EN
Religious Belief vs. Religious Practice. What is More Beneficial to Elite Athletes? An Investigation of Religious/Spiritual Belief, and its Relationship to Challenge & Threat Appraisal
Abstract
Religiosity/spirituality has been linked with reduced anxiety in athlete populations. This study
set out to assess the impact of religious/spiritual belief, opposed to practice, to see whether it
too would predict anxiety, as well as feelings of control and cognitive appraisal in elite
athletes (N = 115). Self-reported self-efficacy, control, achievement goals, life satisfaction,
trait anxiety and strength of belief in a higher power (SBHP) were measured and analysed
with simple linear regressions and multiple regressions (with challenge and threat appraisals
as the dependent variables). The models predicting both challenge and threat appraisal were
found to be significant, although SBHP was not a significant predictor, nor was it
significantly predicative of any of the variables, or significantly correlated with them. The
contribution of religious/spiritual belief to psychological benefits is compared to
religious/spiritual practice and discussed alongside implications for future research and
applied practice.
Keywords
References
- Alder D, Ford PR, Causer J, Williams AM (2016). The effects of high- and low-anxiety training on the anticipation judgments of elite performers. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 38(1), 93-104.
- Bandura A (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
- Bell NT, Johnson SR, Petersen JC (2009). Strength of religious faith of athletes and nonathletes at two NCAA division III institutions. The Sport Journal, 12(1), 1-10.
- Benson PL, Roehlkepartain EC, Rude SP (2003). Spiritual development in childhood and adolescence: Toward a field of inquiry. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 205-213.
- Blascovich J, Tomaka J (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 1-51.
- Blascovich J, Seery MD, Mugridge CA, Norris RK, Weisbuch M (2004). Predicting athletic performance from cardiovascular indexes of challenge and threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 683-688.
- Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, Munafò MR (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 14(5), 365-376.
- Chidester D (1996). The church of baseball, the fetish of Coca-Cola, and the potlatch of rock 'n' roll: Theoretical models for the study of religion in American popular culture. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 64(4), 743-765.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
September 30, 2018
Submission Date
August 6, 2018
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2018 Volume: 6 Number: 3
APA
Jackson, P., & Wood, A. (2018). Religious Belief vs. Religious Practice. What is More Beneficial to Elite Athletes? An Investigation of Religious/Spiritual Belief, and its Relationship to Challenge & Threat Appraisal. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 6(3), 399-422. https://izlik.org/JA72PH94AF
AMA
1.Jackson P, Wood A. Religious Belief vs. Religious Practice. What is More Beneficial to Elite Athletes? An Investigation of Religious/Spiritual Belief, and its Relationship to Challenge & Threat Appraisal. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science. 2018;6(3):399-422. https://izlik.org/JA72PH94AF
Chicago
Jackson, Pete, and Andrew Wood. 2018. “Religious Belief Vs. Religious Practice. What Is More Beneficial to Elite Athletes? An Investigation of Religious Spiritual Belief, and Its Relationship to Challenge & Threat Appraisal”. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science 6 (3): 399-422. https://izlik.org/JA72PH94AF.
EndNote
Jackson P, Wood A (September 1, 2018) Religious Belief vs. Religious Practice. What is More Beneficial to Elite Athletes? An Investigation of Religious/Spiritual Belief, and its Relationship to Challenge & Threat Appraisal. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science 6 3 399–422.
IEEE
[1]P. Jackson and A. Wood, “Religious Belief vs. Religious Practice. What is More Beneficial to Elite Athletes? An Investigation of Religious/Spiritual Belief, and its Relationship to Challenge & Threat Appraisal”, International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 399–422, Sept. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA72PH94AF
ISNAD
Jackson, Pete - Wood, Andrew. “Religious Belief Vs. Religious Practice. What Is More Beneficial to Elite Athletes? An Investigation of Religious Spiritual Belief, and Its Relationship to Challenge & Threat Appraisal”. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science 6/3 (September 1, 2018): 399-422. https://izlik.org/JA72PH94AF.
JAMA
1.Jackson P, Wood A. Religious Belief vs. Religious Practice. What is More Beneficial to Elite Athletes? An Investigation of Religious/Spiritual Belief, and its Relationship to Challenge & Threat Appraisal. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science. 2018;6:399–422.
MLA
Jackson, Pete, and Andrew Wood. “Religious Belief Vs. Religious Practice. What Is More Beneficial to Elite Athletes? An Investigation of Religious Spiritual Belief, and Its Relationship to Challenge & Threat Appraisal”. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, vol. 6, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 399-22, https://izlik.org/JA72PH94AF.
Vancouver
1.Pete Jackson, Andrew Wood. Religious Belief vs. Religious Practice. What is More Beneficial to Elite Athletes? An Investigation of Religious/Spiritual Belief, and its Relationship to Challenge & Threat Appraisal. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science [Internet]. 2018 Sep. 1;6(3):399-422. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA72PH94AF