Judicial Control
Abstract
Pursuant to article 109 of the Law of Criminal Procedure, judicial control is regulated as an alternative measure to arrestment. Prior to the amendment made on 2012 with the Law No. 6352, in order to rule judicial control, the offense must have been limited to an upper limit of three years. Although revocation of said condition is welcomed positively, when we look at the regulation of judicial control, we see that it is a measure which completes arrestment rather than being an alternative to arrestment and also it brings heavier outcomes compare to arrestment in terms of certain liabilities
Keywords
References
- CENTEL, Nur- ZAFER, Hamide, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku, Beta Yayınevi, 9. Bası, İstanbul, 2012.
- CENTEL, Nur, “Yeni Ceza Muhakemesi Yasası’nda Adli Kontrol- Tutuklama- Yakalama ve Haksızlıkların Tazminatla Giderilmesi”,Doç. Dr. Mehmet Somer’in Anısına Armağan, İstanbul, 2006, ss.841-878.
- DONAY, Süheyl, Ceza Yargılaması Hukuku, Beta Yayınevi, 2. Baskı, İstanbul, 2012.
- FEYZİOĞLU, Metin, “5271 Sayılı Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu Hakkında Bazı Tesbit ve Değerlendirmeler”, TBBD, S.62, 2006, ss.27-61.
- İNCİ, Z. Özen, Bir Koruma Tedbiri Olarak Türk Ceza Muhakemesinde Tutuklama, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2008.
- KATOĞLU, Tuğrul, “Tutuklama Tedbirine İlişkin Sorunlar”, ABD, S.4, 2011, ss.17-33.
- KUNTER, Nurullah- YENİSEY, Feridun- NUHOĞLU, Ayşe, Muhakeme Hukuku Dalı Olarak Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku, Beta Yayınevi, 18. Bası, İstanbul, 2010.
- LARGUIER, Jean- CONTE, Philippe, Procedure Penale, 21. Edition, Dalloz, 2006.
- MATHİAS, Eric, Procédure Pénale, Bréal, Paris, 2007.
- MERLE,Roger- VITU, André, Traité de Droit Criminel, Procédure Pénale, Editions Cujas, Paris, 1997.