  • Erkal Arslanoğlu *
EN

Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the acute effect of short term active and passive recovery methods on strength after high intensity interval training (HIIT). Method: Twelve trained male bodybuilders (18–30 years of age) voluntary participated in the study, on a voluntary basis. The criteria for the athletes were being healthy, not having any chronic or acute disorders, and not having restrictions on movement due to injuries.Subjects applied randomly active and passive recovery techniques (Electrostimulation, core training, control) after each HIIT on three different days. Performance tests were conducted on athletes before (Pre-T) and after HIIT (Post-T). The data collected were analysed with dependent two sample t test and independent samples t test. Results: Although there was an increase in the anaerobic strength, vertical jump, and back strength levels, no statistically significant difference was found in between groups (p>0,01). Similarly, a decrease was found in the levels of leg strength and right-left handgrip strength in three groups. Although the difference in the control group was not meaningful in terms of these values, there was a significant difference in the right-left hand grip strength levels in the core training and stimulation groups  (p<0,01). Pre-T the values of right-left handgrip strength in the core training group decreased from 48,46±5,06 to 46,16±5,84, from 47,95±5,44, to 46,50±5,43 respectively compared to Post-T (p<0,01). In the electrostimulation group, on the other hand, Pre-T the right handgrip strength decreased from 47,36±4,48 to 45,72±5,31 while Pre-T the left handgrip strength decreased from 46,45±4,27 to 44,13±5,05, compared to Post-T (p<0,01). Additionally, the comparison between the groups Pre-T and Post-T showed no statistically significant difference (p>0,01).Conclusion:  The active and passive recovery methots, did not have any effect on strength parameters in bodybuilders and does not provide any acute effect in the recovery period after high intensity training. 

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmadi S, Granier P, Taoutaou Z, Mercier J, Dubouchaud H, Prefaut C (1996). Effects of active recovery on plasma lactate and anaerobic power following repeated intensive exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 28(4): 450-456.
  2. Aslankeser Z (2010). The effects of anaerobic trainings on central-peripheral fatigue and recovery periods. PhD Thesis, Çukurova University Institute of Health Sciences, Adana.
  3. Atıcı M, Afyon YA (2016). The Effects of Core Training on Swimming in Sedentary Women. Anthropologist, 23(3): 542-549.
  4. Billat LV (2001). Interval training for performance: a scientific and empirical practice. Sports Medicine, 31(1): 13-31.
  5. Cramp FL, Mccullough GR, Lowe AS, Walsh DM (2002). Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: the effect of intensity on local and distal cutaneous blood flow and skin temperature in healthy subjects. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(1): 5-9.
  6. Dedecan H, Çakmakçı E, Biçer M, Akcan F (2016). The Effects of Core Training on Some Physical and Physiologıcal Features of Male Adolescent Students. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 2(4): 131-144.
  7. Delitto A, Brown M, Strube MJ, Rose SJ, Lehman RC (1989). Electrical stimulation of quadriceps femoris in an elite weight lifter: a single subject experiment. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 10(03): 187-191.
  8. Delitto A, Snyder-Mackler L (1990). Two theories of muscle strength augmentation using percutaneous electrical stimulation. Phys Ther, 70(3):158-164.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sports Medicine

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Gökhan İpekoğlu This is me

Cansel Arslanoğlu This is me

Kürşat Acar This is me

Erkal Arslanoğlu * This is me

Publication Date

December 17, 2017

Submission Date

August 29, 2017

Acceptance Date

November 20, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 5 Number: 4

APA
Mor, A., İpekoğlu, G., Arslanoğlu, C., Acar, K., & Arslanoğlu, E. (2017). Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 5(4), 252-262. https://izlik.org/JA37RR99NT
AMA
1.Mor A, İpekoğlu G, Arslanoğlu C, Acar K, Arslanoğlu E. Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science. 2017;5(4):252-262. https://izlik.org/JA37RR99NT
Chicago
Mor, Ahmet, Gökhan İpekoğlu, Cansel Arslanoğlu, Kürşat Acar, and Erkal Arslanoğlu. 2017. “Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters”. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science 5 (4): 252-62. https://izlik.org/JA37RR99NT.
EndNote
Mor A, İpekoğlu G, Arslanoğlu C, Acar K, Arslanoğlu E (December 1, 2017) Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science 5 4 252–262.
IEEE
[1]A. Mor, G. İpekoğlu, C. Arslanoğlu, K. Acar, and E. Arslanoğlu, “Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters”, International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 252–262, Dec. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA37RR99NT
ISNAD
Mor, Ahmet - İpekoğlu, Gökhan - Arslanoğlu, Cansel - Acar, Kürşat - Arslanoğlu, Erkal. “Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters”. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science 5/4 (December 1, 2017): 252-262. https://izlik.org/JA37RR99NT.
JAMA
1.Mor A, İpekoğlu G, Arslanoğlu C, Acar K, Arslanoğlu E. Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science. 2017;5:252–262.
MLA
Mor, Ahmet, et al. “Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters”. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, vol. 5, no. 4, Dec. 2017, pp. 252-6, https://izlik.org/JA37RR99NT.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Mor, Gökhan İpekoğlu, Cansel Arslanoğlu, Kürşat Acar, Erkal Arslanoğlu. Effects of Some Active and Passive Recovery Techniques on Strength Parameters. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science [Internet]. 2017 Dec. 1;5(4):252-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA37RR99NT